[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-Radioligand Therapy Efficacy Outcomes in Taxane-Naïve Versus Taxane-Treated Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.
Swayamjeet Satapathy, Ranjit K Sahoo, Chandrasekhar Bal
{"title":"[<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-Radioligand Therapy Efficacy Outcomes in Taxane-Naïve Versus Taxane-Treated Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.","authors":"Swayamjeet Satapathy, Ranjit K Sahoo, Chandrasekhar Bal","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.123.265414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radioligand therapy (RLT) with <sup>177</sup>Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) inhibitors ([<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA) is currently approved for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after progression with at least 1 taxane and 1 androgen-receptor-pathway inhibitor. However, the impact of prior chemotherapy on [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT outcomes is debatable, with various studies showing inconsistent results. This study was conducted to precisely evaluate the impact of prior taxane chemotherapy on response and survival outcomes in mCRPC patients after [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT. <b>Methods:</b> This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were made using relevant key words, and articles up to December 2022 were included. The endpoints included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR), progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Individual patient data were pooled when feasible. Univariate odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted from the individual articles, and pooled estimates and 95% CIs were generated using metaanalysis. <b>Results:</b> Thirteen articles comprising 2,068 patients were included. In 6 articles (553 patients), taxane-naïve patients had significantly better odds of biochemical response after [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT (pooled OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.21-2.71). Individual patient data metaanalysis for PSA RRs in 3 articles revealed a significantly higher PSA RR in the taxane-naïve versus taxane-treated patients (57.1% vs. 39.5%; difference, 17.6%; 95% CI, 5.6%-28.9%). Further, taxane-naïve status was also a predictor of significantly better progression-free survival (5 articles; 1,027 patients; pooled HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.51-0.69) and OS (8 articles; 1,594 patients; pooled HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43-0.68) after [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT. There was no evidence of publication bias. <b>Conclusion:</b> mCRPC patients with no prior taxanes had significantly better outcomes after [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT than did taxane-treated patients. Further trials evaluating [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT in the taxane-naïve setting are now required.</p>","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"64 8","pages":"1266-1271"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.265414","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Radioligand therapy (RLT) with 177Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) inhibitors ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA) is currently approved for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after progression with at least 1 taxane and 1 androgen-receptor-pathway inhibitor. However, the impact of prior chemotherapy on [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT outcomes is debatable, with various studies showing inconsistent results. This study was conducted to precisely evaluate the impact of prior taxane chemotherapy on response and survival outcomes in mCRPC patients after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT. Methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were made using relevant key words, and articles up to December 2022 were included. The endpoints included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR), progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Individual patient data were pooled when feasible. Univariate odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted from the individual articles, and pooled estimates and 95% CIs were generated using metaanalysis. Results: Thirteen articles comprising 2,068 patients were included. In 6 articles (553 patients), taxane-naïve patients had significantly better odds of biochemical response after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT (pooled OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.21-2.71). Individual patient data metaanalysis for PSA RRs in 3 articles revealed a significantly higher PSA RR in the taxane-naïve versus taxane-treated patients (57.1% vs. 39.5%; difference, 17.6%; 95% CI, 5.6%-28.9%). Further, taxane-naïve status was also a predictor of significantly better progression-free survival (5 articles; 1,027 patients; pooled HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.51-0.69) and OS (8 articles; 1,594 patients; pooled HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43-0.68) after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT. There was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusion: mCRPC patients with no prior taxanes had significantly better outcomes after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT than did taxane-treated patients. Further trials evaluating [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT in the taxane-naïve setting are now required.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine (JNM), self-published by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), provides readers worldwide with clinical and basic science investigations, continuing education articles, reviews, employment opportunities, and updates on practice and research. In the 2022 Journal Citation Reports (released in June 2023), JNM ranked sixth in impact among 203 medical journals worldwide in the radiology, nuclear medicine, and medical imaging category.