Clinical research updates

IF 6.8 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Child and Adolescent Mental Health Pub Date : 2023-08-02 DOI:10.1111/camh.12658
Marinos Kyriakopoulos, Anastasia Kouklidou, Sofia Leopoulou, Kyriaki Stavrou
{"title":"Clinical research updates","authors":"Marinos Kyriakopoulos,&nbsp;Anastasia Kouklidou,&nbsp;Sofia Leopoulou,&nbsp;Kyriaki Stavrou","doi":"10.1111/camh.12658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Anastasia Kouklidou</p><p>European University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus</p><p>Early-onset psychosis (EOP) is defined by its onset before the age of 18 years. Negative symptoms, including decreased motivation, interest, and expressive functions such as alogia and blunted affect, are commonly present in EOP. Earlier onset of such symptoms is associated with a greater number of them at follow-up, and their severity is associated with poor outcomes. They also occasionally predominate in children and adolescents who are at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P). The identification of negative symptoms in children and adolescents with psychosis or at CHR-P can be challenging, their prevalence is unclear, and there is little evidence for their treatment.</p><p>Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis which aimed at providing meta-analytical evidence and a comprehensive review of the status and advances in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of negative symptoms in children and adolescents with EOP and at CHR-P. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology was used. Eligible studies were original studies, abstracts, conference proceedings, cross-sectional studies, longitudinal studies, randomized clinical trials, and other intervention studies providing information regarding negative symptoms in children and adolescents (mean age &lt; 18 years) with EOP or at CHR-P. Publication bias and heterogeneity among studies were assessed. A total of 133 studies with 9055 children and adolescents (mean age 15.5 years; 54.1% males) were included in the systematic review. The prevalence of negative symptoms in EOP was 61% and in CHR-P was 80%. A total of 20 studies (<i>N</i> = 1799 individuals) were further included in the meta-analysis. Negative symptoms were associated with poorer prognostic, functional, neurobiological, cognitive, and intervention outcomes in EOP and CHR-P. Sample prevalence of schizophrenia was not associated with high prevalence of negative symptoms. Obesity in EOP was associated with less severe negative symptoms. An improvement of negative symptoms was found at 12-month follow-up but not at 24 or ≥36 months compared with baseline in CHR-P. Clozapine may be more efficacious in reducing negative symptoms in treatment-resistant EOP compared to other antipsychotics. There is no consistent evidence in relation to comparative efficacy of other second-generation antipsychotics and no data on the efficacy of antidepressants in relation to negative symptoms in EOP. There is limited evidence favoring psychosocial interventions for negative symptoms. Early intervention services contribute to a reduction of negative symptom severity after 6–24 months compared with treatment as usual.</p><p>This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of negative symptoms in children and adolescents with EOP and at CHR-P. Negative symptoms are commonly present in CHR-P and are associated with poor clinical, functional, and intervention outcomes in EOP and CHR-P. Limitations of this study include characteristics of individual studies related to sample size, limited number of articles for some outcomes, heterogeneity of samples, design, methodology and quality of most studies, varied threshold for the presence and absence of negative symptoms, variability of mean age of participants, and possible differences regarding the expression of negative symptoms on the background of neurodevelopmental differences.</p><p>Salazar de Pablo, G., Catalan, A., Vaquerizo Serrano, J., Pedruzo, B., Alameda, L., Sandroni, V., … &amp; Correll, C.U. (2023). Negative symptoms in children and adolescents with early-onset psychosis and at clinical high-risk for psychosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. <i>British Journal of Psychiatry</i>, <i>17</i>, 1–13.</p><p>Sofia Leopoulou</p><p>Penteli Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece</p><p>Emotional dysregulation has been recognized as a risk factor linked to disordered eating and self-harm in young people. However, only a few prospective studies have explored this long-term, or considered potential mediators. Social cognition, emotional recognition, and bullying may underlie the association of emotional dysregulation with these adverse outcomes. By understanding potential mediating mechanisms, appropriate interventions addressing these can be developed.</p><p>Warne et al. (2023) used data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) in the UK in order to explore mediating pathways between emotional dysregulation in childhood, and disordered eating and self-harm in adolescence. The study sample included a total of 6934 children who had emotional dysregulation measured through the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Dysregulation Profile filled out by their mothers at mean age of 6 years 9 months. The outcomes, self-harm and disordered eating, were assessed during adolescence, at mean age of 16 years 8 months, through self-report questionnaires. Social cognition (at mean age of 7 years 8 months), emotion recognition (at mean age of 8 years 8 months), and bullying victimization (at mean age of 12 years 10 months) were studied as possible mediators. Potential confounding variables, including sex, socioeconomic disadvantage, maternal mental health, child general cognitive ability, and body mass index at mean age of 12 years 10 months were taken into account in the analysis.