Using Administrative Data in Primary Care to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Continuing Professional Development Program Focused on the Management of Patients Living With Obesity.

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1097/CEH.0000000000000445
Boris Zevin, Rachael Morkem, Eleftherios Soleas, Nancy Dalgarno, David Barber
{"title":"Using Administrative Data in Primary Care to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Continuing Professional Development Program Focused on the Management of Patients Living With Obesity.","authors":"Boris Zevin,&nbsp;Rachael Morkem,&nbsp;Eleftherios Soleas,&nbsp;Nancy Dalgarno,&nbsp;David Barber","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are guidelines for referral to medical and/or surgical weight loss interventions (MSWLI) in Ontario; however, only about one-third of eligible patients in our region are being referred for consideration of MSWLI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A planning committee, including a registered dietician, psychiatrist, endocrinologist, bariatric surgeon, family physician, and educationalists, developed an interdisciplinary continuing professional development (CPD) program focused on practical approaches to the management of patients living with obesity. The Kirkpatrick model was used to evaluate the educational outcomes of the CPD program specifically focusing on Level-2, -3, and -4 outcomes based on self-reported questionnaire and health administrative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen primary care providers from the CPD program agreed to participate in this study, and 16 primary care providers (89%) completed the postintervention questionnaire and granted us access to their MSWLI referral data; 94% of study participants reported changes to their knowledge, comfort, and confidence (Level 2), as well as expected change in their future behaviour (Level 3) following the CPD program. However, there was no change in Kirkpatrick Level-4 outcomes, despite more than 90% of participants indicating that they will be making changes to their practice after the program.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The CPD program in our study was overwhelmingly well received and participants reported knowledge (Level 2) and behavioural (Level 3) changes following participation; however, there was no detectable change in their clinical practice (Level 4). The methodology described in our proof-of-concept study can be modified and adopted to evaluate Level-4 outcomes in other studies of effectiveness of CPD interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":"43 2","pages":"104-108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000445","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: There are guidelines for referral to medical and/or surgical weight loss interventions (MSWLI) in Ontario; however, only about one-third of eligible patients in our region are being referred for consideration of MSWLI.

Methods: A planning committee, including a registered dietician, psychiatrist, endocrinologist, bariatric surgeon, family physician, and educationalists, developed an interdisciplinary continuing professional development (CPD) program focused on practical approaches to the management of patients living with obesity. The Kirkpatrick model was used to evaluate the educational outcomes of the CPD program specifically focusing on Level-2, -3, and -4 outcomes based on self-reported questionnaire and health administrative data.

Results: Eighteen primary care providers from the CPD program agreed to participate in this study, and 16 primary care providers (89%) completed the postintervention questionnaire and granted us access to their MSWLI referral data; 94% of study participants reported changes to their knowledge, comfort, and confidence (Level 2), as well as expected change in their future behaviour (Level 3) following the CPD program. However, there was no change in Kirkpatrick Level-4 outcomes, despite more than 90% of participants indicating that they will be making changes to their practice after the program.

Discussion: The CPD program in our study was overwhelmingly well received and participants reported knowledge (Level 2) and behavioural (Level 3) changes following participation; however, there was no detectable change in their clinical practice (Level 4). The methodology described in our proof-of-concept study can be modified and adopted to evaluate Level-4 outcomes in other studies of effectiveness of CPD interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用初级保健管理数据评估持续专业发展项目对肥胖患者管理的有效性。
简介:安大略省有转诊到医疗和/或手术减肥干预(MSWLI)的指导方针;然而,在我们地区,只有约三分之一的符合条件的患者被转诊考虑MSWLI。方法:一个计划委员会,包括注册营养师、精神病学家、内分泌学家、减肥外科医生、家庭医生和教育学家,制定了一个跨学科的持续专业发展(CPD)计划,重点关注肥胖患者管理的实用方法。Kirkpatrick模型用于评估CPD项目的教育成果,特别关注基于自我报告问卷和健康管理数据的2级、3级和4级结果。结果:18名来自CPD项目的初级保健提供者同意参与本研究,16名初级保健提供者(89%)完成了干预后问卷调查,并允许我们访问他们的MSWLI转诊数据;94%的研究参与者报告了他们的知识、舒适度和信心的变化(2级),以及他们未来行为的预期变化(3级)。然而,尽管90%以上的参与者表示他们将在项目结束后改变他们的做法,但柯克帕特里克4级结果并没有变化。讨论:CPD项目在我们的研究中获得了压倒性的好评,参与者报告了参与后知识(2级)和行为(3级)的变化;然而,在他们的临床实践中没有可检测到的变化(4级)。我们的概念验证研究中描述的方法可以修改并用于评估其他CPD干预措施有效性的4级结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.
期刊最新文献
Differences in Physician Performance and Self-rated Confidence on High- and Low-Stakes Knowledge Assessments in Board Certification. Paving the Way Forward for Evidence-Based Continuing Professional Development. Development of a Communication Skills Training to Enhance Effective Team Communication in Oncology. Evolution of a Continuing Professional Development Program Based on a Community of Practice Model for Health Care Professionals in Resource-Limited Settings. Where do Physiotherapists Search for Information? Barriers in Translating Scientific Information into Clinical Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1