Improving the in Vivo QTc assay: The value of implementing best practices to support an integrated nonclinical-clinical QTc risk assessment and TQT substitute

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.vascn.2023.107265
Hugo M. Vargas , Eric I. Rossman , Todd A. Wisialowski , Jill Nichols , Michael K. Pugsley , Brian Roche , Gary A. Gintant , Andrea Greiter-Wilke , Robert B. Kleiman , Jean-Pierre Valentin , Derek J. Leishman
{"title":"Improving the in Vivo QTc assay: The value of implementing best practices to support an integrated nonclinical-clinical QTc risk assessment and TQT substitute","authors":"Hugo M. Vargas ,&nbsp;Eric I. Rossman ,&nbsp;Todd A. Wisialowski ,&nbsp;Jill Nichols ,&nbsp;Michael K. Pugsley ,&nbsp;Brian Roche ,&nbsp;Gary A. Gintant ,&nbsp;Andrea Greiter-Wilke ,&nbsp;Robert B. Kleiman ,&nbsp;Jean-Pierre Valentin ,&nbsp;Derek J. Leishman","doi":"10.1016/j.vascn.2023.107265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent updates and modifications to the clinical ICH E14 and nonclinical ICH S7B guidelines, which both relate to the evaluation of drug-induced delayed repolarization risk, provide an opportunity for nonclinical <em>in vivo</em> electrocardiographic (ECG) data to directly influence clinical strategies, interpretation, regulatory decision-making and product labeling. This opportunity can be leveraged with more robust nonclinical <em>in vivo</em> QTc datasets based upon consensus standardized protocols and experimental best practices that reduce variability and optimize QTc signal detection, <em>i.e.</em>, demonstrate assay sensitivity. The immediate opportunity for such nonclinical studies is when adequate clinical exposures (<em>e.g.</em>, supratherapeutic) cannot be safely achieved, or other factors limit the robustness of the clinical QTc evaluation, <em>e.g.</em>, the ICH E14 Q5.1 and Q6.1 scenarios. This position paper discusses the regulatory historical evolution and processes leading to this opportunity and details the expectations of future nonclinical <em>in vivo</em> QTc studies of new drug candidates. The conduct of <em>in vivo</em> QTc assays that are consistently designed, executed and analyzed will lead to confident interpretation, and increase their value for clinical QTc risk assessment. Lastly, this paper provides the rationale and basis for our companion article which describes technical details on <em>in vivo</em> QTc best practices and recommendations to achieve the goals of the new ICH E14/S7B Q&amp;As, see Rossman et al., 2023 (this journal).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056871923000163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Recent updates and modifications to the clinical ICH E14 and nonclinical ICH S7B guidelines, which both relate to the evaluation of drug-induced delayed repolarization risk, provide an opportunity for nonclinical in vivo electrocardiographic (ECG) data to directly influence clinical strategies, interpretation, regulatory decision-making and product labeling. This opportunity can be leveraged with more robust nonclinical in vivo QTc datasets based upon consensus standardized protocols and experimental best practices that reduce variability and optimize QTc signal detection, i.e., demonstrate assay sensitivity. The immediate opportunity for such nonclinical studies is when adequate clinical exposures (e.g., supratherapeutic) cannot be safely achieved, or other factors limit the robustness of the clinical QTc evaluation, e.g., the ICH E14 Q5.1 and Q6.1 scenarios. This position paper discusses the regulatory historical evolution and processes leading to this opportunity and details the expectations of future nonclinical in vivo QTc studies of new drug candidates. The conduct of in vivo QTc assays that are consistently designed, executed and analyzed will lead to confident interpretation, and increase their value for clinical QTc risk assessment. Lastly, this paper provides the rationale and basis for our companion article which describes technical details on in vivo QTc best practices and recommendations to achieve the goals of the new ICH E14/S7B Q&As, see Rossman et al., 2023 (this journal).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改进体内QTc测定:实施最佳实践以支持综合非临床临床QTc风险评估和TQT替代品的价值
临床ICH E14和非临床ICH S7B指南的最新更新和修改都与药物诱导的延迟复极风险评估有关,为非临床体内心电图(ECG)数据直接影响临床策略、解释、监管决策和产品标签提供了机会。基于共识标准化协议和实验最佳实践的更稳健的非临床体内QTc数据集可以利用这一机会,减少变异性并优化QTc信号检测,即证明测定灵敏度。此类非临床研究的直接机会是当不能安全地实现足够的临床暴露(例如超治疗性),或者其他因素限制了临床QTc评估的稳健性时,例如ICH E14 Q5.1和Q6.1场景。这篇立场论文讨论了导致这一机会的监管历史演变和过程,并详细介绍了对未来候选新药非临床体内QTc研究的期望。一致设计、执行和分析的体内QTc测定将带来可靠的解释,并增加其在临床QTc风险评估中的价值。最后,本文为我们的配套文章提供了基本原理和依据,该文章描述了体内QTc最佳实践的技术细节,并提出了实现新ICH E14/S7B Q&;如,见Rossman等人,2023(本期刊)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods publishes original articles on current methods of investigation used in pharmacology and toxicology. Pharmacology and toxicology are defined in the broadest sense, referring to actions of drugs and chemicals on all living systems. With its international editorial board and noted contributors, Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods is the leading journal devoted exclusively to experimental procedures used by pharmacologists and toxicologists.
期刊最新文献
Molecular imaging of excitability difference between alkaloids/salts (nicotine, nicotinic benzoate, caffeine and arecoline hydrobromide) In-situ polyherbal gel as biomedicine in the management of Alzheimer's disease: Understanding ameliorative potential in Trimethyltin induced neurodegeneration Evaluation of 4 quantification methods for monitoring 16 antidepressant drugs and their metabolites in human plasma by LC-MS/MS Comparative toxicity assessment of selected nanoparticles using different experimental model organisms Evaluating the proarrhythmic risk of delayed-action compounds in serum free cell culture conditions; serum-starvation accelerates/amplifies the effect of probucol on the KCNQ1 + KCNE1 channel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1