University-Based Researchers as Knowledge Brokers for Climate Policies and Action.

Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-17 DOI:10.1057/s41287-022-00526-0
David Lewis, M Feisal Rahman, Revocatus Twinomuhangi, Shababa Haque, Nazmul Huq, Saleemul Huq, Lars Ribbe, Asif Ishtiaque
{"title":"University-Based Researchers as Knowledge Brokers for Climate Policies and Action.","authors":"David Lewis,&nbsp;M Feisal Rahman,&nbsp;Revocatus Twinomuhangi,&nbsp;Shababa Haque,&nbsp;Nazmul Huq,&nbsp;Saleemul Huq,&nbsp;Lars Ribbe,&nbsp;Asif Ishtiaque","doi":"10.1057/s41287-022-00526-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Responding effectively to climate crisis requires strong science-policy links to be put in place. Past research on the research-policy interface indicates longstanding challenges that have become more acute in the case of climate science, since this requires multi-disciplinary approaches and faces distinctive political challenges in linking knowledge with policy. What can be learned from the experiences of university-based researchers seeking to influence policy as they try to operate in the brokering space? With this in mind, an empirical study was designed to capture the detailed views and experiences of forty researchers in four universities across four countries-Bangladesh, Germany, Uganda and UK. It found a wide range of different researcher attitudes to policy engagement, diverse methods of engaging, a preference for working with government and civil society over private sector policy actors, and a perceived need for more university support. The findings suggest a need to rethink conditions for engagement to create spaces for knowledge exchange and cooperation that can contribute to policies for societal transformation. More attention also needs to be paid to interdisciplinary research approaches, improving research connections with private sector actors, and strengthening university research links with local communities. Finally, the position of university based researchers in the Global South will require strengthening to improve North-South knowledge exchange, capacity development, and incentives for policy engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":75001,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"35 3","pages":"656-683"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9112648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-022-00526-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Responding effectively to climate crisis requires strong science-policy links to be put in place. Past research on the research-policy interface indicates longstanding challenges that have become more acute in the case of climate science, since this requires multi-disciplinary approaches and faces distinctive political challenges in linking knowledge with policy. What can be learned from the experiences of university-based researchers seeking to influence policy as they try to operate in the brokering space? With this in mind, an empirical study was designed to capture the detailed views and experiences of forty researchers in four universities across four countries-Bangladesh, Germany, Uganda and UK. It found a wide range of different researcher attitudes to policy engagement, diverse methods of engaging, a preference for working with government and civil society over private sector policy actors, and a perceived need for more university support. The findings suggest a need to rethink conditions for engagement to create spaces for knowledge exchange and cooperation that can contribute to policies for societal transformation. More attention also needs to be paid to interdisciplinary research approaches, improving research connections with private sector actors, and strengthening university research links with local communities. Finally, the position of university based researchers in the Global South will require strengthening to improve North-South knowledge exchange, capacity development, and incentives for policy engagement.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学研究人员作为气候政策和行动的知识经纪人。
有效应对气候危机需要建立强有力的科学政策联系。过去对研究-政策界面的研究表明,气候科学面临的长期挑战变得更加严峻,因为这需要多学科的方法,并且在将知识与政策联系起来方面面临着独特的政治挑战。从大学研究人员试图在中介领域运作时影响政策的经历中可以学到什么?考虑到这一点,一项实证研究旨在收集孟加拉国、德国、乌干达和英国四个国家四所大学的40名研究人员的详细观点和经验,以及人们认为需要更多的大学支持。研究结果表明,有必要重新思考参与的条件,为知识交流与合作创造空间,为社会转型政策做出贡献。还需要更多地关注跨学科研究方法,改善与私营部门行为者的研究联系,并加强大学与当地社区的研究联系。最后,大学研究人员在全球南方的地位将需要加强,以改善南北知识交流、能力发展和政策参与的激励措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1