Platelet count in impedance-based hematology analyzer: Beware of trap!

IF 0.6 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Asian Journal of Transfusion Science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-28 DOI:10.4103/ajts.ajts_65_21
Vani Krishnamurthy, Archana Shivamurthy, Pradeep V Kumar
{"title":"Platelet count in impedance-based hematology analyzer: Beware of trap!","authors":"Vani Krishnamurthy,&nbsp;Archana Shivamurthy,&nbsp;Pradeep V Kumar","doi":"10.4103/ajts.ajts_65_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Among the blood counts, platelet count is most often reported with inconsistency. Many of the analyzers work on electrical impedance principle for red blood cell (RBC) and platelet counting. However, with this technology, factors such as fragmented RBCs, microcytes, cytoplasmic fragments of leukemic cells, lipid particles, fungal yeast forms, and bacteria are known to interfere with platelet count and give spuriously elevated platelet counts. A 72-year-old male was admitted for the treatment of dengue infection who had serial platelet count monitoring. He had an initial platelet count of 48,000/cumm which suddenly improved to 2.6 lakhs within 6 h without any platelet transfusion. Peripheral smear however did not correlate with the machine-derived count. Repeat test after 6 h yielded a result of 56,000/cumm which correlated well with the peripheral smear. This falsely elevated count was due to the presence of lipid particles as the sample was drawn in the postprandial state.</p>","PeriodicalId":42296,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science","volume":"17 1","pages":"131-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fa/5a/AJTS-17-131.PMC10180802.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajts.ajts_65_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among the blood counts, platelet count is most often reported with inconsistency. Many of the analyzers work on electrical impedance principle for red blood cell (RBC) and platelet counting. However, with this technology, factors such as fragmented RBCs, microcytes, cytoplasmic fragments of leukemic cells, lipid particles, fungal yeast forms, and bacteria are known to interfere with platelet count and give spuriously elevated platelet counts. A 72-year-old male was admitted for the treatment of dengue infection who had serial platelet count monitoring. He had an initial platelet count of 48,000/cumm which suddenly improved to 2.6 lakhs within 6 h without any platelet transfusion. Peripheral smear however did not correlate with the machine-derived count. Repeat test after 6 h yielded a result of 56,000/cumm which correlated well with the peripheral smear. This falsely elevated count was due to the presence of lipid particles as the sample was drawn in the postprandial state.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于阻抗的血液分析仪中的血小板计数:小心陷阱!
在血液计数中,血小板计数最常被报道为不一致。许多分析仪采用电阻抗原理进行红细胞(RBC)和血小板计数。然而,利用这项技术,已知碎片化的红细胞、微细胞、白血病细胞的细胞质片段、脂质颗粒、真菌酵母形式和细菌等因素会干扰血小板计数,并导致血小板计数虚假升高。一名72岁男性因登革热感染入院接受治疗,并进行了连续的血小板计数监测。他最初的血小板计数为48000/cumm,在没有任何血小板输注的情况下,在6小时内突然提高到260万。然而,外周涂片与机器得出的计数并不相关。6小时后重复测试得到56000/cumm的结果,这与外周涂片有很好的相关性。这种错误升高的计数是由于在餐后状态下提取样本时存在脂质颗粒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊最新文献
Serial intrauterine transfusion for severe fetal anemia due to anti-M alloimmunization. Pilot study to understand and compare challenges being faced in reporting of transfusion reactions in various types of blood banks enrolled under Haemovigilance Programme of India. Safety and efficacy of therapeutic plasma exchange in neuromyelitis optica: A retrospective study from South India. Serological comparison of weak D versus weakly reacting D by four different methods. Smart approaches for encouraging the blood donation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1