Kai Kai Ma, Aarthi Madhavan, Nicole M. Etter, Helene Hopfer, John E. Hayes
{"title":"Texture term usage and hedonic ratings in two age-diverse cohorts of Americans","authors":"Kai Kai Ma, Aarthi Madhavan, Nicole M. Etter, Helene Hopfer, John E. Hayes","doi":"10.1111/jtxs.12791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explores the use of food texture terms by adults in the northeastern United States. The purpose of the study was to compare the effect of food texture on food liking and texture term usage among age groups via two complementary online surveys that differed in the specific task given to participants. Survey 1 gathered common food items associated with 25 texture terms using open-ended questions from 345 participants (45% men, 55% women; age range = 20–79 years); it also collected liking scores for foods with these textures. Next, a new group of participants (<i>n</i> = 349, 46% men, 54% women; age range = 20–79 years) completed Survey 2, which asked them to match up to three texture terms to 32 different foods drawn from Survey 1, using a provided list of 35 texture terms. “Tough,” “Chalky,” and “Rubbery” had a negative impact on food liking scores while “Tender,” “Juicy,” and “Crispy” were associated with higher mean food liking scores. “Soft,” “Crunchy,” “Crispy,” “Juicy,” and “Greasy” were commonly used texture terms regardless of age. Within those aged 50–79 years, “Smooth,” “Tender,” “Crunchy,” “Soft,” “Moist,” “Crispy,” and “Creamy” were used more often while “Chalky,” “Rough,” “Mealy,” “Foamy/Airy,” “Gritty” were used less often. Our results identified commonly used texture terms and revealed differential usage in older and younger adults. These data deepen our understanding of the texture of foods in the modern food environment, highlighting how texture perception may vary with age.</p>","PeriodicalId":17175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of texture studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jtxs.12791","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of texture studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jtxs.12791","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explores the use of food texture terms by adults in the northeastern United States. The purpose of the study was to compare the effect of food texture on food liking and texture term usage among age groups via two complementary online surveys that differed in the specific task given to participants. Survey 1 gathered common food items associated with 25 texture terms using open-ended questions from 345 participants (45% men, 55% women; age range = 20–79 years); it also collected liking scores for foods with these textures. Next, a new group of participants (n = 349, 46% men, 54% women; age range = 20–79 years) completed Survey 2, which asked them to match up to three texture terms to 32 different foods drawn from Survey 1, using a provided list of 35 texture terms. “Tough,” “Chalky,” and “Rubbery” had a negative impact on food liking scores while “Tender,” “Juicy,” and “Crispy” were associated with higher mean food liking scores. “Soft,” “Crunchy,” “Crispy,” “Juicy,” and “Greasy” were commonly used texture terms regardless of age. Within those aged 50–79 years, “Smooth,” “Tender,” “Crunchy,” “Soft,” “Moist,” “Crispy,” and “Creamy” were used more often while “Chalky,” “Rough,” “Mealy,” “Foamy/Airy,” “Gritty” were used less often. Our results identified commonly used texture terms and revealed differential usage in older and younger adults. These data deepen our understanding of the texture of foods in the modern food environment, highlighting how texture perception may vary with age.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Texture Studies is a fully peer-reviewed international journal specialized in the physics, physiology, and psychology of food oral processing, with an emphasis on the food texture and structure, sensory perception and mouth-feel, food oral behaviour, food liking and preference. The journal was first published in 1969 and has been the primary source for disseminating advances in knowledge on all of the sciences that relate to food texture. In recent years, Journal of Texture Studies has expanded its coverage to a much broader range of texture research and continues to publish high quality original and innovative experimental-based (including numerical analysis and simulation) research concerned with all aspects of eating and food preference.
Journal of Texture Studies welcomes research articles, research notes, reviews, discussion papers, and communications from contributors of all relevant disciplines. Some key coverage areas/topics include (but not limited to):
• Physical, mechanical, and micro-structural principles of food texture
• Oral physiology
• Psychology and brain responses of eating and food sensory
• Food texture design and modification for specific consumers
• In vitro and in vivo studies of eating and swallowing
• Novel technologies and methodologies for the assessment of sensory properties
• Simulation and numerical analysis of eating and swallowing