Risk assessment of child-pornography-exclusive offenders.

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Law and Human Behavior Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1037/lhb0000537
Nicholas Scurich, Daniel A Krauss
{"title":"Risk assessment of child-pornography-exclusive offenders.","authors":"Nicholas Scurich,&nbsp;Daniel A Krauss","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A sizeable percentage of federally sentenced child pornography offenders have no history of other criminal offenses (hereinafter \"child-pornography-exclusive offenders\"). There is a critical legal need to assess the recidivism risk of this population. The Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT) is a commonly used actuarial instrument developed specifically to assess the risk of recidivism among child pornography offenders.</p><p><strong>Hypotheses: </strong>We hypothesized that there would be a sound scientific basis supporting the use of the CPORT in the United States as well as research demonstrating its applicability to child-pornography-exclusive offenders, given that the instrument is currently being used in forensic settings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We critically examined all of the existing empirical studies that constitute the research base of the CPORT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The empirical studies of the CPORT suffer from at least three significant limitations: extremely small samples of recidivists, inordinate amounts of missing data, and potentially outdated samples. Further, none of the studies have tested the CPORT in a sample of offenders in the United States. An illustrative example of how the instrument has been misapplied in forensic settings and courtroom testimony is provided.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These issues make it inappropriate to use the CPORT on child-pornography-exclusive offenders in the United States at this time. We conclude by describing avenues for future research that can advance our understanding of this distinct and growing population of offenders. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48230,"journal":{"name":"Law and Human Behavior","volume":"47 4","pages":"499-509"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000537","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: A sizeable percentage of federally sentenced child pornography offenders have no history of other criminal offenses (hereinafter "child-pornography-exclusive offenders"). There is a critical legal need to assess the recidivism risk of this population. The Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT) is a commonly used actuarial instrument developed specifically to assess the risk of recidivism among child pornography offenders.

Hypotheses: We hypothesized that there would be a sound scientific basis supporting the use of the CPORT in the United States as well as research demonstrating its applicability to child-pornography-exclusive offenders, given that the instrument is currently being used in forensic settings.

Method: We critically examined all of the existing empirical studies that constitute the research base of the CPORT.

Results: The empirical studies of the CPORT suffer from at least three significant limitations: extremely small samples of recidivists, inordinate amounts of missing data, and potentially outdated samples. Further, none of the studies have tested the CPORT in a sample of offenders in the United States. An illustrative example of how the instrument has been misapplied in forensic settings and courtroom testimony is provided.

Conclusions: These issues make it inappropriate to use the CPORT on child-pornography-exclusive offenders in the United States at this time. We conclude by describing avenues for future research that can advance our understanding of this distinct and growing population of offenders. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专门从事儿童色情制品犯罪者的风险评估。
目标:相当大比例的联邦判处儿童色情犯罪者没有其他刑事犯罪史(以下简称“儿童色情犯罪者”)。对这一人群的再犯风险进行评估是一项至关重要的法律需要。儿童色情犯罪者风险工具(CPORT)是一种常用的精算工具,专门用于评估儿童色情犯罪者的再犯风险。假设:我们假设在美国使用CPORT是有可靠的科学依据的,而且考虑到该工具目前正在法医环境中使用,也有研究表明它适用于只涉及儿童色情的罪犯。方法:对构成CPORT研究基础的所有现有实证研究进行批判性分析。结果:CPORT的实证研究至少存在三个显著的局限性:累犯样本极小,数据缺失量过大,样本可能过时。此外,这些研究都没有在美国的罪犯样本中测试CPORT。提供了一个说明该工具如何在法医环境和法庭证词中被误用的例子。结论:这些问题使得目前在美国将CPORT用于专门针对儿童色情的罪犯是不合适的。最后,我们描述了未来研究的途径,可以促进我们对这一独特的和不断增长的罪犯群体的理解。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Law and Human Behavior, the official journal of the American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association, is a multidisciplinary forum for the publication of articles and discussions of issues arising out of the relationships between human behavior and the law, our legal system, and the legal process. This journal publishes original research, reviews of past research, and theoretical studies from professionals in criminal justice, law, psychology, sociology, psychiatry, political science, education, communication, and other areas germane to the field.
期刊最新文献
Police-induced confessions, 2.0: Risk factors and recommendations. The state of open science in the field of psychology and law. The Miranda penalty: Inferring guilt from suspects' silence. Comparing predictive validity of Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory scores in Indigenous and non-Indigenous Canadian youth. Regional gender bias and year predict gender representation on civil trial teams.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1