[Comparative study on the essential composition content of commercial infant formula with the requirements in the new national food safety standard in China from 2017 to 2022].

Sana Liu, Yitong Liu, Pengfeng Qu, Aidong Liu, Dong Liang, Xuesong Xiang
{"title":"[Comparative study on the essential composition content of commercial infant formula with the requirements in the new national food safety standard in China from 2017 to 2022].","authors":"Sana Liu,&nbsp;Yitong Liu,&nbsp;Pengfeng Qu,&nbsp;Aidong Liu,&nbsp;Dong Liang,&nbsp;Xuesong Xiang","doi":"10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2023.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In order to understand the distribution of the essential nutrients content in commercial infant formula in China, and to compare its conformity with the new national standard(GB 10765-2021).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 477 infant fomulas with production data from January 2017 to June 2022 were collected in China. Information in the product labels was recorded and the distribution of nutrient contents was analyzed, compare with the national food safety standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with GB 10765-2010, the new standard had 12 essential nutrients content revised, and 10 of which had lower limit values adjusted and 5 of which had upper limit values adjusted. Both the lower and upper limits were increased for three items, including vitamin D, choline and selenium. Compared with the newly revised 12 essential nutrients in the national food safety standard, the coincidence rate of 3 items was 100%, and the coincidence rate of 3 items was more than 80%. The coincidence rate of the actual content of essential nutrients in some products was low, the reason was that they did not meet the lower limit requirements of the new national standard, for example, the non-coincidence rate of vitamin D was as high as 99.79%. In addition, the national food safety standard adjusts choline from an selectable nutrient to an essential one, and the proportion of choline added to commercial products was 84.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The change of the content of essential nutrients in the new standard has little influence on the products sold in our country. There are a few essential nutrient in the products on the market that need to be adjusted to raise the nutrient level.</p>","PeriodicalId":23789,"journal":{"name":"Wei sheng yan jiu = Journal of hygiene research","volume":"52 3","pages":"389-393"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wei sheng yan jiu = Journal of hygiene research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2023.03.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In order to understand the distribution of the essential nutrients content in commercial infant formula in China, and to compare its conformity with the new national standard(GB 10765-2021).

Methods: A total of 477 infant fomulas with production data from January 2017 to June 2022 were collected in China. Information in the product labels was recorded and the distribution of nutrient contents was analyzed, compare with the national food safety standard.

Results: Compared with GB 10765-2010, the new standard had 12 essential nutrients content revised, and 10 of which had lower limit values adjusted and 5 of which had upper limit values adjusted. Both the lower and upper limits were increased for three items, including vitamin D, choline and selenium. Compared with the newly revised 12 essential nutrients in the national food safety standard, the coincidence rate of 3 items was 100%, and the coincidence rate of 3 items was more than 80%. The coincidence rate of the actual content of essential nutrients in some products was low, the reason was that they did not meet the lower limit requirements of the new national standard, for example, the non-coincidence rate of vitamin D was as high as 99.79%. In addition, the national food safety standard adjusts choline from an selectable nutrient to an essential one, and the proportion of choline added to commercial products was 84.7%.

Conclusion: The change of the content of essential nutrients in the new standard has little influence on the products sold in our country. There are a few essential nutrient in the products on the market that need to be adjusted to raise the nutrient level.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
【2017 - 2022年商品婴儿配方奶粉基本成分含量与中国食品安全新国家标准要求的比较研究】。
目的:了解我国商品婴儿配方奶粉中必需营养素含量的分布情况,并比较其与新版国家标准(GB 10765-2021)的符合性。方法:收集2017年1月至2022年6月全国477份婴幼儿配方奶粉生产数据。记录产品标签信息,分析营养成分分布,并与国家食品安全标准进行比较。结果:与GB 10765-2010相比,新标准修订了12项必需营养素含量,调整了10项下限值,调整了5项上限值。维生素D、胆碱和硒等3个指标的下限和上限均有所提高。与食品安全国家标准新修订的12种必需营养素相比,3项符合率为100%,3项符合率超过80%。部分产品中必需营养素实际含量符合率较低,原因是不符合新国标的下限要求,如维生素D的不符合率高达99.79%。此外,国家食品安全标准将胆碱从可选营养素调整为必需营养素,胆碱在商品中的添加比例为84.7%。结论:新标准中必需营养素含量的变化对在我国销售的产品影响不大。市场上的产品中有一些必需营养素需要调整以提高营养水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Status of dietary energy and consumption of food among Chinese diabetics aged 45 years and above in 2015]. [Contamination and dietary exposure assessment of 2-chloropropanol esters in vegetable oils available on Zhejiang market during 2016-2020]. [Effect of different delivery modes on the level of protein, glucose and blood lipids in cord artery and vein blood]. [Secular trend in overweight and obesity among Chinese children and adolescents of 7-18 years old during 2000-2019]. [Rapid confirmation method of food poisoning caused by Bacillus cereus cereulide in rice and flour products].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1