Result reporting and early discontinuation of sepsis trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-02 DOI:10.1111/jebm.12543
Handan Hu, Xinyi Wang, Peng Huang
{"title":"Result reporting and early discontinuation of sepsis trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov","authors":"Handan Hu,&nbsp;Xinyi Wang,&nbsp;Peng Huang","doi":"10.1111/jebm.12543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Sepsis is a leading cause of death from infectious disease or traumatic injury. The prevalence and predictor of results underreporting and early stop of sepsis clinical trials remain poorly studied. To fill the gap, we designed this study to characterize sepsis clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, particularly to recognize features related to premature discontinuation and lack of results reporting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched ClinicalTrials.gov to include interventional sepsis trials up to July 8, 2022. All structured data of the identified trials were extracted and reviewed. A descriptive analysis was conducted. Cox and logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the significance of the association of trial characteristics with early termination and lack of results reporting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 1654 records were identified, among which 1061 eligible trials were reserved. Results underreporting happened in 91.6% of these sepsis interventional trials. 12.0% were discontinued. Moreover, factors that led to the higher risk of discontinuation were the US-registered clinical research and the small sample size. The factor that contributed to results underreporting was non-US-registered clinical trials.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The frequent discontinuation and underreporting of sepsis trials have highly impaired the progress of sepsis management and studies. Therefore, solutions to early discontinuation and improving the quality of results dissemination remain an urgent problem.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jebm.12543","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Sepsis is a leading cause of death from infectious disease or traumatic injury. The prevalence and predictor of results underreporting and early stop of sepsis clinical trials remain poorly studied. To fill the gap, we designed this study to characterize sepsis clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, particularly to recognize features related to premature discontinuation and lack of results reporting.

Methods

We searched ClinicalTrials.gov to include interventional sepsis trials up to July 8, 2022. All structured data of the identified trials were extracted and reviewed. A descriptive analysis was conducted. Cox and logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the significance of the association of trial characteristics with early termination and lack of results reporting.

Results

A total of 1654 records were identified, among which 1061 eligible trials were reserved. Results underreporting happened in 91.6% of these sepsis interventional trials. 12.0% were discontinued. Moreover, factors that led to the higher risk of discontinuation were the US-registered clinical research and the small sample size. The factor that contributed to results underreporting was non-US-registered clinical trials.

Conclusion

The frequent discontinuation and underreporting of sepsis trials have highly impaired the progress of sepsis management and studies. Therefore, solutions to early discontinuation and improving the quality of results dissemination remain an urgent problem.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册的败血症试验的结果报告和早期终止
目的败血症是感染性疾病或创伤性损伤导致死亡的主要原因。脓毒症临床试验结果漏报和早期停止的患病率和预测因素研究仍然很少。为了填补这一空白,我们设计了这项研究来描述在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册的败血症临床试验,特别是识别与过早终止和缺乏结果报告相关的特征。方法:检索ClinicalTrials.gov网站,纳入截至2022年7月8日的介入性败血症试验。提取并回顾所有已确定试验的结构化数据。进行描述性分析。进行Cox和logistic回归分析,以确定试验特征与早期终止和缺乏结果报告的相关性。结果共筛选到1654份文献,保留1061份符合条件的文献。91.6%的脓毒症介入试验存在漏报。12.0%停产。此外,导致停药风险较高的因素是在美国注册的临床研究和小样本量。导致结果少报的因素是未在美国注册的临床试验。结论脓毒症临床试验的频繁中断和少报严重影响了脓毒症治疗和研究的进展。因此,解决早期停药和提高结果传播质量仍然是一个紧迫的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine
Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine (EMB) is an esteemed international healthcare and medical decision-making journal, dedicated to publishing groundbreaking research outcomes in evidence-based decision-making, research, practice, and education. Serving as the official English-language journal of the Cochrane China Centre and West China Hospital of Sichuan University, we eagerly welcome editorials, commentaries, and systematic reviews encompassing various topics such as clinical trials, policy, drug and patient safety, education, and knowledge translation.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of vancomycin compared with those of alternative treatments for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: An umbrella review. Issue Information Clinical practice guidelines addressing Chinese patent medicine interventions: A systematic survey of 113 guidelines and 993 recommendations Systematic review/meta-analysis on the role of CB1R regulation in sleep-wake cycle in rats. Efficacy and safety of RS plus bevacizumab versus RS plus fruquintinib as the third-line therapy in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-world propensity score matching study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1