Optimizing the Reconstruction of Cardiac Potentials Using a Novel High Resolution Pericardiac Cage.

Jake A Bergquist, Wilson W Good, Brian Zenger, Jess D Tate, Rob S MacLeod
{"title":"Optimizing the Reconstruction of Cardiac Potentials Using a Novel High Resolution Pericardiac Cage.","authors":"Jake A Bergquist,&nbsp;Wilson W Good,&nbsp;Brian Zenger,&nbsp;Jess D Tate,&nbsp;Rob S MacLeod","doi":"10.22489/cinc.2019.441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Experimental preparations in which cardiac and torso recordings are made simultaneously typically do not have uniform sampling around the entire surface of the heart. To fill in the resulting gaps in coverage, signals captured from the sampled region are extended to the unsampled region of the heart before being utilized in computational models. The resulting errors have never been evaluated systematically. We explored this relationship using a novel experimental preparation, and compared the resulting measurements against a set of interpolation and optimization methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Measurements came from a modified Langenorff preparation in which we placed a rigid, heart shaped pericardiac cage electrode array around an isolated canine heart within an electrolytic torso-tank. Using the measured cage potentials we optimized a reconstruction from the subset of the cage below the base of the heart (ventricular) to the subset above it (atrial). This optimization minimized the difference between the reconstructed and measured signals. We then compared the reconstruction to a spatial Laplacian interpolation of the same potentials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Qualitative results show a high degree of agreement between optimized reconstructed potentials and measured potentials whereas the Laplacian interpolation resulted in poorer reconstructions in most cases. Calculated mean and maximum error were lower for optimization based approaches than spatial Laplacian interpolation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this study we aimed to utilize novel pericardiac cage recordings to investigate interpolation strategies from sampled signals to unsampled signals. We demonstrate that the sampled ventricular subset of signals is sufficient to reconstruct the atrial subset but that Laplacian interpolation does not achieve the level of accuracy that is possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":72683,"journal":{"name":"Computing in cardiology","volume":"46 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7051051/pdf/nihms-1561969.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computing in cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22489/cinc.2019.441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Introduction: Experimental preparations in which cardiac and torso recordings are made simultaneously typically do not have uniform sampling around the entire surface of the heart. To fill in the resulting gaps in coverage, signals captured from the sampled region are extended to the unsampled region of the heart before being utilized in computational models. The resulting errors have never been evaluated systematically. We explored this relationship using a novel experimental preparation, and compared the resulting measurements against a set of interpolation and optimization methods.

Methods: Measurements came from a modified Langenorff preparation in which we placed a rigid, heart shaped pericardiac cage electrode array around an isolated canine heart within an electrolytic torso-tank. Using the measured cage potentials we optimized a reconstruction from the subset of the cage below the base of the heart (ventricular) to the subset above it (atrial). This optimization minimized the difference between the reconstructed and measured signals. We then compared the reconstruction to a spatial Laplacian interpolation of the same potentials.

Results: Qualitative results show a high degree of agreement between optimized reconstructed potentials and measured potentials whereas the Laplacian interpolation resulted in poorer reconstructions in most cases. Calculated mean and maximum error were lower for optimization based approaches than spatial Laplacian interpolation.

Discussion: In this study we aimed to utilize novel pericardiac cage recordings to investigate interpolation strategies from sampled signals to unsampled signals. We demonstrate that the sampled ventricular subset of signals is sufficient to reconstruct the atrial subset but that Laplacian interpolation does not achieve the level of accuracy that is possible.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用新型高分辨率心包笼优化心脏电位重建。
简介:同时进行心脏和躯干记录的实验准备通常不会在整个心脏表面周围进行均匀采样。为了填补覆盖上的空白,从采样区域捕获的信号在用于计算模型之前被扩展到心脏的未采样区域。由此产生的误差从未被系统地评估过。我们使用一种新的实验制备方法探索了这种关系,并将结果测量结果与一组插值和优化方法进行了比较。方法:测量来自一种改良的Langenorff制剂,我们将一个刚性的心形心包笼电极阵列放置在一个电解躯干槽内的孤立犬心脏周围。利用测量的笼电位,我们优化了从心脏底部以下的笼亚区(心室)到其上方的笼亚区(心房)的重构。这种优化最小化了重建信号和测量信号之间的差异。然后,我们将重建与相同电位的空间拉普拉斯插值进行比较。结果:定性结果表明,优化后的重构电位与实测电位高度吻合,而拉普拉斯插值在大多数情况下重构电位较差。与空间拉普拉斯插值相比,基于优化方法的计算平均值和最大误差更小。讨论:在这项研究中,我们的目的是利用新的心包笼记录来研究从采样信号到未采样信号的插值策略。我们证明,采样的心室信号子集足以重建心房子集,但拉普拉斯插值并没有达到可能的精度水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transfer Learning for Improved Classification of Drivers in Atrial Fibrillation. Effects of Biventricular Pacing Locations on Anti-Tachycardia Pacing Success in a Patient-Specific Model. Deep Learning System for Left Ventricular Assist Device Candidate Assessment from Electrocardiograms. Capturing the Influence of Conduction Velocity on Epicardial Activation Patterns Using Uncertainty Quantification. Comparison of Machine Learning Detection of Low Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Using Individual ECG Leads.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1