The Association Between Adherence to Insulin Therapy and Health Care Costs for Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Evidence from a U.S. Retrospective Claims Database.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.9.1081
Elizabeth L Eby, Sanjay Bajpai, Douglas E Faries, Virginia S Haynes, Maureen J Lage
{"title":"The Association Between Adherence to Insulin Therapy and Health Care Costs for Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Evidence from a U.S. Retrospective Claims Database.","authors":"Elizabeth L Eby, Sanjay Bajpai, Douglas E Faries, Virginia S Haynes, Maureen J Lage","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.9.1081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research has shown that many patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are not adherent to their medication regimen.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association between adherence to insulin therapy and all-cause health care costs for patients with T2D.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus Linkable to Ambulatory Electronic Medical Record data from January 1, 2012, through September 30, 2017. Patients were included if they were identified with T2D and initiated therapy on basal insulin (BAS) or basal-bolus (BAS-BOL) combination at any time from January 1, 2013, through October 1, 2016. Patients aged < 18 years, who used an insulin pump, identified as pregnant, or did not have continuous insurance coverage from 1 year before initiation on insulin therapy through 1 year after initiation were excluded. Descriptive statistics compared patient characteristics and costs (in U.S. 2017 dollars) between patients who were adherent or nonadherent to their insulin therapy in the 1-year postperiod, where adherence was defined as having proportion of days covered (PDC) of at least 80%. In addition, generalized linear models were used to compare costs between adherent and nonadherent patients, while controlling for patient characteristics, previous general health and comorbidities, resource utilization, medication use and type of insulin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13,296 patients were included in the BAS cohort (5,502 adherent; 7,794 nonadherent) and 10,069 in the BAS-BOL cohort (2,006 adherent; 8,063 nonadherent). Adherent patients had significantly lower all-cause total unadjusted costs following initiation on BAS ($29,322 vs. $31,888, <i>P</i> = 0.0134) and BAS-BOL combination ($36,229 vs. $40,147, <i>P</i> = 0.0078). Drug costs comprised 39.5%-45.4% of costs among adherent patients and 23.0%-25.9% of costs among nonadherent patients. Multivariable analyses revealed that adherent patients had significantly lower adjusted all-cause total costs than nonadherent patients in the BAS cohort ($30,127 vs. $37,049, 95% CI for difference -$8,460 to -$5,384) and the BAS-BOL cohort ($36,603 vs. $44,702, 95% CI for difference -$9,129 to -$6,980).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with T2D who initiated BAS or BAS-BOL combination therapy, adherence was associated with significantly lower all-cause total health care costs, despite significantly higher drug costs. These results illustrate the potential economic benefits associated with adherence to insulin therapy. DISCLOSURES\": Eli Lilly and Company funded this study and was responsible for study design and execution. Bajpai, Eby, Faries, and Haynes are employees and own stock in Eli Lilly and Company. Lage received compensation from Eli Lilly and Company for her work on this research project.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"26 9","pages":"1081-1089"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10390984/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.9.1081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research has shown that many patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are not adherent to their medication regimen.

Objective: To examine the association between adherence to insulin therapy and all-cause health care costs for patients with T2D.

Methods: This study used the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus Linkable to Ambulatory Electronic Medical Record data from January 1, 2012, through September 30, 2017. Patients were included if they were identified with T2D and initiated therapy on basal insulin (BAS) or basal-bolus (BAS-BOL) combination at any time from January 1, 2013, through October 1, 2016. Patients aged < 18 years, who used an insulin pump, identified as pregnant, or did not have continuous insurance coverage from 1 year before initiation on insulin therapy through 1 year after initiation were excluded. Descriptive statistics compared patient characteristics and costs (in U.S. 2017 dollars) between patients who were adherent or nonadherent to their insulin therapy in the 1-year postperiod, where adherence was defined as having proportion of days covered (PDC) of at least 80%. In addition, generalized linear models were used to compare costs between adherent and nonadherent patients, while controlling for patient characteristics, previous general health and comorbidities, resource utilization, medication use and type of insulin.

