One step ahead: mapping the Italian and German cybersecurity laws against the proposal for a NIS2 directive.

International cybersecurity law review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-20 DOI:10.1365/s43439-022-00058-7
Sandra Schmitz-Berndt, Pier Giorgio Chiara
{"title":"One step ahead: mapping the Italian and German cybersecurity laws against the proposal for a NIS2 directive.","authors":"Sandra Schmitz-Berndt, Pier Giorgio Chiara","doi":"10.1365/s43439-022-00058-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the COVID-19 pandemic accelerating digital transformation of the Single Market, the European Commission also speeded up the review of the first piece of European Union (EU)-wide cybersecurity legislation, the NIS Directive. Originally foreseen for May 2021, the Commission presented the review as early as December 2020 together with a Proposal for a NIS2 Directive. Almost in parallel, some Member States strengthened (or adopted) national laws beyond the scope of the NIS Directive to respond adequately to the fast-paced digital threat landscape. Against this backdrop, the article investigates the national interventions in the field of cybersecurity recently adopted by Italy and Germany. In order to identify similarities and divergences of the Italian and German national frameworks with the European Commission's Proposal for a NIS2 Directive, the analysis will focus on selected aspects extrapolated from the Commission Proposal, namely: i) the enlarged scope; ii) detailed cybersecurity risk-management measures; iii) more stringent supervisory measures; and, iv) stricter enforcement requirements, including harmonised sanctions across the EU. The article concludes that the national cybersecurity legal frameworks under scrutiny already match the core of the proposed changes envisaged by the NIS2 Proposal.</p>","PeriodicalId":73412,"journal":{"name":"International cybersecurity law review","volume":"3 2","pages":"289-311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International cybersecurity law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1365/s43439-022-00058-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the COVID-19 pandemic accelerating digital transformation of the Single Market, the European Commission also speeded up the review of the first piece of European Union (EU)-wide cybersecurity legislation, the NIS Directive. Originally foreseen for May 2021, the Commission presented the review as early as December 2020 together with a Proposal for a NIS2 Directive. Almost in parallel, some Member States strengthened (or adopted) national laws beyond the scope of the NIS Directive to respond adequately to the fast-paced digital threat landscape. Against this backdrop, the article investigates the national interventions in the field of cybersecurity recently adopted by Italy and Germany. In order to identify similarities and divergences of the Italian and German national frameworks with the European Commission's Proposal for a NIS2 Directive, the analysis will focus on selected aspects extrapolated from the Commission Proposal, namely: i) the enlarged scope; ii) detailed cybersecurity risk-management measures; iii) more stringent supervisory measures; and, iv) stricter enforcement requirements, including harmonised sanctions across the EU. The article concludes that the national cybersecurity legal frameworks under scrutiny already match the core of the proposed changes envisaged by the NIS2 Proposal.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
领先一步:将意大利和德国的网络安全法与NIS2指令的提案进行对比。
随着新冠肺炎疫情加速单一市场的数字化转型,欧盟委员会也加快了对欧盟范围内第一项网络安全立法NIS指令的审查。委员会最初预计于2021年5月进行审查,最早于2020年12月提交了审查报告以及NIS2指令提案。几乎与此同时,一些成员国加强(或通过)了NIS指令范围之外的国家法律,以充分应对快节奏的数字威胁形势。在此背景下,本文调查了意大利和德国最近在网络安全领域采取的国家干预措施。为了确定意大利和德国国家框架与欧盟委员会NIS2指令提案的异同,分析将侧重于从委员会提案中推断出的选定方面,即:i)扩大的范围;ii)详细的网络安全风险管理措施;iii)更严格的监督措施;以及,iv)更严格的执法要求,包括在整个欧盟范围内统一制裁。文章的结论是,正在审查的国家网络安全法律框架已经符合NIS2提案所设想的拟议修改的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cybersecurity Regulation—Types, Principles, and Country Deep Dives in Asia VAT/GST harmonisation challenges for digital assets such as bitcoin and NFTs in the EU following Case C-264/14 (Skatteverket v David Hedqist) Cyberstalking in Nigeria: An Exploratory Study of Section 24 of the Nigerian Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) (Amendment) Act, 2024 Shared intelligence, enhanced resilience: sharing cyber threat information and intelligence under DORA A multi-layered security model to counter social engineering attacks: a learning-based approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1