</p><p>The study identified emotional dysregulation in childhood being positively linked to disordered eating and self-harm in adolescence, with stronger associations observed after accounting for sex. The primary mediator between emotional dysregulation and these outcomes was social cognition. Bullying victimization was an important pathway to disordered eating in both males and females, and to self-harm in females. Indirect effects were stronger for disordered eating than self-harm. The study findings raise the possibility that interventions on improving emotional regulation and social cognition skills, and addressing bullying may prevent and contribute to the treatment of disordered eating and self-harm in adolescence.</p><p>This study has a few limitations that are related to the inclusion of any disordered eating rather than diagnosed eating disorders, the inability to differentiate self-harm with and without suicidal intent, and the inclusion of white and less socioeconomically disadvantaged children and young people. In addition, social cognition was measured close in time to the exposure and by using the same informant and bullying related to appearance or weight was not specifically measured. Finally, emotion regulation, social cognition, and emotion recognition may all be parameters of underlying neurodevelopment rather than causal of each other. As the authors did not statistically examine the difference in proportion mediated for males and females, any differences should be interpreted with caution.</p><p>Warne, N., Heron, J., Mars, B., Solmi, F., Biddle, L., Gunnell, D., … &amp; Bould, H. (2022). Emotional dysregulation in childhood and disordered eating and self-harm in adolescence: Prospective associations and mediating pathways. <i>Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry</i>, <i>64</i>, 797–806.</p><p>Kyriaki Stavrou</p><p>National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece</p><p>Children on the autism spectrum frequently display emotional and behavioral issues, which can be helped by behavioral parenting interventions. The COVID-19 pandemic and the associated lockdowns could offer grounds for a natural experiment to examine the long-term effects of such interventions.</p><p>Palmer et al. (2023) reported on the opportunistic follow-up of an existing cohort during COVID-19-related restrictions. The researchers examined the possibility of later effects of behavioral parenting interventions, while these did not have any major effect at primary study endpoint. Participants in the Autism Spectrum Treatment and Resilience (ASTAR) study, a parallel two-group, two-site pilot randomized controlled trial comparing predictive parenting to psychoeducational attention control were contacted again between June and September 2020, 2 years after the original randomization, and completed the same study endpoint measures of parent-reported child irritability and parenting stress. A small intervention effect was identified from baseline to COVID-19 follow-up favoring predictive parenting on parent-reported child irritability and parenting stress. Interview feedback on both interventions was positive, and parents reported using strategies from predictive parenting during COVID-19-related restrictions. They reported that the participation in those groups had led to a change in their daily experiences of parenthood.</p><p>Techniques from predictive parenting may have helped parents assist children with ASD cope with stressful and unpredictable situations like those arising during COVID-19, the parents spending more time with their children may have given them additional opportunities to apply these strategies, and the longer follow-up may have provided more time for parents to put recommendations into practice at home. It is also possible that predictive parenting techniques may have acted as a buffer against declining child mental health in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p>Limitations of the study included the fact that outcome measures were all parent-reported, and parents were not blinded to intervention arm. Follow-up questionnaires were not specifically sent with the aim of assessing the effects of the intervention but rather as part of questionnaires to assess the effect of the pandemic. This study highlighted the potential importance of the timing and the context when measuring the effects of parenting interventions in ASD.</p><p>Palmer, M., Carter Leno, V., Hallett, V., Mueller, J.M., Breese, L., Pickles, A., … &amp; Simonoff, E. (2023). Effects of a parenting intervention for emotional and behavioral problems in young autistic children under conditions of enhanced uncertainty: Two-year follow-up of a pilot randomized controlled trial cohort (ASTAR) during the United Kingdom COVID-19 pandemic. <i>Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry</i>, <i>62</i>, 558–567.</p><p>No ethical approval was required for these updates.</p>","PeriodicalId":49291,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":"28 3","pages":"466-467"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/camh.12658","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/camh.12658","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anastasia Kouklidou