Results: 13,296 patients were included in the BAS cohort (5,502 adherent; 7,794 nonadherent) and 10,069 in the BAS-BOL cohort (2,006 adherent; 8,063 nonadherent). Adherent patients had significantly lower all-cause total unadjusted costs following initiation on BAS ($29,322 vs. $31,888, P = 0.0134) and BAS-BOL combination ($36,229 vs. $40,147, P = 0.0078). Drug costs comprised 39.5%-45.4% of costs among adherent patients and 23.0%-25.9% of costs among nonadherent patients. Multivariable analyses revealed that adherent patients had significantly lower adjusted all-cause total costs than nonadherent patients in the BAS cohort ($30,127 vs. $37,049, 95% CI for difference -$8,460 to -$5,384) and the BAS-BOL cohort ($36,603 vs. $44,702, 95% CI for difference -$9,129 to -$6,980).

Conclusions: In patients with T2D who initiated BAS or BAS-BOL combination therapy, adherence was associated with significantly lower all-cause total health care costs, despite significantly higher drug costs. These results illustrate the potential economic benefits associated with adherence to insulin therapy. DISCLOSURES": Eli Lilly and Company funded this study and was responsible for study design and execution. Bajpai, Eby, Faries, and Haynes are employees and own stock in Eli Lilly and Company. Lage received compensation from Eli Lilly and Company for her work on this research project.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人 2 型糖尿病患者坚持胰岛素治疗与医疗费用之间的关系:来自美国回顾性索赔数据库的证据。
背景:研究表明,许多2型糖尿病(T2D)患者并不坚持用药:目的:研究 2 型糖尿病患者坚持胰岛素治疗与全因医疗费用之间的关系:本研究使用的是 IQVIA PharMetrics Plus Linkable to Ambulatory Electronic Medical Record 数据,时间跨度为 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 9 月 30 日。从 2013 年 1 月 1 日到 2016 年 10 月 1 日的任何时间,如果患者被确定为 T2D 患者并开始使用基础胰岛素(BAS)或基础-胰岛素(BAS-BOL)联合疗法,则将其纳入研究范围。年龄小于 18 岁、使用胰岛素泵、确定怀孕或在开始胰岛素治疗前 1 年至开始治疗后 1 年期间没有连续投保的患者被排除在外。描述性统计比较了1年后坚持或不坚持胰岛素治疗的患者的特征和费用(以2017年美元计),其中坚持的定义是覆盖天数比例(PDC)至少达到80%。此外,在控制患者特征、既往一般健康状况和合并症、资源利用率、药物使用和胰岛素类型的同时,还使用了广义线性模型来比较坚持和不坚持治疗患者的费用:13,296 名患者被纳入 BAS 队列(5,502 名坚持治疗;7,794 名未坚持治疗),10,069 名患者被纳入 BAS-BOL 队列(2,006 名坚持治疗;8,063 名未坚持治疗)。坚持治疗的患者在开始使用 BAS(29,322 美元对 31,888 美元,P = 0.0134)和 BAS-BOL 组合(36,229 美元对 40,147 美元,P = 0.0078)后的全因未调整总费用明显较低。在坚持治疗的患者中,药物成本占成本的 39.5%-45.4%,而在未坚持治疗的患者中,药物成本占成本的 23.0%-25.9%。多变量分析显示,在BAS队列(30,127美元 vs. 37,049美元,95% CI差异为-8,460美元至-5,384美元)和BAS-BOL队列(36,603美元 vs. 44,702美元,95% CI差异为-9,129美元至-6,980美元)中,坚持治疗患者的调整后全因总费用显著低于非坚持治疗患者:在开始接受 BAS 或 BAS-BOL 联合疗法的 T2D 患者中,尽管药物成本明显较高,但坚持治疗可显著降低全因医疗保健总成本。这些结果说明,坚持胰岛素治疗具有潜在的经济效益。披露":礼来公司资助了这项研究,并负责研究的设计和实施。Bajpai、Eby、Faries 和 Haynes 是礼来公司的员工,并拥有礼来公司的股票。Lage 因参与本研究项目而从礼来公司获得报酬。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
期刊最新文献
Assessing factor consumption and bleeding outcomes of prophylaxis with 3 commonly prescribed factor IX products for hemophilia B: A retrospective patient medical record analysis in the United States. Drugs anticipated to be selected for Medicare price negotiation in 2026 for implementation in 2028. Health care resource utilization and costs of commercially insured US patients with atopic dermatitis switching from first-line to second-line systemic targeted therapies. Estimating the excess expenditures associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use among adults with diabetes in the United States. Using prescription medication utilization trends to evaluate health system resilience and inform future emergency preparedness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1