A systematic review and meta-analysis of pathogen reduction in onsite sanitation systems

IF 7.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Water Research X Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wroa.2023.100171
Isaac G. Musaazi , Shane McLoughlin , Heather M. Murphy , Joan B. Rose , Nynke Hofstra , Innocent K. Tumwebaze , Matthew E. Verbyla
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of pathogen reduction in onsite sanitation systems","authors":"Isaac G. Musaazi ,&nbsp;Shane McLoughlin ,&nbsp;Heather M. Murphy ,&nbsp;Joan B. Rose ,&nbsp;Nynke Hofstra ,&nbsp;Innocent K. Tumwebaze ,&nbsp;Matthew E. Verbyla","doi":"10.1016/j.wroa.2023.100171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The safe management of fecal sludge from the 3.4 billion people worldwide that use onsite sanitation systems can greatly reduce the global infectious disease burden. However, there is limited knowledge about the role of design, operational, and environmental factors on pathogen survival in pit latrines, urine diverting desiccation toilets, and other types of onsite toilets. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to characterize pathogen reduction rates in fecal sludge, feces, and human excreta with respect to pH, temperature, moisture content, and the use of additives for desiccation, alkalinization, or disinfection. A meta-analysis of 1,382 data points extracted from 243 experiments described in 26 articles revealed significant differences between the decay rates and T<sub>99</sub> values of pathogens and indicators from different microbial groups. The overall median T<sub>99</sub> values were 4.8 days, 29 days, &gt;341 days, and 429 days for bacteria, viruses, protozoan (oo)cysts, and <em>Ascaris</em> eggs, respectively. As expected, higher pH values, higher temperatures, and the application of lime all significantly predicted greater pathogen reduction rates but the use of lime by itself was more effective for bacteria and viruses than for <em>Ascaris</em> eggs, unless urea was also added. In multiple lab-scale experiments, the application of urea with enough lime or ash to reach a pH of 10 – 12 and a sustained concentration of 2,000 – 6,000 mg/L of non-protonated NH<sub>3<img></sub>N reduced <em>Ascaris</em> eggs more rapidly than without urea. In general, the storage of fecal sludge for 6 months adequately controls hazards from viruses and bacteria, but much longer storage times or alkaline treatment with urea and low moisture or heat is needed to control hazards from protozoa and helminths. More research is needed to demonstrate the efficacy of lime, ash, and urea in the field. More studies of protozoan pathogens are also needed, as very few qualifying experiments were found for this group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52198,"journal":{"name":"Water Research X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10214292/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research X","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589914723000075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The safe management of fecal sludge from the 3.4 billion people worldwide that use onsite sanitation systems can greatly reduce the global infectious disease burden. However, there is limited knowledge about the role of design, operational, and environmental factors on pathogen survival in pit latrines, urine diverting desiccation toilets, and other types of onsite toilets. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to characterize pathogen reduction rates in fecal sludge, feces, and human excreta with respect to pH, temperature, moisture content, and the use of additives for desiccation, alkalinization, or disinfection. A meta-analysis of 1,382 data points extracted from 243 experiments described in 26 articles revealed significant differences between the decay rates and T99 values of pathogens and indicators from different microbial groups. The overall median T99 values were 4.8 days, 29 days, >341 days, and 429 days for bacteria, viruses, protozoan (oo)cysts, and Ascaris eggs, respectively. As expected, higher pH values, higher temperatures, and the application of lime all significantly predicted greater pathogen reduction rates but the use of lime by itself was more effective for bacteria and viruses than for Ascaris eggs, unless urea was also added. In multiple lab-scale experiments, the application of urea with enough lime or ash to reach a pH of 10 – 12 and a sustained concentration of 2,000 – 6,000 mg/L of non-protonated NH3N reduced Ascaris eggs more rapidly than without urea. In general, the storage of fecal sludge for 6 months adequately controls hazards from viruses and bacteria, but much longer storage times or alkaline treatment with urea and low moisture or heat is needed to control hazards from protozoa and helminths. More research is needed to demonstrate the efficacy of lime, ash, and urea in the field. More studies of protozoan pathogens are also needed, as very few qualifying experiments were found for this group.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现场卫生系统病原体减少的系统回顾和荟萃分析
对全球34亿使用现场卫生系统的人的粪便污泥进行安全管理,可以大大减轻全球传染病负担。然而,关于设计、操作和环境因素对坑式厕所、尿液转移干燥厕所和其他类型的现场厕所中病原体存活的作用,了解有限。我们进行了一项系统的文献综述和荟萃分析,以表征粪便污泥、粪便和人类排泄物中病原体在pH、温度、水分含量以及干燥、碱化或消毒添加剂使用方面的减少率。对26篇文章中描述的243个实验中提取的1382个数据点进行的荟萃分析显示,不同微生物组的病原体和指标的衰变率和T99值之间存在显著差异。T99的总体中值分别为4.8天、29天和>;细菌、病毒、原生动物(oo)包囊和蛔虫卵分别为341天和429天。正如预期的那样,更高的pH值、更高的温度和施用石灰都显著地预测了更高的病原体减少率,但除非同时添加尿素,否则单独使用石灰对细菌和病毒比对蛔虫卵更有效。在多个实验室规模的实验中,施用含有足够石灰或灰烬的尿素,使pH值达到10-12,非质子化NH3N的持续浓度达到2000-6000 mg/L,与不使用尿素相比,可以更快地减少蛔虫卵。一般来说,粪便污泥储存6个月可以充分控制病毒和细菌的危害,但需要更长的储存时间或用尿素和低湿度或低热量进行碱性处理来控制原生动物和蠕虫的危害。需要更多的研究来证明石灰、灰烬和尿素在现场的功效。还需要对原生动物病原体进行更多的研究,因为这一组的合格实验很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water Research X
Water Research X Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
1.30%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Water Research X is a sister journal of Water Research, which follows a Gold Open Access model. It focuses on publishing concise, letter-style research papers, visionary perspectives and editorials, as well as mini-reviews on emerging topics. The Journal invites contributions from researchers worldwide on various aspects of the science and technology related to the human impact on the water cycle, water quality, and its global management.
期刊最新文献
Characterization of EPS subfractions from a mixed culture predominated by partial-denitrification functional bacteria Effectiveness of cyclic treatment of municipal wastewater by Tetradesmus obliquus – Loofah biofilm, its internal community changes and potential for resource utilization Enhanced nitrogen removal for low C/N wastewater via preventing futile carbon oxidation and augmenting anammox Evaluating energy balance and environmental footprint of sludge management in BRICS countries Pharmaceuticals in raw and treated water from drinking water treatment plants nationwide: Insights into their sources and exposure risk assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1