Antimicrobial Prescribing Preparedness of Croatian Medical Students-Did It Change between 2015 and 2019?

Dora Palčevski, Andrej Belančić, Ivan Mikuličić, Eduard Oštarijaš, Robert Likić, Oliver Dyar, Vera Vlahović-Palčevski
{"title":"Antimicrobial Prescribing Preparedness of Croatian Medical Students-Did It Change between 2015 and 2019?","authors":"Dora Palčevski,&nbsp;Andrej Belančić,&nbsp;Ivan Mikuličić,&nbsp;Eduard Oštarijaš,&nbsp;Robert Likić,&nbsp;Oliver Dyar,&nbsp;Vera Vlahović-Palčevski","doi":"10.3390/medicines10070039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobials are some of the most prescribed drugs by junior doctors, but studies suggest most medical graduates feel unprepared for their future prescribing tasks. The aim of the present study was to compare the self-reported preparedness to prudently prescribe antimicrobials of final-year medical students in Croatia in 2015 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The same self-reported web-based survey on the preparedness to prescribe antibiotics was used in both 2015 and 2019. All final-year students at all four medical schools in Croatia (Osijek, Rijeka, Split, and Zagreb) were invited to participate in both 2015 and 2019. Preparedness scores were divided into \"topic preparedness scores\" and \"global preparedness scores\". Topic preparedness scores represented the percentage of students at a medical school who felt sufficiently prepared for each topic. They were first established at a medical school level and then at the national level. Global preparedness scores were determined for each student separately and then calculated at the medical school and national levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The country's global preparedness score, representing the average proportion of topics in which students felt sufficiently prepared, was slightly higher in 2015 compared with the 2019 results (62.7% vs. 56.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.191). Croatian students reported higher preparedness in 2015 than in 2019 for 25 out of 27 topics included in the survey. The majority of students reported a need for more education on antibiotic use both in 2015 and 2019 (78.0% vs. 83.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.199).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite increasing antimicrobial stewardship activities in various healthcare settings, medical students who are about to start prescribing antibiotics on their own do not feel sufficiently prepared to do so. Antimicrobial stewardship programs should be designed to incorporate undergraduate medical student education, for instance, as a specific, mandatory course or integrated into other courses, such as clinical pharmacology.</p>","PeriodicalId":74162,"journal":{"name":"Medicines (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10384637/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicines (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines10070039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobials are some of the most prescribed drugs by junior doctors, but studies suggest most medical graduates feel unprepared for their future prescribing tasks. The aim of the present study was to compare the self-reported preparedness to prudently prescribe antimicrobials of final-year medical students in Croatia in 2015 and 2019.

Methods: The same self-reported web-based survey on the preparedness to prescribe antibiotics was used in both 2015 and 2019. All final-year students at all four medical schools in Croatia (Osijek, Rijeka, Split, and Zagreb) were invited to participate in both 2015 and 2019. Preparedness scores were divided into "topic preparedness scores" and "global preparedness scores". Topic preparedness scores represented the percentage of students at a medical school who felt sufficiently prepared for each topic. They were first established at a medical school level and then at the national level. Global preparedness scores were determined for each student separately and then calculated at the medical school and national levels.

Results: The country's global preparedness score, representing the average proportion of topics in which students felt sufficiently prepared, was slightly higher in 2015 compared with the 2019 results (62.7% vs. 56.5%; p = 0.191). Croatian students reported higher preparedness in 2015 than in 2019 for 25 out of 27 topics included in the survey. The majority of students reported a need for more education on antibiotic use both in 2015 and 2019 (78.0% vs. 83.0%; p = 0.199).

Conclusions: Despite increasing antimicrobial stewardship activities in various healthcare settings, medical students who are about to start prescribing antibiotics on their own do not feel sufficiently prepared to do so. Antimicrobial stewardship programs should be designed to incorporate undergraduate medical student education, for instance, as a specific, mandatory course or integrated into other courses, such as clinical pharmacology.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克罗地亚医科学生抗微生物药物处方准备情况——2015年至2019年有变化吗?
背景:抗微生物药物是初级医生开得最多的药物之一,但研究表明,大多数医学毕业生对未来的处方任务感到措手不及。本研究的目的是比较2015年和2019年克罗地亚最后一年医科学生自我报告的谨慎开抗菌剂的准备情况。方法:2015年和2019年采用相同的基于网络的自我报告抗生素处方准备调查。克罗地亚所有四所医学院(奥西耶克、里耶卡、斯普利特和萨格勒布)的所有最后一年级学生都被邀请参加2015年和2019年的活动。准备得分分为“专题准备得分”和“全球准备得分”。主题准备分数代表了医学院学生对每个主题做好充分准备的百分比。它们首先在医学院一级建立,然后在国家一级建立。全球准备分数分别为每个学生确定,然后在医学院和国家层面计算。结果:与2019年的结果相比,2015年该国的全球准备得分(代表学生感到准备充分的主题的平均比例)略高(62.7%对56.5%;P = 0.191)。克罗地亚学生报告称,在调查涵盖的27个主题中,2015年有25个主题的准备程度高于2019年。2015年和2019年,大多数学生报告需要更多抗生素使用方面的教育(78.0%对83.0%;P = 0.199)。结论:尽管各种卫生保健机构的抗菌药物管理活动越来越多,但即将开始自己开抗生素处方的医学生并没有做好充分的准备。抗菌药物管理项目的设计应纳入本科医学生教育,例如,作为一个特定的,必修课程或整合到其他课程,如临床药理学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Breathing for Two: Asthma Management, Treatment, and Safety of Pharmacological Therapy during Pregnancy. GDF15 Targeting for Treatment of Hyperemesis Gravidarum. Deciphering Mechanisms, Prevention Strategies, Management Plans, Medications, and Research Techniques for Strokes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Cytokine Storm in COVID-19: Insight into Pathological Mechanisms and Therapeutic Benefits of Chinese Herbal Medicines. Incidence and Outcomes of COVID-19 Vaccine Hypersensitivity Reactions and Success of COVID-19 Vaccine Provocation Tests Post Previous COVID-19 Vaccine Hypersensitivity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1