Comparison of the effects of preoperative celecoxib and gabapentin on pain, functional recovery, and quality of life after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jrms.jrms_416_22
Mehdi Motififard, Saeed Hatami, Awat Feizi, Arash Toghyani, Mohammad Parhamfar
{"title":"Comparison of the effects of preoperative celecoxib and gabapentin on pain, functional recovery, and quality of life after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Mehdi Motififard,&nbsp;Saeed Hatami,&nbsp;Awat Feizi,&nbsp;Arash Toghyani,&nbsp;Mohammad Parhamfar","doi":"10.4103/jrms.jrms_416_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute pain is one of the main complaints of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which causes delayed mobility, increased morphine consumption, and subsequently increased costs. Therefore, the present study was performed to evaluate the preventive effect of preoperative celecoxib and gabapentin on reducing patient pain as a primary outcome after TKA surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial was performed on 270 patients with osteoarthritis that were candidates for TKA surgery allocated into three groups. In the first group, 900 mg of gabapentin was administered orally on a daily basis for 3 days before surgery. In the second group, 200 mg of oral celecoxib was administered twice daily for 3 days before surgery. In the third group, oral placebo was administered twice daily for 3 days before the surgery. The patients' pain score and knee and its functional score were recoded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean of reduction pain in gabapentin and celecoxib groups was significantly lower than that of the control group at 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery (<i>P</i> < 0.001); however, two groups were not significantly different from each other (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Furthermore, the two medication groups were not significantly different in this regard (<i>P</i> > 0.05). In addition, the knee score in the gabapentin group with the means of 85.40 ± 5.47 and the celecoxib group with the means of 87.03 ± 3.97 were significantly higher than those of the control group with the means of 78.90 ± 4.39 in the 1<sup>st</sup> month after the surgery (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the results of the present study, the preventive administration of gabapentin and celecoxib showed a significant and similar effectiveness on reducing patient pain after TKA surgery and on improving the KSS and quality of life scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":50062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","volume":"28 ","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d4/e9/JRMS-28-50.PMC10366981.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_416_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute pain is one of the main complaints of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which causes delayed mobility, increased morphine consumption, and subsequently increased costs. Therefore, the present study was performed to evaluate the preventive effect of preoperative celecoxib and gabapentin on reducing patient pain as a primary outcome after TKA surgery.

Materials and methods: This randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial was performed on 270 patients with osteoarthritis that were candidates for TKA surgery allocated into three groups. In the first group, 900 mg of gabapentin was administered orally on a daily basis for 3 days before surgery. In the second group, 200 mg of oral celecoxib was administered twice daily for 3 days before surgery. In the third group, oral placebo was administered twice daily for 3 days before the surgery. The patients' pain score and knee and its functional score were recoded.

Results: The mean of reduction pain in gabapentin and celecoxib groups was significantly lower than that of the control group at 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery (P < 0.001); however, two groups were not significantly different from each other (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the two medication groups were not significantly different in this regard (P > 0.05). In addition, the knee score in the gabapentin group with the means of 85.40 ± 5.47 and the celecoxib group with the means of 87.03 ± 3.97 were significantly higher than those of the control group with the means of 78.90 ± 4.39 in the 1st month after the surgery (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, the preventive administration of gabapentin and celecoxib showed a significant and similar effectiveness on reducing patient pain after TKA surgery and on improving the KSS and quality of life scores.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前塞来昔布和加巴喷丁对全膝关节置换术后疼痛、功能恢复和生活质量影响的比较:一项随机对照临床试验。
背景:急性疼痛是全膝关节置换术(TKA)后患者的主要主诉之一,它导致活动延迟,吗啡消耗增加,随后费用增加。因此,本研究旨在评估术前塞来昔布和加巴喷丁对减轻患者疼痛的预防作用,并将其作为TKA手术后的主要结局。材料和方法:这项随机、双盲对照临床试验对270例骨关节炎患者进行TKA手术,这些患者被分为三组。第一组患者术前3天每天口服加巴喷丁900毫克。第二组患者术前3天口服塞来昔布200 mg,每日2次。在第三组中,在手术前3天每天口服安慰剂两次。对患者的疼痛评分、膝关节及其功能评分进行重新记录。结果:加巴喷丁组和塞来昔布组术后12、24、48 h疼痛减轻均值显著低于对照组(P < 0.001);两组间差异不显著(P > 0.05)。两用药组在这方面差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。加巴喷丁组术后1个月膝关节评分均值为85.40±5.47,塞来昔布组术后1个月膝关节评分均值为87.03±3.97,显著高于对照组78.90±4.39 (P < 0.001)。结论:根据本研究结果,加巴喷丁和塞来昔布预防性应用在减轻TKA术后患者疼痛、改善KSS和生活质量评分方面具有显著且相似的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online continuous journal with print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.jmsjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.
期刊最新文献
A multistate survival model in rectal cancer surgery research for locally advanced patients. Cognitive function and brain magnetic resonance imaging profiles in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and multiple sclerosis. Epidemiology of malaria in saravan city and its suburbs from 2018 to 2023, Southeast Iran. Ethical guidelines for human research on children and adolescents: A narrative review study. Evaluation of the new modified apnea test in confirmation of brain death.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1