Factors associated with poor mental health during mandatory home work: a cross-sectional study in university staff.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology Pub Date : 2023-07-28 DOI:10.1186/s12995-023-00382-6
Philippe Kiss, Marc De Meester, Ilse Vingerhoets, Bart Garmyn, Annemie Raemdonck
{"title":"Factors associated with poor mental health during mandatory home work: a cross-sectional study in university staff.","authors":"Philippe Kiss,&nbsp;Marc De Meester,&nbsp;Ilse Vingerhoets,&nbsp;Bart Garmyn,&nbsp;Annemie Raemdonck","doi":"10.1186/s12995-023-00382-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, a total lockdown of universities was implemented by the government in Belgium. University staff was required to work at home. The purpose of the study was to identify factors associated with poor mental health in university staff during mandatory home work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mental well-being of 702 university employees was assessed by need for recovery after work and presence of burnout symptoms. Following factors were considered: personal factors (gender, age), professional status, specific home work environment factors (quiet place to work, taking care of ill or old people, number of children < 12yrs. at home, family member at risk for Covid-19), work-private life balance and worries about long- and short-term work situation. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to calculate the odds ratios for the presence a high need for recovery and burnout symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The presence of a high need for recovery and the presence of burnout symptoms were significantly associated with poor work-private life balance (OR 5.14 and 2.80, respectively), no quiet place to work (OR 3.23 and 2.00, respectively) and being worried about long-term work situation (OR's increasing with increasing degree of worries). Being able to discuss the worries with the supervisor was only significant with a decreased risk of burnout symptoms for the lowest level of discussability with the supervisor. Following factors were not associated with both mental health outcomes: professional status, being worried about short-term work situation, taking care of ill or old people, number of children < 12yrs. at home and having a family member at risk for Covid-19.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When working at home special attention should be paid to work-private life balance and the presence of a quiet place to work. Additionally, in the case of mandatory home work in university personnel, specific worries about long-term work situation should be tackled. Universities and/or governments should provide measures to ensure an extension of research deadlines and, if applicable, job security.</p>","PeriodicalId":48903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology","volume":"18 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10375671/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-023-00382-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, a total lockdown of universities was implemented by the government in Belgium. University staff was required to work at home. The purpose of the study was to identify factors associated with poor mental health in university staff during mandatory home work.

Methods: Mental well-being of 702 university employees was assessed by need for recovery after work and presence of burnout symptoms. Following factors were considered: personal factors (gender, age), professional status, specific home work environment factors (quiet place to work, taking care of ill or old people, number of children < 12yrs. at home, family member at risk for Covid-19), work-private life balance and worries about long- and short-term work situation. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to calculate the odds ratios for the presence a high need for recovery and burnout symptoms.

Results: The presence of a high need for recovery and the presence of burnout symptoms were significantly associated with poor work-private life balance (OR 5.14 and 2.80, respectively), no quiet place to work (OR 3.23 and 2.00, respectively) and being worried about long-term work situation (OR's increasing with increasing degree of worries). Being able to discuss the worries with the supervisor was only significant with a decreased risk of burnout symptoms for the lowest level of discussability with the supervisor. Following factors were not associated with both mental health outcomes: professional status, being worried about short-term work situation, taking care of ill or old people, number of children < 12yrs. at home and having a family member at risk for Covid-19.

Conclusions: When working at home special attention should be paid to work-private life balance and the presence of a quiet place to work. Additionally, in the case of mandatory home work in university personnel, specific worries about long-term work situation should be tackled. Universities and/or governments should provide measures to ensure an extension of research deadlines and, if applicable, job security.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强制性家庭作业期间心理健康状况不佳的相关因素:一项针对大学员工的横断面研究。
背景:在2020年第一波新冠肺炎大流行期间,比利时政府对大学实施了全面封锁。大学工作人员被要求在家工作。这项研究的目的是确定大学员工在强制性家庭作业期间心理健康状况不佳的相关因素。方法:采用工作后恢复需求和倦怠症状对702名大学职工进行心理健康评估。考虑了以下因素:个人因素(性别、年龄)、职业地位、特定的家庭工作环境因素(安静的工作场所、照顾病人或老人、孩子的数量)高康复需求和倦怠症状的存在与工作-私人生活平衡差(OR分别为5.14和2.80)、没有安静的工作场所(OR分别为3.23和2.00)以及对长期工作状况的担忧(OR随担忧程度的增加而增加)显著相关。能够与主管讨论担忧,只有在与主管讨论的程度最低时,倦怠症状的风险才会降低。以下因素与两种心理健康结果无关:职业地位、担心短期工作状况、照顾病人或老人、子女数量。结论:在家工作时应特别注意工作与私人生活的平衡,并提供一个安静的工作场所。此外,对于大学职员的强制性家庭作业,应该解决对长期工作状况的具体担忧。大学和/或政府应采取措施,确保延长研究期限,并在适用的情况下确保工作保障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Aimed at clinicians and researchers, the Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology is a multi-disciplinary, open access journal which publishes original research on the clinical and scientific aspects of occupational and environmental health. With high-quality peer review and quick decision times, we welcome submissions on the diagnosis, prevention, management, and scientific analysis of occupational diseases, injuries, and disability. The journal also covers the promotion of health of workers, their families, and communities, and ranges from rehabilitation to tropical medicine and public health aspects.
期刊最新文献
Retention of nickel, cobalt and chromium in skin at conditions mimicking intense hand hygiene practices using water, soap, and hand-disinfectant in vitro. Long-term course and factors influencing work ability and return to work in post-COVID patients 12 months after inpatient rehabilitation. Associations between job demand-control-support and high burnout risk among physicians in Sweden: a cross-sectional study. The prevalence of respiratory symptoms and diseases and declined lung function among foundry workers. Psychological morbidity among coal miners compared to other occupations in Appalachia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1