Managing public transport in developing countries: Stakeholder perspectives in Dar es Salaam and Faisalabad

M. Sohail , D.A.C. Maunder , D.W.J. Miles
{"title":"Managing public transport in developing countries: Stakeholder perspectives in Dar es Salaam and Faisalabad","authors":"M. Sohail ,&nbsp;D.A.C. Maunder ,&nbsp;D.W.J. Miles","doi":"10.1016/j.ijtm.2005.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Most developing country governments face the dilemma of how to promote affordable public transport for the urban poor. In developing countries, the trend of turning to the private sector for the provision of public transport services has resulted in a large number of individual operators whose main aim is (not surprisingly) to maximise profits. The drive for profitability can be achieved by increasing efficiency and cutting bloated costs, but may also lead to unfavourable behaviour that can adversely affect passenger safety and comfort and could also damage the urban environment. The challenge is to find a way to regulate and control this multiplicity of small businesses in such a way as to retain the cost minimisation pressures of the profit-seeking private sector without sacrificing safety, health or quality of service.</p><p>This paper presents a comparison of stakeholder attitudes to the regulation and control public transport in Dar es Salaam (Tanzania) and Faisalabad (Pakistan). The views of stakeholders were established as part of a wider DFID-sponsored study of ‘Partnerships to improve access and quality of urban public transport for the urban poor’ and were collected using content analysis, literature reviews, historical analysis, case studies, focus group discussions, forums and workshops. The stakeholders involved included users, particularly passengers from low-income households, providers and operators of services (drivers and conductors), and regulatory agencies. The example of the Faisalabad Urban Transport Society (FUTS), effectively a public–private partnership, is described to provide a useful model of regulation and control of private sector operators as well as for reconciling the interests of multiple stakeholders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100719,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transport Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijtm.2005.06.001","citationCount":"45","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transport Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471405105000224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

Abstract

Most developing country governments face the dilemma of how to promote affordable public transport for the urban poor. In developing countries, the trend of turning to the private sector for the provision of public transport services has resulted in a large number of individual operators whose main aim is (not surprisingly) to maximise profits. The drive for profitability can be achieved by increasing efficiency and cutting bloated costs, but may also lead to unfavourable behaviour that can adversely affect passenger safety and comfort and could also damage the urban environment. The challenge is to find a way to regulate and control this multiplicity of small businesses in such a way as to retain the cost minimisation pressures of the profit-seeking private sector without sacrificing safety, health or quality of service.

This paper presents a comparison of stakeholder attitudes to the regulation and control public transport in Dar es Salaam (Tanzania) and Faisalabad (Pakistan). The views of stakeholders were established as part of a wider DFID-sponsored study of ‘Partnerships to improve access and quality of urban public transport for the urban poor’ and were collected using content analysis, literature reviews, historical analysis, case studies, focus group discussions, forums and workshops. The stakeholders involved included users, particularly passengers from low-income households, providers and operators of services (drivers and conductors), and regulatory agencies. The example of the Faisalabad Urban Transport Society (FUTS), effectively a public–private partnership, is described to provide a useful model of regulation and control of private sector operators as well as for reconciling the interests of multiple stakeholders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展中国家的公共交通管理:达累斯萨拉姆和费萨拉巴德的利益相关者观点
大多数发展中国家政府都面临着如何为城市贫民推广负担得起的公共交通的难题。在发展中国家,转向私营部门提供公共交通服务的趋势导致了大量的个人经营者,其主要目的是(毫不奇怪)使利润最大化。盈利的动力可以通过提高效率和削减膨胀的成本来实现,但也可能导致不利的行为,可能对乘客的安全和舒适产生不利影响,也可能破坏城市环境。我们面临的挑战是找到一种方法来管理和控制这种多种多样的小企业,以保持追求利润的私营部门的成本最小化压力,同时又不牺牲安全、健康或服务质量。本文比较了达累斯萨拉姆(坦桑尼亚)和费萨拉巴德(巴基斯坦)的利益相关者对公共交通管制的态度。利益相关者的观点是英国国际发展部赞助的一项更广泛的研究的一部分,该研究名为“为城市穷人改善城市公共交通的使用和质量的伙伴关系”,并通过内容分析、文献综述、历史分析、案例研究、焦点小组讨论、论坛和讲习班收集。所涉及的利益攸关方包括用户,特别是来自低收入家庭的乘客、服务提供者和经营者(司机和售票员)以及监管机构。费萨拉巴德城市交通协会(FUTS)实际上是一种公私伙伴关系,它的例子为私营部门经营者的监管和控制以及协调多个利益攸关方的利益提供了有用的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Editorial board A model for holding strategy in public transit systems with real-time information Mapping out the potential for coordinated goods distribution in city centres: The case of Uppsala A review of deterministic, stochastic and hybrid vehicular exhaust emission models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1