Comparison of Perceived Self-efficacy, Benefits, and Barriers of Hypertension Control between Male and Female Patients Referred to Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center in Tehran.

Mahnaz Solhi, Zohreh Abbasi, Mahboobeh Rasouli, Nasim Naderi
{"title":"Comparison of Perceived Self-efficacy, Benefits, and Barriers of Hypertension Control between Male and Female Patients Referred to Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center in Tehran.","authors":"Mahnaz Solhi,&nbsp;Zohreh Abbasi,&nbsp;Mahboobeh Rasouli,&nbsp;Nasim Naderi","doi":"10.18502/jthc.v18i1.12582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension is a health problem. The purpose of the present study was to compare perceived self-efficacy, benefits, and barriers of hypertension control between male and female patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was carried out on 400 patients referred to Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center in Tehran from August 2020 through March 2021. The convenience sampling method was used. The data collection tools consisted of a digital sphygmomanometer, a demographic form, and a researcher-made questionnaire of perceived benefits, barriers, and self-efficacy of hypertension control, whose validity and reliability were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the male and female patients was 54.02±12.93 years and 56.48±12.10 years, respectively. The mean score of perceived barriers in women was lower than that in men, and the mean perceived self-efficacy in women was higher than that in men (P<0.001). According to the regression test, history of smoking in men and family history of hypertension and age in women were predictors of perceived benefits. Further, occupation and history of smoking in men and education level, family history of hypertension, and history of smoking in women were predictors of perceived barriers. Additionally, marital status, education level, and disease duration in men and education level, family history of hypertension, history of smoking, and age in women were predictors of perceived self-efficacy (P<0.050).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In men, the mean score of perceived barriers was higher and the mean score of perceived self-efficacy was lower. Additionally, the predictors of each of these perceptions were determined.</p>","PeriodicalId":39149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tehran University Heart Center","volume":"18 1","pages":"52-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/40/35/JTHC-18-52.PMC10225026.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tehran University Heart Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jthc.v18i1.12582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is a health problem. The purpose of the present study was to compare perceived self-efficacy, benefits, and barriers of hypertension control between male and female patients.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out on 400 patients referred to Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center in Tehran from August 2020 through March 2021. The convenience sampling method was used. The data collection tools consisted of a digital sphygmomanometer, a demographic form, and a researcher-made questionnaire of perceived benefits, barriers, and self-efficacy of hypertension control, whose validity and reliability were obtained.

Results: The mean age of the male and female patients was 54.02±12.93 years and 56.48±12.10 years, respectively. The mean score of perceived barriers in women was lower than that in men, and the mean perceived self-efficacy in women was higher than that in men (P<0.001). According to the regression test, history of smoking in men and family history of hypertension and age in women were predictors of perceived benefits. Further, occupation and history of smoking in men and education level, family history of hypertension, and history of smoking in women were predictors of perceived barriers. Additionally, marital status, education level, and disease duration in men and education level, family history of hypertension, history of smoking, and age in women were predictors of perceived self-efficacy (P<0.050).

Conclusion: In men, the mean score of perceived barriers was higher and the mean score of perceived self-efficacy was lower. Additionally, the predictors of each of these perceptions were determined.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德黑兰Rajaie心血管医学和研究中心的男性和女性高血压患者的自我效能感、益处和控制障碍的比较
背景:高血压是一种健康问题。本研究的目的是比较男性和女性患者高血压控制的自我效能感、益处和障碍。方法:这项横断面研究是在2020年8月至2021年3月期间对德黑兰Rajaie心血管医学和研究中心的400名患者进行的。采用方便抽样方法。数据收集工具包括数字血压计、人口统计表格和研究人员编制的高血压控制的感知益处、障碍和自我效能问卷,并获得其效度和信度。结果:男性患者平均年龄54.02±12.93岁,女性患者平均年龄56.48±12.10岁。女性障碍感知的平均得分低于男性,女性自我效能感的平均得分高于男性(p结论:男性障碍感知的平均得分更高,自我效能感的平均得分更低。此外,还确定了这些感知的预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Tehran University Heart Center
Journal of Tehran University Heart Center Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Hospitalization Rates due to Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis. Heart Xenotransplantation: Current Issues and Perspectives. Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Cardiomyopathy Patients with Right Bundle Branch Block. Association between Cardiovascular Risk Factors and High-Risk Features in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A Multicenter Study. Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension among 10663 Adults Based on the Baseline Data of the Kherameh Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1