A Mendelian randomisation, propensity score matching study to investigate causal association between serum homocysteine and intracranial aneurysm.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Stroke and Vascular Neurology Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1136/svn-2023-002414
Zhuohua Wen, Xin Feng, Xin Tong, Chao Peng, Anqi Xu, Haiyan Fan, Yiming Bi, Wenchao Liu, Zhenjun Li, Shenquan Guo, Fa Jin, Ran Li, Yanchao Liu, Shixing Su, Xin Zhang, Xifeng Li, Xuying He, Aihua Liu, Chuanzhi Duan
{"title":"A Mendelian randomisation, propensity score matching study to investigate causal association between serum homocysteine and intracranial aneurysm.","authors":"Zhuohua Wen, Xin Feng, Xin Tong, Chao Peng, Anqi Xu, Haiyan Fan, Yiming Bi, Wenchao Liu, Zhenjun Li, Shenquan Guo, Fa Jin, Ran Li, Yanchao Liu, Shixing Su, Xin Zhang, Xifeng Li, Xuying He, Aihua Liu, Chuanzhi Duan","doi":"10.1136/svn-2023-002414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Recent observational studies have reported that serum total homocysteine (tHcy) is associated with intracranial aneurysms (IAs). However, the causal effect of tHcy on IAs is unknown. We leveraged large-scale genetic association and real-world data to investigate the causal effect of tHcy on IA formation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) using publicly available genome-wide association studies summary statistics to investigate the causal relationship between tHcy and IAs, following the recommendations of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-MR statement. Furthermore, a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to evaluate the detailed effects of tHcy on risk of IA formation by utilizing real-world multicentre data, including 9902 patients with and without IAs (1:1 matched). Further interaction and subgroup analyses were performed to elucidate how tHcy affects risk of IA formation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MR analyses indicated that genetically determined tHcy was causally associated with IA risk (OR, 1.38, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.79; p=0.018). This is consistent with the more conservative weighted median analysis (OR, 1.41, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.93; p=0.039). Further sensitivity analyses showed no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy or heterogeneity of single nucleotide polymorphisms in causal inference. According to the PSM study, we found that, compared with low tHcy (≤15 µmol/L), moderate tHcy (>15-30 µmol/L) (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.93 to 2.36) and high tHcy (>30 µmol/L) (OR 3.66, 95% CI 2.71 to 4.95) were associated with a higher IA risk (p trend <0.001). Subgroup analyses demonstrated significant ORs of tHcy in each subgroup when stratified by traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Furthermore, there was also a synergistic effect of tHcy and hypertension on IA risk (p interaction <0.001; the relative excess risk due to interaction=1.65, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both large-scale genetic evidence and multicentre real-world data support a causal association between tHcy and risk of IA formation. Serum tHcy may serve as a biomarker to identify high-risk individuals who would particularly benefit from folate supplementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":22021,"journal":{"name":"Stroke and Vascular Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"202-211"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11221312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke and Vascular Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2023-002414","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Recent observational studies have reported that serum total homocysteine (tHcy) is associated with intracranial aneurysms (IAs). However, the causal effect of tHcy on IAs is unknown. We leveraged large-scale genetic association and real-world data to investigate the causal effect of tHcy on IA formation.

Methods: We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) using publicly available genome-wide association studies summary statistics to investigate the causal relationship between tHcy and IAs, following the recommendations of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-MR statement. Furthermore, a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to evaluate the detailed effects of tHcy on risk of IA formation by utilizing real-world multicentre data, including 9902 patients with and without IAs (1:1 matched). Further interaction and subgroup analyses were performed to elucidate how tHcy affects risk of IA formation.

Results: MR analyses indicated that genetically determined tHcy was causally associated with IA risk (OR, 1.38, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.79; p=0.018). This is consistent with the more conservative weighted median analysis (OR, 1.41, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.93; p=0.039). Further sensitivity analyses showed no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy or heterogeneity of single nucleotide polymorphisms in causal inference. According to the PSM study, we found that, compared with low tHcy (≤15 µmol/L), moderate tHcy (>15-30 µmol/L) (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.93 to 2.36) and high tHcy (>30 µmol/L) (OR 3.66, 95% CI 2.71 to 4.95) were associated with a higher IA risk (p trend <0.001). Subgroup analyses demonstrated significant ORs of tHcy in each subgroup when stratified by traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Furthermore, there was also a synergistic effect of tHcy and hypertension on IA risk (p interaction <0.001; the relative excess risk due to interaction=1.65, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.01).

Conclusion: Both large-scale genetic evidence and multicentre real-world data support a causal association between tHcy and risk of IA formation. Serum tHcy may serve as a biomarker to identify high-risk individuals who would particularly benefit from folate supplementation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项孟德尔随机化、倾向得分匹配研究,旨在调查血清同型半胱氨酸与颅内动脉瘤之间的因果关系。
背景和目的:最近的观察性研究报告称,血清总同型半胱氨酸(tHcy)与颅内动脉瘤(IAs)有关。然而,tHcy 对动脉瘤的因果关系尚不清楚。我们利用大规模遗传关联和真实世界的数据,研究了tHcy对IA形成的因果效应:方法:根据《加强流行病学观察性研究报告--MR声明》的建议,我们利用公开的全基因组关联研究摘要统计数据进行了双样本孟德尔随机化(MR),以研究 tHcy 与 IAs 之间的因果关系。此外,该研究还进行了倾向得分匹配(PSM)分析,利用现实世界中的多中心数据(包括9902名患有和未患有IA的患者(1:1匹配))评估tHcy对IA形成风险的详细影响。还进行了进一步的交互分析和亚组分析,以阐明 tHcy 如何影响 IA 的形成风险:MR分析表明,由基因决定的tHcy与IA风险存在因果关系(OR,1.38,95% CI 1.07至1.79;P=0.018)。这与更为保守的加权中位数分析结果一致(OR,1.41,95% CI 1.03 至 1.93;P=0.039)。进一步的敏感性分析表明,在因果推断中没有证据表明单核苷酸多态性存在水平多义性或异质性。根据 PSM 研究,我们发现与低 tHcy(≤15 µmol/L)相比,中度 tHcy(>15-30 µmol/L)(OR 2.13,95% CI 1.93 至 2.36)和高度 tHcy(>30 µmol/L)(OR 3.66,95% CI 2.71 至 4.95)与较高的 IA 风险相关(P 趋势 结论):大规模遗传学证据和多中心真实世界数据均支持 tHcy 与 IA 形成风险之间存在因果关系。血清 tHcy 可作为一种生物标志物,用于识别高风险人群,这些人群将特别受益于叶酸的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke and Vascular Neurology
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Stroke and Vascular Neurology (SVN) is the official journal of the Chinese Stroke Association. Supported by a team of renowned Editors, and fully Open Access, the journal encourages debate on controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine.
期刊最新文献
Association between stroke subtypes and outcomes of endovascular therapy: a post-hoc analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT Trial Optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy for minor stroke within 72 hours of symptom onset: a prospective cohort study Association between ASPECTS region of infarction and clinical outcome in non-acute large vessel occlusion ischaemic stroke after endovascular recanalisation Sex differences in the epidemiology of spontaneous and traumatic cervical artery dissections miR-19-3p/GRSF1/COX1 axis attenuates early brain injury via maintaining mitochondrial function after subarachnoid haemorrhage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1