Exploring the Ethical Considerations of Direct Contact in Pediatric Organ Transplantation: A Qualitative Study.

Q1 Arts and Humanities AJOB Empirical Bioethics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-27 DOI:10.1080/23294515.2022.2160513
Jordan Joseph Wadden, Jordan Hermiston, Tom D Blydt-Hansen, Ranjeet Dhaliwal, Shelby Gielen, Alice Virani
{"title":"Exploring the Ethical Considerations of Direct Contact in Pediatric Organ Transplantation: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Jordan Joseph Wadden, Jordan Hermiston, Tom D Blydt-Hansen, Ranjeet Dhaliwal, Shelby Gielen, Alice Virani","doi":"10.1080/23294515.2022.2160513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonanonymized direct contact between organ recipients and donor families is a topic of international interest in the adult context. However, there is limited discussion about whether direct contact should be extended to pediatric settings due to clinician and researcher concerns of the potential harms to pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed pediatric organ recipients, their families, and donorfamilies in British Columbia, Canada, to determine their views on direct contact. Interviews were conducted in two stages, with those who were further removed from the transplant process informing the approach to interviews with those who more recently went throughthe transplant process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine individuals participated in twenty in-depth interviews. The study included participants from three major organ systems: kidney, heart, and liver. Only five participants expressed that direct contact might cause harm or discomfort, while twenty-three indicated they saw significant potential for benefits. Nearly half focused on the harms to others rather than themselves, and nearly two-thirds focused on the benefits for others rather than themselves.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There appears to be a community desire for direct contact in pediatric organ transplant programs among those living in British Columbia, Canada. These results suggest a need to revisit the medical community's assumptions around protection and paternalism in our practice as clinicians and researchers.</p>","PeriodicalId":38118,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","volume":"14 3","pages":"143-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2022.2160513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nonanonymized direct contact between organ recipients and donor families is a topic of international interest in the adult context. However, there is limited discussion about whether direct contact should be extended to pediatric settings due to clinician and researcher concerns of the potential harms to pediatric patients.

Methods: We interviewed pediatric organ recipients, their families, and donorfamilies in British Columbia, Canada, to determine their views on direct contact. Interviews were conducted in two stages, with those who were further removed from the transplant process informing the approach to interviews with those who more recently went throughthe transplant process.

Results: Twenty-nine individuals participated in twenty in-depth interviews. The study included participants from three major organ systems: kidney, heart, and liver. Only five participants expressed that direct contact might cause harm or discomfort, while twenty-three indicated they saw significant potential for benefits. Nearly half focused on the harms to others rather than themselves, and nearly two-thirds focused on the benefits for others rather than themselves.

Conclusion: There appears to be a community desire for direct contact in pediatric organ transplant programs among those living in British Columbia, Canada. These results suggest a need to revisit the medical community's assumptions around protection and paternalism in our practice as clinicians and researchers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨儿童器官移植中直接接触的伦理考虑:一项定性研究。
背景:器官接受者和捐献者家庭之间的非匿名直接接触是成人背景下国际关注的话题。然而,由于临床医生和研究人员担心对儿科患者的潜在危害,关于是否应将直接接触扩大到儿科环境的讨论有限。方法:我们采访了加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的儿科器官接受者、他们的家人和捐赠者,以确定他们对直接接触的看法。访谈分两个阶段进行,那些被进一步排除在移植过程之外的人向最近经历移植过程的人提供访谈方法。结果:29人参加了20次深度访谈。这项研究包括来自三个主要器官系统的参与者:肾脏、心脏和肝脏。只有五名参与者表示,直接接触可能会造成伤害或不适,而二十三名参与者表示他们看到了巨大的好处潜力。近一半的人关注对他人的伤害而不是自己,近三分之二的人关注他人的利益而不是自己。结论:在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的居民中,社区似乎希望直接接触儿科器官移植项目。这些结果表明,在我们作为临床医生和研究人员的实践中,有必要重新审视医学界关于保护和家长式作风的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Animals is "Still Genetics": Perspectives of Genome Scientists and Policymakers on Animal and Human Enhancement. Associations Between the Legalization and Implementation of Medical Aid in Dying and Suicide Rates in the United States. Ethics Consultation in U.S. Pediatric Hospitals: Adherence to National Practice Standards. Monitored and Cared for at Home? Privacy Concerns When Using Smart Home Health Technologies to Care for Older Persons. Advance Medical Decision-Making Differs Across First- and Third-Person Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1