A Better Way to Breathe: Combining Allergy and Pulmonary Care Into One Clinic.

Kelly Colas, Kavita Vyas, Dipa K Sheth
{"title":"A Better Way to Breathe: Combining Allergy and Pulmonary Care Into One Clinic.","authors":"Kelly Colas,&nbsp;Kavita Vyas,&nbsp;Dipa K Sheth","doi":"10.12788/fp.0352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of biologic agents for severe asthma has transformed management, decreasing asthma exacerbations, improving lung function, reducing corticosteroid use, and decreasing hospitalizations. However, numerous financial and logistic barriers have complicated the implementation of biologic agents, including long wait times to see specialists and insurance coverage.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed for 15 patients enrolled in this severe allergy clinic at the Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center over 30 months. Outcomes examined included emergency department visits, hospitalizations, intensive care unit (ICU) stays, forced expiratory volume (FEV<sub>1</sub>), and steroid use. The average use of steroids decreased from 4.2 to 0.6 tapers per year following the initiation of biologics. There was an average 10% improvement in FEV<sub>1</sub> after starting a biologic. Thirteen percent of patients (n = 2) had an emergency department visit for an asthma exacerbation since starting a biologic agent, 0.6% of patients (n = 1) had a hospital admission for an asthma exacerbation, and no patients had an ICU stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biologic agents have significantly improved outcomes for patients with severe asthma. The model of a combined allergy/pulmonology clinic can be particularly efficacious in the treatment of severe asthma, as it reduces the need for multiple appointments with different specialties, reduces wait time before starting a biologic agent, and offers the perspective of 2 specialists.</p>","PeriodicalId":73021,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":"40 1","pages":"16-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201944/pdf/fp-40-01-16.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of biologic agents for severe asthma has transformed management, decreasing asthma exacerbations, improving lung function, reducing corticosteroid use, and decreasing hospitalizations. However, numerous financial and logistic barriers have complicated the implementation of biologic agents, including long wait times to see specialists and insurance coverage.

Observations: A retrospective chart review was performed for 15 patients enrolled in this severe allergy clinic at the Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center over 30 months. Outcomes examined included emergency department visits, hospitalizations, intensive care unit (ICU) stays, forced expiratory volume (FEV1), and steroid use. The average use of steroids decreased from 4.2 to 0.6 tapers per year following the initiation of biologics. There was an average 10% improvement in FEV1 after starting a biologic. Thirteen percent of patients (n = 2) had an emergency department visit for an asthma exacerbation since starting a biologic agent, 0.6% of patients (n = 1) had a hospital admission for an asthma exacerbation, and no patients had an ICU stay.

Conclusions: Biologic agents have significantly improved outcomes for patients with severe asthma. The model of a combined allergy/pulmonology clinic can be particularly efficacious in the treatment of severe asthma, as it reduces the need for multiple appointments with different specialties, reduces wait time before starting a biologic agent, and offers the perspective of 2 specialists.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种更好的呼吸方式:将过敏和肺部护理结合到一个诊所。
背景:使用生物制剂治疗严重哮喘已经改变了治疗方法,减少了哮喘加重,改善了肺功能,减少了皮质类固醇的使用,减少了住院率。然而,许多财政和后勤障碍使生物制剂的实施变得复杂,包括看专家和保险范围的长时间等待。观察:对在华盛顿特区退伍军人事务医疗中心的严重过敏诊所登记的15名患者进行回顾性图表回顾,时间超过30个月。研究结果包括急诊就诊、住院、重症监护病房(ICU)住院、用力呼气量(FEV1)和类固醇使用。在开始使用生物制剂后,类固醇的平均使用量从每年4.2减少到0.6。开始生物制剂治疗后,FEV1平均改善了10%。自开始使用生物制剂以来,13%的患者(n = 2)因哮喘加重而去急诊室就诊,0.6%的患者(n = 1)因哮喘加重而住院,没有患者住过ICU。结论:生物制剂可显著改善重症哮喘患者的预后。过敏症/肺科联合诊所的模式在治疗严重哮喘方面尤其有效,因为它减少了与不同专业的多次预约的需要,减少了开始使用生物制剂前的等待时间,并提供了两位专家的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Olfactory Hallucinations Following COVID-19 Vaccination. Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Outcomes by p16INK4a Antigen Status in a Veteran Population. Outcomes in Patients With Curative Malignancies Receiving Filgrastim as Primary Prophylaxis. Contralateral Constrictor Dose Predicts Swallowing Function After Radiation for Head and Neck Cancer. Acute Painful Horner Syndrome as the First Presenting Sign of Carotid Artery Dissection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1