Unmet Family Planning Need Globally: A Clarion Call for Sharpening Current Research Frame Works.

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Open access journal of contraception Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAJC.S378042
Vijayan K Pillai, Julieann Lynn Nagoshi
{"title":"Unmet Family Planning Need Globally: A Clarion Call for Sharpening Current Research Frame Works.","authors":"Vijayan K Pillai, Julieann Lynn Nagoshi","doi":"10.2147/OAJC.S378042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Contraceptive use was a contentious issue during the course of the 19th century with it being illegal to provide contraception information in the US well into the 20th century. In a rapid about-face, the period that followed was marked by the introduction of several birth control methods as well as a feverish stage of contraceptive research and development. The impetus for the innovations in birth control technology was provided by Margaret Sanger, whose activism paved the way for the landmark 1965 Supreme Court case Griswold v. Connecticut which overturned the ban on contraceptives for married couples. In the 1900s, the family planning movement took hold in the US, during a period of intense concern over the socio-economic consequences of overpopulation, poverty, and insecurity, as foretold by Malthus more than two centuries ago. As early as the second decade of the twentieth century, organizations, such as the International Labor Organizations had declared “Poverty anywhere is poverty everywhere”. Partly as a measured defense against security concerns, Dr Reimert Ravenholt, the first director of the Office of Population at the US Agency for International Development (USAID), and Global family planning assistance program spearheaded a massive international family planning program primarily to contain poverty. He oversaw the disbursement of nearly 1.4 billion dollars for family planning programs worldwide during his 14 years at the office, 1965–1979. According to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), the largest bilateral donor of family planning assistance in 2018 was the United States, followed by the United Kingdom and Sweden. Nearly six decades since the entry of the family planning program on the world stage, the original mission of provision of suitable contraception for all women of reproductive age has not yet been realized. Furthermore, the family planning program vision as stated in SDG 3.7.1 was to guarantee all women currently aged 15 to 45 universal access to family planning information and education and sexual and reproductive health-care services under the national development strategies and programs. These targets are far from being met resulting in high levels of unmet need among women in reproductive age groups in developing countries. According to new estimates for the year 2019, sexual and reproductive health services in lowand middle-income countries (LMICs) are inadequate to meet the needs of their populations. The estimates for lowand middle-income countries indicate that approximately 218 million women of reproductive age (between 15 and 49 years old) have an unmet need for modern contraception. Furthermore, about 49% of pregnancies in LMICs, which amounts to 111 million annually, are unintended. In West & Central Africa, low coverage coexists alongside high unmet family planning. Family planning programs in LMICs, such as India, have responded to high levels of unmet need through an array of measures, such as improving the variety and mix of contraceptive methods; enhancing the availability, accessibility, and","PeriodicalId":74348,"journal":{"name":"Open access journal of contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f8/c6/oajc-14-139.PMC10364818.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open access journal of contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S378042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Contraceptive use was a contentious issue during the course of the 19th century with it being illegal to provide contraception information in the US well into the 20th century. In a rapid about-face, the period that followed was marked by the introduction of several birth control methods as well as a feverish stage of contraceptive research and development. The impetus for the innovations in birth control technology was provided by Margaret Sanger, whose activism paved the way for the landmark 1965 Supreme Court case Griswold v. Connecticut which overturned the ban on contraceptives for married couples. In the 1900s, the family planning movement took hold in the US, during a period of intense concern over the socio-economic consequences of overpopulation, poverty, and insecurity, as foretold by Malthus more than two centuries ago. As early as the second decade of the twentieth century, organizations, such as the International Labor Organizations had declared “Poverty anywhere is poverty everywhere”. Partly as a measured defense against security concerns, Dr Reimert Ravenholt, the first director of the Office of Population at the US Agency for International Development (USAID), and Global family planning assistance program spearheaded a massive international family planning program primarily to contain poverty. He oversaw the disbursement of nearly 1.4 billion dollars for family planning programs worldwide during his 14 years at the office, 1965–1979. According to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), the largest bilateral donor of family planning assistance in 2018 was the United States, followed by the United Kingdom and Sweden. Nearly six decades since the entry of the family planning program on the world stage, the original mission of provision of suitable contraception for all women of reproductive age has not yet been realized. Furthermore, the family planning program vision as stated in SDG 3.7.1 was to guarantee all women currently aged 15 to 45 universal access to family planning information and education and sexual and reproductive health-care services under the national development strategies and programs. These targets are far from being met resulting in high levels of unmet need among women in reproductive age groups in developing countries. According to new estimates for the year 2019, sexual and reproductive health services in lowand middle-income countries (LMICs) are inadequate to meet the needs of their populations. The estimates for lowand middle-income countries indicate that approximately 218 million women of reproductive age (between 15 and 49 years old) have an unmet need for modern contraception. Furthermore, about 49% of pregnancies in LMICs, which amounts to 111 million annually, are unintended. In West & Central Africa, low coverage coexists alongside high unmet family planning. Family planning programs in LMICs, such as India, have responded to high levels of unmet need through an array of measures, such as improving the variety and mix of contraceptive methods; enhancing the availability, accessibility, and
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未满足的全球计划生育需求:呼吁加强当前的研究框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Patient Perceived Quality of Virtual Group Contraception Counseling. Prevalence of Depression Among Women Using Hormonal Contraceptives in Mogadishu, Somalia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Is There Still a Role for Sterilization by Tubal Ligation as a Contraceptive Method? Contraception in Medically Complex Adolescents and Young Adults Contraceptive Utilization and Its Associated Factors Among Married Women in West African Countries: A Population-Based Survey Using Multinomial Logistic Regression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1