Health Utilities Index Mark 3 scores for children and youth: Population norms for Canada based on cycles 5 (2016 and 2017) and 6 (2018 and 2019) of the Canadian Health Measures Survey.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Reports Pub Date : 2023-02-15 DOI:10.25318/82-003-x202300200003-eng
Mariana Molina, Brittany Humphries, Jason R Guertin, David Feeny, Jean-Eric Tarride
{"title":"Health Utilities Index Mark 3 scores for children and youth: Population norms for Canada based on cycles 5 (2016 and 2017) and 6 (2018 and 2019) of the Canadian Health Measures Survey.","authors":"Mariana Molina,&nbsp;Brittany Humphries,&nbsp;Jason R Guertin,&nbsp;David Feeny,&nbsp;Jean-Eric Tarride","doi":"10.25318/82-003-x202300200003-eng","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Utility scores are an important tool for evaluating health-related quality of life. Utility score norms have been published for Canadian adults, but no nationally representative utility score norms are available for children and youth.</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) data from two recent cycles of the Canadian Health Measures Survey (i.e., 2016 and 2017, and 2018 and 2019) were used to provide utility score norms for children aged 6 to 11 years and adolescents aged 12 to 17 years. Children younger than 14 years answered the HUI3 under the supervision of an adult, while older children answered without supervision. Utility scores were reported as a weighted average (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) and median values (interquartile range). Utility scores were stratified by sociodemographic and medical characteristics of the child or adolescent. Regression analyses were used to identify predictors of utility scores. All results were weighted using sampling weights provided by Statistics Canada.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2,297,136 children aged 6 to 11 years and the 2,329,185 adolescents aged 12 to 17 years in the weighted sample, the average utility scores were 0.95 (95% CI: 0.94 to 0.95) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87 to 0.90), respectively. Approximately 60% of the children and 34% of the adolescents had a utility score of 1.00. Analyses identified several factors associated with utility scores (e.g., age, chronic condition and income levels), although differences were observed between children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This study provides utility score estimates based on a nationally representative sample of Canadian children and youth. Further research examining the determinants of utility scores of children and adolescents is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":49196,"journal":{"name":"Health Reports","volume":"34 2","pages":"29-39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202300200003-eng","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Utility scores are an important tool for evaluating health-related quality of life. Utility score norms have been published for Canadian adults, but no nationally representative utility score norms are available for children and youth.

Data and methods: Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) data from two recent cycles of the Canadian Health Measures Survey (i.e., 2016 and 2017, and 2018 and 2019) were used to provide utility score norms for children aged 6 to 11 years and adolescents aged 12 to 17 years. Children younger than 14 years answered the HUI3 under the supervision of an adult, while older children answered without supervision. Utility scores were reported as a weighted average (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) and median values (interquartile range). Utility scores were stratified by sociodemographic and medical characteristics of the child or adolescent. Regression analyses were used to identify predictors of utility scores. All results were weighted using sampling weights provided by Statistics Canada.

Results: Among the 2,297,136 children aged 6 to 11 years and the 2,329,185 adolescents aged 12 to 17 years in the weighted sample, the average utility scores were 0.95 (95% CI: 0.94 to 0.95) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87 to 0.90), respectively. Approximately 60% of the children and 34% of the adolescents had a utility score of 1.00. Analyses identified several factors associated with utility scores (e.g., age, chronic condition and income levels), although differences were observed between children and adolescents.

Interpretation: This study provides utility score estimates based on a nationally representative sample of Canadian children and youth. Further research examining the determinants of utility scores of children and adolescents is warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童和青少年健康公用事业指数3分:根据加拿大健康措施调查第5周期(2016年和2017年)和第6周期(2018年和2019年),加拿大的人口标准。
背景:效用评分是评估健康相关生活质量的重要工具。加拿大成年人的效用得分标准已经公布,但没有全国代表性的儿童和青少年效用得分标准。数据和方法:使用加拿大健康措施调查最近两个周期(即2016年和2017年以及2018年和2019年)的健康效用指数标记3 (HUI3)数据提供6至11岁儿童和12至17岁青少年的效用评分标准。14岁以下的儿童在成年人的监督下回答了HUI3,而大一点的儿童在没有监督的情况下回答了HUI3。效用得分以加权平均值(95%置信区间[ci])和中位数(四分位数范围)报告。效用评分根据儿童或青少年的社会人口学和医学特征进行分层。回归分析用于确定效用得分的预测因子。所有结果均使用加拿大统计局提供的抽样权重进行加权。结果:在加权样本中,2,297,136名6至11岁儿童和2,329,185名12至17岁青少年的平均效用得分分别为0.95 (95% CI: 0.94至0.95)和0.89 (95% CI: 0.87至0.90)。大约60%的儿童和34%的青少年效用得分为1.00。分析确定了与效用得分相关的几个因素(例如,年龄、慢性病和收入水平),尽管在儿童和青少年之间观察到差异。解释:这项研究提供了基于加拿大儿童和青少年全国代表性样本的效用评分估计。对儿童和青少年效用分数决定因素的进一步研究是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Reports
Health Reports PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Health Reports publishes original research on diverse topics related to understanding and improving the health of populations and the delivery of health care. We publish studies based on analyses of Canadian national/provincial representative surveys or Canadian national/provincial administrative databases, as well as results of international comparative health research. Health Reports encourages the sharing of methodological information among those engaged in the analysis of health surveys or administrative databases. Use of the most current data available is advised for all submissions.
期刊最新文献
Mental health and access to support among 2SLGBTQ+ youth. Updated breast cancer costs for women by disease stage and phase of care using population-based databases. Child care for young children with disabilities. From BpTRU to OMRON: The impact of changing automated blood pressure measurement devices on adult population estimates of blood pressure and hypertension. Trends in household food insecurity from the Canadian Community Health Survey, 2017 to 2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1