European University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus

Early-onset psychosis (EOP) is defined by its onset before the age of 18 years. Negative symptoms, including decreased motivation, interest, and expressive functions such as alogia and blunted affect, are commonly present in EOP. Earlier onset of such symptoms is associated with a greater number of them at follow-up, and their severity is associated with poor outcomes. They also occasionally predominate in children and adolescents who are at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P). The identification of negative symptoms in children and adolescents with psychosis or at CHR-P can be challenging, their prevalence is unclear, and there is little evidence for their treatment.

Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis which aimed at providing meta-analytical evidence and a comprehensive review of the status and advances in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of negative symptoms in children and adolescents with EOP and at CHR-P. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology was used. Eligible studies were original studies, abstracts, conference proceedings, cross-sectional studies, longitudinal studies, randomized clinical trials, and other intervention studies providing information regarding negative symptoms in children and adolescents (mean age < 18 years) with EOP or at CHR-P. Publication bias and heterogeneity among studies were assessed. A total of 133 studies with 9055 children and adolescents (mean age 15.5 years; 54.1% males) were included in the systematic review. The prevalence of negative symptoms in EOP was 61% and in CHR-P was 80%. A total of 20 studies (N = 1799 individuals) were further included in the meta-analysis. Negative symptoms were associated with poorer prognostic, functional, neurobiological, cognitive, and intervention outcomes in EOP and CHR-P. Sample prevalence of schizophrenia was not associated with high prevalence of negative symptoms. Obesity in EOP was associated with less severe negative symptoms. An improvement of negative symptoms was found at 12-month follow-up but not at 24 or ≥36 months compared with baseline in CHR-P. Clozapine may be more efficacious in reducing negative symptoms in treatment-resistant EOP compared to other antipsychotics. There is no consistent evidence in relation to comparative efficacy of other second-generation antipsychotics and no data on the efficacy of antidepressants in relation to negative symptoms in EOP. There is limited evidence favoring psychosocial interventions for negative symptoms. Early intervention services contribute to a reduction of negative symptom severity after 6–24 months compared with treatment as usual.

This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of negative symptoms in children and adolescents with EOP and at CHR-P. Negative symptoms are commonly present in CHR-P and are associated with poor clinical, functional, and intervention outcomes in EOP and CHR-P. Limitations of this study include characteristics of individual studies related to sample size, limited number of articles for some outcomes, heterogeneity of samples, design, methodology and quality of most studies, varied threshold for the presence and absence of negative symptoms, variability of mean age of participants, and possible differences regarding the expression of negative symptoms on the background of neurodevelopmental differences.

Salazar de Pablo, G., Catalan, A., Vaquerizo Serrano, J., Pedruzo, B., Alameda, L., Sandroni, V., … & Correll, C.U. (2023). Negative symptoms in children and adolescents with early-onset psychosis and at clinical high-risk for psychosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 17, 1–13.

Sofia Leopoulou

Penteli Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece

Emotional dysregulation has been recognized as a risk factor linked to disordered eating and self-harm in young people. However, only a few prospective studies have explored this long-term, or considered potential mediators. Social cognition, emotional recognition, and bullying may underlie the association of emotional dysregulation with these adverse outcomes. By understanding potential mediating mechanisms, appropriate interventions addressing these can be developed.

Warne et al. (2023) used data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) in the UK in order to explore mediating pathways between emotional dysregulation in childhood, and disordered eating and self-harm in adolescence. The study sample included a total of 6934 children who had emotional dysregulation measured through the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Dysregulation Profile filled out by their mothers at mean age of 6 years 9 months. The outcomes, self-harm and disordered eating, were assessed during adolescence, at mean age of 16 years 8 months, through self-report questionnaires. Social cognition (at mean age of 7 years 8 months), emotion recognition (at mean age of 8 years 8 months), and bullying victimization (at mean age of 12 years 10 months) were studied as possible mediators. Potential confounding variables, including sex, socioeconomic disadvantage, maternal mental health, child general cognitive ability, and body mass index at mean age of 12 years 10 months were taken into account in the analysis.

