Assessment of Knowledge About Patient Safety Concepts Among Medical and Pharmacy Students.

Areeg Abumostafa, Fadwa Abu Mostafa, Khaled Al-Kattan, Rana Alkateb, Aljohara Alayesh, Fatima Adem, Nada Salaas, Omar M Zeitouni, Mohamad S Alabdaljabar, Zarin Chowdhury
{"title":"Assessment of Knowledge About Patient Safety Concepts Among Medical and Pharmacy Students.","authors":"Areeg Abumostafa,&nbsp;Fadwa Abu Mostafa,&nbsp;Khaled Al-Kattan,&nbsp;Rana Alkateb,&nbsp;Aljohara Alayesh,&nbsp;Fatima Adem,&nbsp;Nada Salaas,&nbsp;Omar M Zeitouni,&nbsp;Mohamad S Alabdaljabar,&nbsp;Zarin Chowdhury","doi":"10.36401/JQSH-20-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient safety is a central principle of healthcare professional practice that requires a significant consideration within the teaching curricula; however, there is a lack of special courses that focus on patient safety concepts in an integrated way in many countries. This study aims to assess the knowledge of medical and pharmacy students regarding patient safety concepts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted at Alfaisal University during the 2018-2019 school year. A survey consisting of 15 questions was designed with the help of the quality and patient safety department at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh (KFSHRC). The survey was validated and then electronically distributed to all students enrolled in the College of Medicine and College of Pharmacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 304 (22%) of 1368 students completed the survey. The survey revealed that 51% of students had an acceptable understanding of the types of human error; however, 53% of students had little knowledge about the factors that lead to these errors and 61% did not know how to report an error. Many students (41%) reported being directly involved in an unsafe situation that may cause patient harm, such as a healthcare-related error, adverse event, or inconsistent care. Most students (90%) agreed that hiding errors to avoid further implications is unethical and reporting errors is the responsibility of every healthcare provider.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most Alfaisal University students understand the significance of patient safety education and understand the types of human errors, yet the causes of errors and the protocols for reporting them were not well understood by most students.</p>","PeriodicalId":73170,"journal":{"name":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","volume":"4 2","pages":"53-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228988/pdf/i2589-9449-4-2-53.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-20-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patient safety is a central principle of healthcare professional practice that requires a significant consideration within the teaching curricula; however, there is a lack of special courses that focus on patient safety concepts in an integrated way in many countries. This study aims to assess the knowledge of medical and pharmacy students regarding patient safety concepts.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Alfaisal University during the 2018-2019 school year. A survey consisting of 15 questions was designed with the help of the quality and patient safety department at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh (KFSHRC). The survey was validated and then electronically distributed to all students enrolled in the College of Medicine and College of Pharmacy.

Results: A total of 304 (22%) of 1368 students completed the survey. The survey revealed that 51% of students had an acceptable understanding of the types of human error; however, 53% of students had little knowledge about the factors that lead to these errors and 61% did not know how to report an error. Many students (41%) reported being directly involved in an unsafe situation that may cause patient harm, such as a healthcare-related error, adverse event, or inconsistent care. Most students (90%) agreed that hiding errors to avoid further implications is unethical and reporting errors is the responsibility of every healthcare provider.

Conclusion: Most Alfaisal University students understand the significance of patient safety education and understand the types of human errors, yet the causes of errors and the protocols for reporting them were not well understood by most students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医药学专业学生患者安全概念知识的评估。
患者安全是医疗保健专业实践的核心原则,需要在教学课程中进行重大考虑;然而,许多国家缺乏以综合方式关注患者安全概念的专门课程。本研究旨在评估医药学学生对病人安全概念的认知。方法:2018-2019学年在阿尔费萨尔大学进行横断面研究。在利雅得费萨尔国王专科医院和研究中心(KFSHRC)的质量和患者安全部门的帮助下,设计了一项由15个问题组成的调查。该调查经过验证,然后以电子方式分发给医学院和药学院的所有学生。结果:1368名学生中有304名(22%)完成了调查。调查显示,51%的学生对人为错误的类型有可以接受的理解;然而,53%的学生对导致这些错误的因素知之甚少,61%的学生不知道如何报告错误。许多学生(41%)报告直接参与了可能对患者造成伤害的不安全情况,例如医疗保健相关的错误、不良事件或不一致的护理。大多数学生(90%)同意隐瞒错误以避免进一步影响是不道德的,报告错误是每个医疗保健提供者的责任。结论:大多数Alfaisal大学的学生了解患者安全教育的重要性,了解人为错误的类型,但大多数学生并不了解错误的原因和报告方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Group Antenatal Care Start-Up in the Indian Private Sector: An Implementation Journey to Improve Quality of Care. Accreditation Made Easy: Step-by-Step Guide for Healthcare Institutions. Summary of the 5th International Pharmacoeconomics Forum. Community Health Needs Assessment of Primary Healthcare in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Prescribing Errors in an Ambulatory Care Setting: Mitigating Risks in Outpatient Medication Orders, Cross-Sectional Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1