Residents, Employees and Visitors: Effects of Three Types of Ambient Population on Theft on Weekdays and Weekends in Beijing, China.

IF 2.8 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Quantitative Criminology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s10940-021-09538-1
Guangwen Song, Yanji Zhang, Wim Bernasco, Liang Cai, Lin Liu, Bo Qin, Peng Chen
{"title":"Residents, Employees and Visitors: Effects of Three Types of Ambient Population on Theft on Weekdays and Weekends in Beijing, China.","authors":"Guangwen Song,&nbsp;Yanji Zhang,&nbsp;Wim Bernasco,&nbsp;Liang Cai,&nbsp;Lin Liu,&nbsp;Bo Qin,&nbsp;Peng Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10940-021-09538-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The residential population of an area is an incomplete measure of the number of people that are momentarily present in the area, and of limited value as an indicator of exposure to the risk of crime. By accounting for the mobility of the population, measures of ambient population better reflect the momentary presence of people. They have therefore become an alternative indicator of exposure to the risk of crime. This study considers the heterogeneity of the ambient population by distinguishing residents, employees and visitors as different categories, and explores their differential impact on thefts, both on weekdays and weekends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyze one-year of police recorded thefts across 2104 1 km<sup>2</sup> grid cells in a central area in Beijing, China. Controlling for the effects of attractiveness, accessibility, and guardianship, we estimate a series of negative binominal models to investigate the differential effects of the three groups (residents, employees and visitors) in the ambient population on crime frequencies, both on weekdays and during weekends and holidays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, larger ambient populations imply larger theft frequencies. The effect of visitors is stronger than the effects of residents and employees. The effects of residents and employees vary over the course of the week. On weekdays, the presence of residents is more important, while the reverse holds true during weekends and holidays.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The effects of ambient population on thefts vary by its composition in terms of social roles. The larger role of visitors is presumably because in addition to being potential victims, residents and employees may also exercise informal social control. In addition, they spend more time indoors than where risk of theft is lower, while visitors might spend more time outdoors and may also bring about greater anonymity and weaken informal social control.</p>","PeriodicalId":48080,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Quantitative Criminology","volume":"39 2","pages":"385-423"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638235/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Quantitative Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-021-09538-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objectives: The residential population of an area is an incomplete measure of the number of people that are momentarily present in the area, and of limited value as an indicator of exposure to the risk of crime. By accounting for the mobility of the population, measures of ambient population better reflect the momentary presence of people. They have therefore become an alternative indicator of exposure to the risk of crime. This study considers the heterogeneity of the ambient population by distinguishing residents, employees and visitors as different categories, and explores their differential impact on thefts, both on weekdays and weekends.

Methods: We analyze one-year of police recorded thefts across 2104 1 km2 grid cells in a central area in Beijing, China. Controlling for the effects of attractiveness, accessibility, and guardianship, we estimate a series of negative binominal models to investigate the differential effects of the three groups (residents, employees and visitors) in the ambient population on crime frequencies, both on weekdays and during weekends and holidays.

Results: Overall, larger ambient populations imply larger theft frequencies. The effect of visitors is stronger than the effects of residents and employees. The effects of residents and employees vary over the course of the week. On weekdays, the presence of residents is more important, while the reverse holds true during weekends and holidays.

Discussion: The effects of ambient population on thefts vary by its composition in terms of social roles. The larger role of visitors is presumably because in addition to being potential victims, residents and employees may also exercise informal social control. In addition, they spend more time indoors than where risk of theft is lower, while visitors might spend more time outdoors and may also bring about greater anonymity and weaken informal social control.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
北京居民、雇员和访客:工作日和周末三种环境人口对盗窃行为的影响
目的:一个地区的居住人口是暂时出现在该地区的人数的不完全衡量,作为暴露于犯罪风险的指标价值有限。通过考虑人口的流动性,环境人口的测量能更好地反映人的瞬时存在。因此,它们已成为暴露于犯罪风险的另一项指标。本研究通过将居民、员工和访客划分为不同的类别来考虑环境人口的异质性,并探讨了他们在工作日和周末对盗窃的差异影响。方法:我们分析了中国北京中心地区2104平方公里网格单元的一年警方记录的盗窃行为。在控制了吸引力、可达性和监护人的影响后,我们估计了一系列负二项模型,以研究环境人口中三种群体(居民、雇员和游客)在工作日、周末和节假日对犯罪频率的差异影响。结果:总体而言,更大的环境人口意味着更高的盗窃频率。游客的影响比居民和员工的影响更强。居民和雇员的影响在一周内有所不同。在工作日,居民的存在更重要,而在周末和节假日则相反。讨论:环境人口对盗窃的影响因其社会角色的构成而异。游客的作用之所以更大,大概是因为居民和雇员除了是潜在的受害者之外,还可能行使非正式的社会控制。此外,他们花在室内的时间比盗窃风险较低的地方要多,而游客可能会花更多的时间在户外,也可能带来更大的匿名性,削弱非正式的社会控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Quantitative Criminology
Journal of Quantitative Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.80%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Journal of Quantitative Criminology focuses on research advances from such fields as statistics, sociology, geography, political science, economics, and engineering. This timely journal publishes papers that apply quantitative techniques of all levels of complexity to substantive, methodological, or evaluative concerns of interest to the criminological community. Features include original research, brief methodological critiques, and papers that explore new directions for studying a broad range of criminological topics.
期刊最新文献
Social Change, Cohort Effects, and Dynamics of the Age–Crime Relationship: Age and Crime in South Korea from 1967 to 2011 Now You See It, Now You Don’t: A Simulation and Illustration of the Importance of Treating Incomplete Data in Estimating Race Effects in Sentencing Can We Compare Attitudes Towards Crime Around the World? Assessing Measurement Invariance of the Morally Debatable Behavior Scale Across 44 Countries Racial Bias in Criminal Records Investigating the Dynamics of Outlaw Motorcycle Gang Co-Offending Networks: The Utility of Relational Hyper Event Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1