The study identified emotional dysregulation in childhood being positively linked to disordered eating and self-harm in adolescence, with stronger associations observed after accounting for sex. The primary mediator between emotional dysregulation and these outcomes was social cognition. Bullying victimization was an important pathway to disordered eating in both males and females, and to self-harm in females. Indirect effects were stronger for disordered eating than self-harm. The study findings raise the possibility that interventions on improving emotional regulation and social cognition skills, and addressing bullying may prevent and contribute to the treatment of disordered eating and self-harm in adolescence.

This study has a few limitations that are related to the inclusion of any disordered eating rather than diagnosed eating disorders, the inability to differentiate self-harm with and without suicidal intent, and the inclusion of white and less socioeconomically disadvantaged children and young people. In addition, social cognition was measured close in time to the exposure and by using the same informant and bullying related to appearance or weight was not specifically measured. Finally, emotion regulation, social cognition, and emotion recognition may all be parameters of underlying neurodevelopment rather than causal of each other. As the authors did not statistically examine the difference in proportion mediated for males and females, any differences should be interpreted with caution.

Warne, N., Heron, J., Mars, B., Solmi, F., Biddle, L., Gunnell, D., … & Bould, H. (2022). Emotional dysregulation in childhood and disordered eating and self-harm in adolescence: Prospective associations and mediating pathways. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 64, 797–806.

Kyriaki Stavrou

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Children on the autism spectrum frequently display emotional and behavioral issues, which can be helped by behavioral parenting interventions. The COVID-19 pandemic and the associated lockdowns could offer grounds for a natural experiment to examine the long-term effects of such interventions.

Palmer et al. (2023) reported on the opportunistic follow-up of an existing cohort during COVID-19-related restrictions. The researchers examined the possibility of later effects of behavioral parenting interventions, while these did not have any major effect at primary study endpoint. Participants in the Autism Spectrum Treatment and Resilience (ASTAR) study, a parallel two-group, two-site pilot randomized controlled trial comparing predictive parenting to psychoeducational attention control were contacted again between June and September 2020, 2 years after the original randomization, and completed the same study endpoint measures of parent-reported child irritability and parenting stress. A small intervention effect was identified from baseline to COVID-19 follow-up favoring predictive parenting on parent-reported child irritability and parenting stress. Interview feedback on both interventions was positive, and parents reported using strategies from predictive parenting during COVID-19-related restrictions. They reported that the participation in those groups had led to a change in their daily experiences of parenthood.

Techniques from predictive parenting may have helped parents assist children with ASD cope with stressful and unpredictable situations like those arising during COVID-19, the parents spending more time with their children may have given them additional opportunities to apply these strategies, and the longer follow-up may have provided more time for parents to put recommendations into practice at home. It is also possible that predictive parenting techniques may have acted as a buffer against declining child mental health in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Limitations of the study included the fact that outcome measures were all parent-reported, and parents were not blinded to intervention arm. Follow-up questionnaires were not specifically sent with the aim of assessing the effects of the intervention but rather as part of questionnaires to assess the effect of the pandemic. This study highlighted the potential importance of the timing and the context when measuring the effects of parenting interventions in ASD.

Palmer, M., Carter Leno, V., Hallett, V., Mueller, J.M., Breese, L., Pickles, A., … & Simonoff, E. (2023). Effects of a parenting intervention for emotional and behavioral problems in young autistic children under conditions of enhanced uncertainty: Two-year follow-up of a pilot randomized controlled trial cohort (ASTAR) during the United Kingdom COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 62, 558–567.

