Combining an experiential learning model and interprofessional peer-mentoring to improve maternal and neonatal health: Lessons learned from Indonesia.

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Education for Health Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.4103/efh.EfH_375_20
Prattama Santoso Utomo, Robertus Arian Datusanantyo, John Hartono, Aemilianus Yollan Permana, Triharnoto Triharnoto
{"title":"Combining an experiential learning model and interprofessional peer-mentoring to improve maternal and neonatal health: Lessons learned from Indonesia.","authors":"Prattama Santoso Utomo,&nbsp;Robertus Arian Datusanantyo,&nbsp;John Hartono,&nbsp;Aemilianus Yollan Permana,&nbsp;Triharnoto Triharnoto","doi":"10.4103/efh.EfH_375_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High maternal-neonatal mortality rate in the East Nusa Tenggara Timur Province, Indonesia, has raised a concern about improving quality health care and prevention. A task force team consisting of the district health office and the corresponding hospital implemented an interprofessional peer mentoring for improving maternal-neonatal health initiative involving various health professionals and community members. This study assesses the effectiveness of the interprofessional peer-mentoring program in improving health-care workers' capacity and community members' awareness of maternal-neonatal health in the primary care setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods action research was conducted to measure the effectiveness of the peer-mentoring program. The task force appointed 15 personnel to be trained as peer mentors for 60 mentees from various professions. Peer mentors' perceptions of knowledge and skills improvement were measured before and after the training program. A reflective logbook was then developed to document mentoring activities. Surveys and logbook observations were performed to measure the effectiveness of the 8-month peer-mentoring program. Mentees' capacity and perception were measured before and after the mentoring program. Quantitative data were analyzed using the descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon's paired-rank test, whereas open-ended responses and log-book reflection were analyzed using the content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The peer-mentor training program improved peer mentors' knowledge and readiness from 3.64/5.00 to 4.23/5.00 (P < 0.001). Moreover, mentees viewed the program as effective in improving self-confidence and working capacity in maternal-neonatal health services from 3.47/5.00 to 3.98/5.00 (P < 0.001). Open-ended responses and a reflective logbook revealed that both mentees and peer mentors gained positive learning experiences. Seniority might become an obstacle to the mentoring process since peer mentors reported barriers in engaging elderly mentees due to seniority issues.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The interprofessional peer-mentoring program was effective in improving both mentors' and mentees' knowledge, self-confidence, and working capacity in maternal-neonatal primary health services and experiential learning. Further observation of the long-term outcomes of the program should be undertaken.</p>","PeriodicalId":46742,"journal":{"name":"Education for Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/efh.EfH_375_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: High maternal-neonatal mortality rate in the East Nusa Tenggara Timur Province, Indonesia, has raised a concern about improving quality health care and prevention. A task force team consisting of the district health office and the corresponding hospital implemented an interprofessional peer mentoring for improving maternal-neonatal health initiative involving various health professionals and community members. This study assesses the effectiveness of the interprofessional peer-mentoring program in improving health-care workers' capacity and community members' awareness of maternal-neonatal health in the primary care setting.

Methods: A mixed-methods action research was conducted to measure the effectiveness of the peer-mentoring program. The task force appointed 15 personnel to be trained as peer mentors for 60 mentees from various professions. Peer mentors' perceptions of knowledge and skills improvement were measured before and after the training program. A reflective logbook was then developed to document mentoring activities. Surveys and logbook observations were performed to measure the effectiveness of the 8-month peer-mentoring program. Mentees' capacity and perception were measured before and after the mentoring program. Quantitative data were analyzed using the descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon's paired-rank test, whereas open-ended responses and log-book reflection were analyzed using the content analysis.

Results: The peer-mentor training program improved peer mentors' knowledge and readiness from 3.64/5.00 to 4.23/5.00 (P < 0.001). Moreover, mentees viewed the program as effective in improving self-confidence and working capacity in maternal-neonatal health services from 3.47/5.00 to 3.98/5.00 (P < 0.001). Open-ended responses and a reflective logbook revealed that both mentees and peer mentors gained positive learning experiences. Seniority might become an obstacle to the mentoring process since peer mentors reported barriers in engaging elderly mentees due to seniority issues.

Discussion: The interprofessional peer-mentoring program was effective in improving both mentors' and mentees' knowledge, self-confidence, and working capacity in maternal-neonatal primary health services and experiential learning. Further observation of the long-term outcomes of the program should be undertaken.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合体验式学习模式和专业间同行指导以改善孕产妇和新生儿健康:从印度尼西亚吸取的经验教训。
背景:印度尼西亚东努沙登加拉帖木儿省孕产妇-新生儿死亡率高,这引起了人们对提高卫生保健和预防质量的关注。一个由地区卫生局和相应医院组成的工作队实施了一项由各种保健专业人员和社区成员参与的改善孕产妇-新生儿保健的跨专业同伴指导倡议。本研究评估了跨专业同伴指导计划在提高初级保健环境中卫生保健工作者能力和社区成员对孕产妇-新生儿健康的认识方面的有效性。方法:采用混合方法的行动研究来衡量同侪辅导计划的有效性。工作队任命了15名人员,为来自不同行业的60名学员培训同伴导师。在培训计划前后测量同伴导师对知识和技能改善的感知。然后开发了一个反思日志来记录指导活动。通过调查和日志观察来衡量为期8个月的同伴指导计划的有效性。在师徒计划前后测量学员的能力和知觉。定量数据采用描述性统计和Wilcoxon配对检验进行分析,开放式回答和日志反映采用内容分析进行分析。结果:同伴导师培训使同伴导师的知识和准备度从3.64/5.00提高到4.23/5.00 (P < 0.001)。此外,学员认为该方案有效地提高了母婴保健服务的自信心和工作能力,从3.47/5.00提高到3.98/5.00 (P < 0.001)。开放式回答和反思日志显示,学员和同侪导师都获得了积极的学习经验。资历可能会成为指导过程的障碍,因为同辈导师报告说,由于资历问题,在聘用年长的学员方面存在障碍。讨论:跨专业同侪辅导计划在提高导师和学员在母婴初级卫生服务和体验式学习方面的知识、自信和工作能力方面是有效的。应进一步观察该计划的长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Education for Health
Education for Health EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice (EfH) is the scholarly, peer-reviewed journal of The Network: Towards Unity for Health. Our readers are health professionals, health professions educators and learners, health care researchers, policymakers, community leaders and administrators from all over the world. We publish original studies, reviews, think pieces, works in progress and commentaries on current trends, issues, and controversies. We especially want to provide our international readers with fresh ideas and innovative models of education and health services that can enable them to be maximally responsive to the healthcare needs of the communities in which they work and learn.
期刊最新文献
The Way Forward for Integrated Health Sciences Degree Programs Education about Planetary Health and Sustainable Healthcare in low- and middle-income countries: Planetary Health Report Card assessment of perceptions at University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences Lessons learned in development of vision and mission statements How do Educational Staff and Students in a Medical School Perceive Social Accountability? A Multi-Perspective Qualitative Interview Study Thank you, Michael Glasser!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1