Electrical Stimulation for Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Meta-analysis for Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuropediatrics Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-26 DOI:10.1055/a-2081-1560
Yu Liu, Hongzhi Li
{"title":"Electrical Stimulation for Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Meta-analysis for Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Yu Liu, Hongzhi Li","doi":"10.1055/a-2081-1560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different types of electrical stimulation (ES) showed diverse effects on children with cerebral palsy (CP). Previous studies reported inconsistent results for effects of ES on children with CP. The present study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to summarize these diverse results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for studies exploring effects of ES on children with CP in databases (PubMed and Web of Science) from their inception until December 2022. Standard mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using STATA 12.0 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 19 randomized controlled trials (including 265 CP patients in test group and 263 CP patients in corresponding control group). The study showed an increased improvement in gross motor function, walking speed, step length, and daily living activities in ES group compared with corresponding control group with random effects models (gross motor function: SMD = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.43-2.65; walking speed: SMD = 3.71, 95% CI = 1.49-5.92; step length: SMD = 1.89, 95% CI = 0.65-3.13; daily living activities: SMD = 5.18, 95% CI = 3.04-7.31), whereas the study showed no significant difference in change of muscle strength between ES group and the corresponding control group with a random effects model (SMD = 0.42, 95% CI = -0.12 to 0.97).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrated that ES might be used as therapy to improve gross motor function, gait, and daily living activities in children with CP.</p>","PeriodicalId":19421,"journal":{"name":"Neuropediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2081-1560","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Different types of electrical stimulation (ES) showed diverse effects on children with cerebral palsy (CP). Previous studies reported inconsistent results for effects of ES on children with CP. The present study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to summarize these diverse results.

Methods: We searched for studies exploring effects of ES on children with CP in databases (PubMed and Web of Science) from their inception until December 2022. Standard mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using STATA 12.0 software.

Results: The meta-analysis included 19 randomized controlled trials (including 265 CP patients in test group and 263 CP patients in corresponding control group). The study showed an increased improvement in gross motor function, walking speed, step length, and daily living activities in ES group compared with corresponding control group with random effects models (gross motor function: SMD = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.43-2.65; walking speed: SMD = 3.71, 95% CI = 1.49-5.92; step length: SMD = 1.89, 95% CI = 0.65-3.13; daily living activities: SMD = 5.18, 95% CI = 3.04-7.31), whereas the study showed no significant difference in change of muscle strength between ES group and the corresponding control group with a random effects model (SMD = 0.42, 95% CI = -0.12 to 0.97).

Conclusion: The study demonstrated that ES might be used as therapy to improve gross motor function, gait, and daily living activities in children with CP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电刺激治疗脑瘫儿童:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
背景:不同类型的电刺激(ES)对脑瘫(CP)患儿的治疗效果不同。先前的研究报告了ES对CP患儿影响的不一致结果。本研究旨在进行荟萃分析以总结这些不同的结果。方法:从数据库(PubMed和Web of Science)建立到2022年12月,我们检索了探讨ES对CP儿童影响的研究。使用STATA 12.0软件计算标准均值差(SMDs)和95%置信区间(ci)。结果:meta分析纳入19项随机对照试验(试验组265例CP患者,相应对照组263例CP患者)。研究显示,与随机效应模型的对照组相比,ES组大肌肉运动功能、步行速度、步长和日常生活活动的改善有所增加(大肌肉运动功能:SMD = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.43-2.65;步行速度:SMD = 3.71, 95% CI = 1.49 ~ 5.92;步长:SMD = 1.89, 95% CI = 0.65-3.13;日常生活活动:SMD = 5.18, 95% CI = 3.04-7.31),而研究采用随机效应模型显示ES组与相应对照组的肌力变化无显著差异(SMD = 0.42, 95% CI = -0.12 ~ 0.97)。结论:本研究表明,肌电刺激可用于改善CP患儿的大运动功能、步态和日常生活活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropediatrics
Neuropediatrics 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: For key insights into today''s practice of pediatric neurology, Neuropediatrics is the worldwide journal of choice. Original articles, case reports and panel discussions are the distinctive features of a journal that always keeps abreast of current developments and trends - the reason it has developed into an internationally recognized forum for specialists throughout the world. Pediatricians, neurologists, neurosurgeons, and neurobiologists will find it essential reading.
期刊最新文献
Neurological Findings and a Brief Review of the Current Literature in a Severe Case of Aicardi-Goutières Syndrome Due to an IFIH1 Mutation. Potentially Life-Threatening Interaction between Opioids and Intrathecal Baclofen in Individuals with a Childhood-Onset Neurological Disorder: A Case Series and Review of the Literature. Reversal of Benzodiazepine-Induced Myoclonus by Flumazenil in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Phenotypic/Genotypic Profile of Children with Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis in Southern Brazil. Sequential Treatment with Modified Atkins Diet and Low Glycemic Index Treatment for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy in Children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1