No ethical approval was required for these updates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床研究进展
Anastasia kouklidou塞浦路斯欧洲大学,尼科西亚,塞浦路斯早发性精神病(EOP)的定义是其在18岁之前发病。消极症状,包括动机、兴趣和表达功能下降,如痛症和情感迟钝,通常出现在EOP中。这些症状的早期发作与随访时更多的症状相关,其严重程度与不良预后相关。他们也偶尔在临床精神病高风险的儿童和青少年中占主导地位(chrp)。识别患有精神病或chrp的儿童和青少年的阴性症状可能具有挑战性,其患病率尚不清楚,并且几乎没有治疗的证据。Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo等人(2022)进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,旨在提供荟萃分析证据,并全面回顾了儿童和青少年EOP和chrp阴性症状的诊断、预后和治疗的现状和进展。采用系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)方法。符合条件的研究包括原始研究、摘要、会议记录、横断面研究、纵向研究、随机临床试验和其他干预研究,这些研究提供了关于EOP或chrp儿童和青少年(平均年龄18岁)阴性症状的信息。评估研究的发表偏倚和异质性。共133项研究,9055名儿童和青少年(平均年龄15.5岁;54.1%男性)纳入系统评价。EOP阴性症状的发生率为61%,而chrp阴性症状的发生率为80%。总共20项研究(N = 1799人)被进一步纳入meta分析。阴性症状与EOP和chrp的预后、功能、神经生物学、认知和干预结果较差相关。精神分裂症的样本患病率与阴性症状的高患病率无关。EOP患者的肥胖与较轻的阴性症状相关。随访12个月时阴性症状有所改善,但随访24个月或≥36个月时阴性症状未见改善。与其他抗精神病药物相比,氯氮平在减轻难治性EOP的阴性症状方面可能更有效。关于其他第二代抗精神病药物的比较疗效,没有一致的证据,也没有关于抗抑郁药对EOP阴性症状的疗效的数据。支持对阴性症状进行社会心理干预的证据有限。与常规治疗相比,早期干预服务有助于在6-24个月后减轻阴性症状的严重程度。这是第一个关于EOP儿童和青少年及chrp患者阴性症状患病率的系统综述和荟萃分析。阴性症状通常出现在chrp中,并且与EOP和chrp的临床、功能和干预结果不佳相关。本研究的局限性包括与样本量相关的个别研究的特点,某些结果的文章数量有限,样本的异质性,大多数研究的设计、方法和质量,阴性症状存在和不存在的阈值不同,参与者平均年龄的可变性,以及在神经发育差异背景下阴性症状表达的可能差异。Salazar de Pablo, G., catalalan, A., Vaquerizo Serrano, J., Pedruzo, B., Alameda, L., Sandroni, V.,…柯瑞尔,C.U.(2023)。早发性精神病和精神病临床高危儿童和青少年的阴性症状:系统回顾和荟萃分析英国精神病学杂志,17,1-13。情绪失调已被认为是年轻人饮食失调和自残的风险因素。然而,只有少数前瞻性研究探索了这种长期的,或考虑了潜在的介质。社会认知、情绪识别和欺凌可能是情绪失调与这些不良后果之间关联的基础。通过了解潜在的中介机制,可以制定适当的干预措施来解决这些问题。Warne等人(2023)利用英国雅芳父母与儿童纵向研究(ALSPAC)的数据,探索儿童时期情绪失调与青少年时期饮食失调和自残之间的中介途径。研究样本共包括6934名患有情绪失调的儿童,他们的母亲在平均6岁9个月大的时候填写了《优势与困难问卷-情绪失调概况》。结果,自残和饮食失调,在青春期,平均年龄16岁8个月,通过自我报告问卷进行评估。 社会认知(平均年龄7岁8个月)、情绪识别(平均年龄8岁8个月)和欺凌受害(平均年龄12岁10个月)被研究为可能的中介。在分析中考虑了潜在的混杂变量,包括性别、社会经济劣势、孕产妇心理健康、儿童一般认知能力和平均年龄12岁至10个月时的体重指数。研究发现,童年时期的情绪失调与青少年时期的饮食失调和自我伤害呈正相关,在考虑到性因素后,这种关联更强。情绪失调与这些结果之间的主要中介是社会认知。欺凌受害者是男性和女性饮食失调和女性自我伤害的重要途径。饮食失调的间接影响比自我伤害更强。研究结果提出了一种可能性,即提高情绪调节和社会认知技能的干预措施,以及解决欺凌问题,可能会预防和促进青少年饮食失调和自我伤害的治疗。这项研究有一些局限性,包括任何饮食失调而不是诊断的饮食失调,无法区分有自杀意图和没有自杀意图的自残,以及包括白人和社会经济地位较低的儿童和年轻人。此外,社会认知是在接近暴露的时间内测量的,通过使用相同的信息提供者,与外表或体重有关的欺凌没有具体测量。最后,情绪调节、社会认知和情绪识别可能都是潜在神经发育的参数,而不是彼此的因果关系。由于作者没有统计地检查男性和女性的比例差异,任何差异都应谨慎解释。沃恩,N.,赫伦,J.,马尔斯,B.,索尔米,F.,比德尔,L.,甘奈尔,D.,…Bould, H.(2022)。儿童时期的情绪失调和青少年时期的饮食失调和自我伤害:前瞻性关联和中介途径。儿童心理与精神病学杂志,64,797-806。希腊雅典国立和卡波迪斯特里亚大学患有自闭症的儿童经常表现出情绪和行为问题,这可以通过行为父母干预来帮助他们。COVID-19大流行和相关的封锁可以为一项自然实验提供基础,以检验此类干预措施的长期影响。