Cybersecurity of medical devices: new challenges arising from the AI Act and NIS 2 Directive proposals.

International cybersecurity law review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-16 DOI:10.1365/s43439-022-00054-x
Elisabetta Biasin, Erik Kamenjašević
{"title":"Cybersecurity of medical devices: new challenges arising from the AI Act and NIS 2 Directive proposals.","authors":"Elisabetta Biasin,&nbsp;Erik Kamenjašević","doi":"10.1365/s43439-022-00054-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cyberattacks on the IT infrastructure of hospitals, electronic health records or medical devices that have taken place during the COVID-19 pandemic reaffirmed how crucial it is to ensure cybersecurity in the healthcare sector. Medical devices are regulated in the European Union (EU) through vertical product-specific legislation, such as the Medical Device Regulation (MDR), among others. The MDR foresees safety requirements implying cybersecurity obligations for medical device manufacturers. In 2021, the EU legislator put forward the Network and Information Security System Directive reform (NIS 2) and the Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) proposal, containing additional cybersecurity requirements applicable to medical devices. This article analyses how the new reforms interact with the existing legislation from a cybersecurity perspective. The research finds that parallel provision of analogous cybersecurity requirements (especially on notification requirements) could lead to regulatory overlapping, fragmentation, and uneven levels of protection of individuals in the EU internal market. In the \"Recommendations and conclusions\", the article provides policy recommendations to the EU legislator to help mitigate these risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":73412,"journal":{"name":"International cybersecurity law review","volume":"3 1","pages":"163-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108685/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International cybersecurity law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1365/s43439-022-00054-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Cyberattacks on the IT infrastructure of hospitals, electronic health records or medical devices that have taken place during the COVID-19 pandemic reaffirmed how crucial it is to ensure cybersecurity in the healthcare sector. Medical devices are regulated in the European Union (EU) through vertical product-specific legislation, such as the Medical Device Regulation (MDR), among others. The MDR foresees safety requirements implying cybersecurity obligations for medical device manufacturers. In 2021, the EU legislator put forward the Network and Information Security System Directive reform (NIS 2) and the Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) proposal, containing additional cybersecurity requirements applicable to medical devices. This article analyses how the new reforms interact with the existing legislation from a cybersecurity perspective. The research finds that parallel provision of analogous cybersecurity requirements (especially on notification requirements) could lead to regulatory overlapping, fragmentation, and uneven levels of protection of individuals in the EU internal market. In the "Recommendations and conclusions", the article provides policy recommendations to the EU legislator to help mitigate these risks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗设备的网络安全:人工智能法案和NIS 2指令提案带来的新挑战。
新冠肺炎大流行期间发生的针对医院IT基础设施、电子健康记录或医疗设备的网络攻击再次证明了确保医疗保健部门网络安全的重要性。医疗器械在欧盟(EU)通过垂直的特定产品立法进行监管,如《医疗器械条例》(MDR)等。MDR预见到安全要求意味着医疗器械制造商的网络安全义务。2021年,欧盟立法者提出了网络和信息安全系统指令改革(NIS 2)和《人工智能法》(AIA)提案,其中包含适用于医疗设备的额外网络安全要求。本文从网络安全的角度分析了新的改革如何与现有立法相互作用。研究发现,平行提供类似的网络安全要求(尤其是通知要求)可能会导致监管重叠、碎片化,以及欧盟内部市场对个人的保护水平不均衡。在“建议和结论”中,文章向欧盟立法者提供了政策建议,以帮助减轻这些风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cybersecurity Regulation—Types, Principles, and Country Deep Dives in Asia VAT/GST harmonisation challenges for digital assets such as bitcoin and NFTs in the EU following Case C-264/14 (Skatteverket v David Hedqist) Cyberstalking in Nigeria: An Exploratory Study of Section 24 of the Nigerian Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) (Amendment) Act, 2024 Shared intelligence, enhanced resilience: sharing cyber threat information and intelligence under DORA A multi-layered security model to counter social engineering attacks: a learning-based approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1