Predictors of neurocognitive outcome in pediatric ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Child Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-19 DOI:10.1080/09297049.2023.2213461
Claire M Champigny, Samantha J Feldman, Nataly Beribisky, Mary Desrocher, Tamiko Isaacs, Pradeep Krishnan, Georges Monette, Nomazulu Dlamini, Peter Dirks, Robyn Westmacott
{"title":"Predictors of neurocognitive outcome in pediatric ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.","authors":"Claire M Champigny, Samantha J Feldman, Nataly Beribisky, Mary Desrocher, Tamiko Isaacs, Pradeep Krishnan, Georges Monette, Nomazulu Dlamini, Peter Dirks, Robyn Westmacott","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2023.2213461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This clinical study examined the impact of eight predictors (age at stroke, stroke type, lesion size, lesion location, time since stroke, neurologic severity, seizures post-stroke, and socioeconomic status) on neurocognitive functioning following pediatric stroke. Youth with a history of pediatric ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (<i>n</i> = 92, ages six to 25) underwent neuropsychological testing and caregivers completed parent-report questionnaires. Hospital records were accessed for medical history. Spline regressions, likelihood ratios, one-way analysis of variance, Welch's t-tests, and simple linear regressions examined associations between predictors and neuropsychological outcome measures. Large lesions and lower socioeconomic status were associated with worse neurocognitive outcomes across most neurocognitive domains. Ischemic stroke was associated with worse outcome in attention and executive functioning compared to hemorrhagic stroke. Participants with seizures had more severe executive functioning impairments than participants without seizures. Youth with cortical-subcortical lesions scored lower on a few measures than youth with cortical or subcortical lesions. Neurologic severity predicted scores on few measures. No differences were found based on time since stroke, lesion laterality, or supra- versus infratentorial lesion. In conclusion, lesion size and socioeconomic status predict neurocognitive outcome following pediatric stroke. An improved understanding of predictors is valuable to clinicians who have responsibilities related to neuropsychological assessment and treatments for this population. Findings should inform clinical practice through enhanced appraisals of prognosis and the use of a biopsychosocial approach when conceptualizing neurocognitive outcome and setting up support services aimed at fostering optimal development for youth with stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"444-461"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2023.2213461","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This clinical study examined the impact of eight predictors (age at stroke, stroke type, lesion size, lesion location, time since stroke, neurologic severity, seizures post-stroke, and socioeconomic status) on neurocognitive functioning following pediatric stroke. Youth with a history of pediatric ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (n = 92, ages six to 25) underwent neuropsychological testing and caregivers completed parent-report questionnaires. Hospital records were accessed for medical history. Spline regressions, likelihood ratios, one-way analysis of variance, Welch's t-tests, and simple linear regressions examined associations between predictors and neuropsychological outcome measures. Large lesions and lower socioeconomic status were associated with worse neurocognitive outcomes across most neurocognitive domains. Ischemic stroke was associated with worse outcome in attention and executive functioning compared to hemorrhagic stroke. Participants with seizures had more severe executive functioning impairments than participants without seizures. Youth with cortical-subcortical lesions scored lower on a few measures than youth with cortical or subcortical lesions. Neurologic severity predicted scores on few measures. No differences were found based on time since stroke, lesion laterality, or supra- versus infratentorial lesion. In conclusion, lesion size and socioeconomic status predict neurocognitive outcome following pediatric stroke. An improved understanding of predictors is valuable to clinicians who have responsibilities related to neuropsychological assessment and treatments for this population. Findings should inform clinical practice through enhanced appraisals of prognosis and the use of a biopsychosocial approach when conceptualizing neurocognitive outcome and setting up support services aimed at fostering optimal development for youth with stroke.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小儿缺血性和出血性中风的神经认知结果预测因素。
这项临床研究探讨了八种预测因素(中风年龄、中风类型、病灶大小、病灶位置、中风后时间、神经系统严重程度、中风后癫痫发作以及社会经济状况)对小儿中风后神经认知功能的影响。有小儿缺血性或出血性脑卒中病史的青少年(n = 92,年龄在 6-25 岁之间)接受了神经心理学测试,照顾者填写了家长报告问卷。医院记录可用于了解病史。样条回归、似然比、单因素方差分析、韦尔奇 t 检验和简单线性回归检验了预测因素与神经心理学结果测量之间的关系。在大多数神经认知领域,大面积病变和较低的社会经济地位与较差的神经认知结果有关。与出血性中风相比,缺血性中风患者的注意力和执行功能结果更差。与无癫痫发作的参与者相比,有癫痫发作的参与者的执行功能障碍更为严重。皮层-皮层下病变的青少年在一些指标上的得分低于皮层或皮层下病变的青少年。神经系统的严重程度可以预测几项指标的得分。没有发现中风后时间、病变侧位或脑室上病变与脑室下病变的差异。总之,病灶大小和社会经济状况可预测小儿卒中后的神经认知结果。加深对这些预测因素的了解,对负责对这一人群进行神经心理评估和治疗的临床医生很有价值。临床实践中应加强对预后的评估,在对神经认知结果进行概念化时采用生物-心理-社会方法,并建立旨在促进中风青少年最佳发展的支持服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Child Neuropsychology
Child Neuropsychology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purposes of Child Neuropsychology are to: publish research on the neuropsychological effects of disorders which affect brain functioning in children and adolescents, publish research on the neuropsychological dimensions of development in childhood and adolescence and promote the integration of theory, method and research findings in child/developmental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of Child Neuropsychology is to publish original empirical research. Theoretical and methodological papers and theoretically relevant case studies are welcome. Critical reviews of topics pertinent to child/developmental neuropsychology are encouraged. Emphases of interest include the following: information processing mechanisms; the impact of injury or disease on neuropsychological functioning; behavioral cognitive and pharmacological approaches to treatment/intervention; psychosocial correlates of neuropsychological dysfunction; definitive normative, reliability, and validity studies of psychometric and other procedures used in the neuropsychological assessment of children and adolescents. Articles on both normal and dysfunctional development that are relevant to the aforementioned dimensions are welcome. Multiple approaches (e.g., basic, applied, clinical) and multiple methodologies (e.g., cross-sectional, longitudinal, experimental, multivariate, correlational) are appropriate. Books, media, and software reviews will be published.
期刊最新文献
Development of inattention and executive dysfunction in youth with spina bifida: condition severity variables as predictors. Evidence of validity of the Head-Toes-Knees-Shoulders Revised (HTKS-R) for Brazilian children. Neurocognitive outcomes following intracerebral hemorrhage in childhood. The relationship between executive functions and mathematics achievements in early-grade elementary students. Learning from those who thrive: protective factors and neuroimaging markers in adolescents with complex congenital heart disease and with a favorable neurodevelopmental profile.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1