Emotion, Aging, and Decision Making: A State of the Art Mini-Review.

Joseph A Mikels, David B Taullahu
{"title":"Emotion, Aging, and Decision Making: A State of the Art Mini-Review.","authors":"Joseph A Mikels,&nbsp;David B Taullahu","doi":"10.20900/agmr20230003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past few decades, interest has begun to surge in understanding the role of emotion in decision making, and more recently in studies across the adult life span. Relevant to age-related changes in decision making, theoretical perspectives in judgment and decision making draw critical distinctions between deliberative versus intuitive/affective processes, as well as integral versus incidental affect. Empirical findings demonstrate the central role of affect in various decision-related domains such as framing and risk taking. To situate this review within an adult life-span context, we focus on theoretical perspectives in adult development regarding emotion and motivation. As a result of age differences in deliberative and emotional processes, taking a life-span perspective is critical to advance a comprehensive and grounded understanding of the role of affect in decision making. Age-related shifts in information processing from negative toward positive material also have consequential implications. By taking a life-span perspective, not only will decision theorists and researchers benefit, but so too will practitioners who encounter individuals of various ages as they make consequential decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72094,"journal":{"name":"Advances in geriatric medicine and research","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10193527/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in geriatric medicine and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20900/agmr20230003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Over the past few decades, interest has begun to surge in understanding the role of emotion in decision making, and more recently in studies across the adult life span. Relevant to age-related changes in decision making, theoretical perspectives in judgment and decision making draw critical distinctions between deliberative versus intuitive/affective processes, as well as integral versus incidental affect. Empirical findings demonstrate the central role of affect in various decision-related domains such as framing and risk taking. To situate this review within an adult life-span context, we focus on theoretical perspectives in adult development regarding emotion and motivation. As a result of age differences in deliberative and emotional processes, taking a life-span perspective is critical to advance a comprehensive and grounded understanding of the role of affect in decision making. Age-related shifts in information processing from negative toward positive material also have consequential implications. By taking a life-span perspective, not only will decision theorists and researchers benefit, but so too will practitioners who encounter individuals of various ages as they make consequential decisions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情绪、衰老和决策:一项最新研究综述。
在过去的几十年里,人们对理解情绪在决策过程中的作用的兴趣开始激增,最近又对成年人一生的研究产生了兴趣。与年龄相关的决策变化有关,判断和决策的理论观点在审慎过程与直觉/情感过程,以及整体影响与附带影响之间做出了关键区分。实证研究结果表明,情感在各种决策相关领域(如框架和风险承担)中发挥着核心作用。为了将这篇综述置于成人生命周期的背景下,我们将重点放在成人发展中关于情感和动机的理论观点上。由于审议和情感过程的年龄差异,采取生命周期的观点是至关重要的,以推进情感在决策中的作用的全面和接地气的理解。与年龄相关的信息处理从消极材料向积极材料的转变也有相应的影响。从生命周期的角度来看,不仅决策理论家和研究人员会受益,而且在做出重大决策时遇到不同年龄个体的从业人员也会受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Weakness Status is Differentially Associated with Time to Diabetes in Americans Falls and Alzheimer Disease. Meta-Analysis-Based Comparison of Annual Fall Risk between Older Adults with Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Sarcopenia as a Preoperative Risk Stratification Tool among Older Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Memory Loss and Missteps: Investigating Fall Risks in Alzheimer's and Dementia Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1