Palmer等人(2023)报告了在covid -19相关限制期间对现有队列的机会性随访。研究人员检查了行为父母干预的后续影响的可能性,而这些在主要研究终点没有任何主要影响。自闭症谱系治疗和恢复力(ASTAR)研究是一项平行的两组、两地试点随机对照试验,比较了预测性育儿与心理教育注意控制。在最初的随机化两年后,即2020年6月至9月,研究人员再次联系了参与者,并完成了相同的研究终点,即父母报告的孩子易怒和父母压力。从基线到COVID-19随访期间,发现了一个小的干预效果,有利于预测性育儿对父母报告的孩子易怒和育儿压力的影响。对这两种干预措施的访谈反馈都是积极的,家长们报告说,在covid -19相关限制期间,他们采用了预测性育儿策略。他们报告说,参加这些小组使他们的日常为人父母经历发生了变化。预测性育儿技术可能帮助父母帮助自闭症儿童应对压力和不可预测的情况,如COVID-19期间出现的情况,父母花更多的时间与孩子在一起可能给他们更多的机会应用这些策略,更长的随访可能为父母提供更多的时间将建议付诸实践。在2019冠状病毒病大流行的背景下,预测性育儿技术也可能起到了缓冲儿童心理健康下降的作用。该研究的局限性包括结果测量都是由父母报告的,并且父母没有对干预组盲目。后续调查问卷不是专门为了评估干预措施的效果而发出的,而是作为评估大流行病影响的调查问卷的一部分发出的。这项研究强调了在衡量父母干预对ASD的影响时,时间和背景的潜在重要性。Palmer, M., Carter Leno, V., Hallett, V., Mueller, J.M., Breese, L., Pickles, A., & &;西蒙诺夫,E.(2023)。 在不确定性增强的条件下,父母干预对年幼自闭症儿童情绪和行为问题的影响:英国COVID-19大流行期间一项试点随机对照试验队列(ASTAR)的两年随访美国儿童与青少年精神病学学会杂志,62,558-567。这些更新不需要伦理批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Child and Adolescent Mental Health PEDIATRICS-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
77
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMH) publishes high quality, peer-reviewed child and adolescent mental health services research of relevance to academics, clinicians and commissioners internationally. The journal''s principal aim is to foster evidence-based clinical practice and clinically orientated research among clinicians and health services researchers working with children and adolescents, parents and their families in relation to or with a particular interest in mental health. CAMH publishes reviews, original articles, and pilot reports of innovative approaches, interventions, clinical methods and service developments. The journal has regular sections on Measurement Issues, Innovations in Practice, Global Child Mental Health and Humanities. All published papers should be of direct relevance to mental health practitioners and clearly draw out clinical implications for the field.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the editor: 'To seclude or not to seclude, is that the question?' A commentary on Yurtbasi et al. (2024). Issue Information Editorial: Advancing equity, diversity and inclusion through culturally sensitive collaboration and training Clinical research updates Debate: Bridging the gap – role of nonspecialists in child and adolescent mental health care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1