Pinch points in the consultation - and how to avoid them.

IF 1.5 Q3 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Education for Primary Care Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1080/14739879.2023.2169641
Martin Brunet
{"title":"Pinch points in the consultation - and how to avoid them.","authors":"Martin Brunet","doi":"10.1080/14739879.2023.2169641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The GP consultation is a fluid, complex interaction that is difficult to define, but points can be identified where the consultation can run smoothly, or rapidly derail and become dysfunctional. In teaching communication skills we can help trainees to recognise these 'pinch points' and to equip them with the tools to successfully navigate the challenges they present. This paper uses the concept of the Two Houses model for the consultation to explore three such pinch points: Keeping the consultation dance going; how 'need' is a power word and should be used with caution; and the value of considering whether the patient is looking for a better understanding of their problem, or a solution, or both. Seeing the consultation as like a dance between doctor and patient can help illustrate the importance of the doctor and patient working together, and for the doctor to be alert to cues that the 'dancers' are drifting apart. The skills needed to keep the dance going throughout the consultation are considered. The perils of telling the patient that they 'don't need' something they believe they do need are explored within the concept of encountering an 'empty room' in the Two Houses model, while the distinction between gaining understanding and seeking a solution is illustrated by considering the Two Wings of the House of Decision within the model.</p>","PeriodicalId":46436,"journal":{"name":"Education for Primary Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2023.2169641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The GP consultation is a fluid, complex interaction that is difficult to define, but points can be identified where the consultation can run smoothly, or rapidly derail and become dysfunctional. In teaching communication skills we can help trainees to recognise these 'pinch points' and to equip them with the tools to successfully navigate the challenges they present. This paper uses the concept of the Two Houses model for the consultation to explore three such pinch points: Keeping the consultation dance going; how 'need' is a power word and should be used with caution; and the value of considering whether the patient is looking for a better understanding of their problem, or a solution, or both. Seeing the consultation as like a dance between doctor and patient can help illustrate the importance of the doctor and patient working together, and for the doctor to be alert to cues that the 'dancers' are drifting apart. The skills needed to keep the dance going throughout the consultation are considered. The perils of telling the patient that they 'don't need' something they believe they do need are explored within the concept of encountering an 'empty room' in the Two Houses model, while the distinction between gaining understanding and seeking a solution is illustrated by considering the Two Wings of the House of Decision within the model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在咨询中捏点-以及如何避免它们。
全科医生的咨询是一种流动的、复杂的互动,很难定义,但可以确定的点是,咨询可以顺利进行,或迅速脱轨和功能失调。在教授沟通技巧时,我们可以帮助学员认识到这些“关键点”,并为他们配备成功应对挑战的工具。本文运用“两院”模式的概念,探讨了协商的三个关键点:保持协商的舞蹈;“需要”是一个权力词,应该谨慎使用;考虑病人是在寻求更好地理解他们的问题,还是寻求解决方案,还是两者兼而有之的价值。把咨询看作是医生和病人之间的舞蹈,可以帮助说明医生和病人一起工作的重要性,也可以让医生警惕“舞者”渐行渐远的迹象。在整个咨询过程中,需要考虑保持舞蹈进行的技巧。告诉病人他们“不需要”他们认为他们确实需要的东西的危险是在“两栋房子”模型中遇到“空房间”的概念中探索的,而获得理解和寻求解决方案之间的区别是通过考虑模型中“决定之家的两翼”来说明的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Education for Primary Care
Education for Primary Care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Education for Primary Care aims to reflect the best experience, expertise and innovative ideas in the development of undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing primary care education. The journal is UK based but welcomes contributions from all over the world. Readers will benefit from the broader perspectives on educational activities provided through the contributions of all health professionals, including general practitioners, nurses, midwives, health visitors, community nurses and managers. This sharing of experiences has the potential for enhancing healthcare delivery and for promoting interprofessional working.
期刊最新文献
Lessons learned from the experiences of patients with long-term conditions: recommendations for enhancing the undergraduate medical curriculum. Consequences of career progression barriers experienced by doctors in GP training: an interpretative phenomenological study. Beyond accountability and Learner Agency: a call for a comprehensive approach to portfolio management. What about us?: a call to include oral health professions within interprofessional education for collaborative practice. What can we learn from pandemic educational methods?: military general practice trainees' attitudes to feedback from recorded consultations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1