Bacterial symbiont diversity in Arctic seep Oligobrachia siboglinids.

IF 4.9 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Animal microbiome Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1186/s42523-023-00251-x
Arunima Sen, Gwenn Tanguy, Pierre E Galand, Ann C Andersen, Stéphane Hourdez
{"title":"Bacterial symbiont diversity in Arctic seep Oligobrachia siboglinids.","authors":"Arunima Sen,&nbsp;Gwenn Tanguy,&nbsp;Pierre E Galand,&nbsp;Ann C Andersen,&nbsp;Stéphane Hourdez","doi":"10.1186/s42523-023-00251-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High latitude seeps are dominated by Oligobrachia siboglinid worms. Since these worms are often the sole chemosymbiotrophic taxon present (they host chemosynthetic bacteria within the trophosome organ in their trunk region), a key question in the study of high latitude seep ecology has been whether they harbor methanotrophic symbionts. This debate has manifested due to the mismatch between stable carbon isotope signatures of the worms (lower than -50‰ and usually indicative of methanotrophic symbioses) and the lack of molecular or microscopic evidence for methanotrophic symbionts. Two hypotheses have circulated to explain this paradox: (1) the uptake of sediment carbon compounds with depleted δC<sup>13</sup> values from the seep environment, and (2) a small, but significant and difficult to detect population of methanotrophic symbionts. We conducted 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of the V3-V4 regions on two species of northern seep Oligobrachia (Oligobrachia webbi and Oligobrachia sp. CPL-clade), from four different high latitude sites, to investigate the latter hypothesis. We also visually checked the worms' symbiotic bacteria within the symbiont-hosting organ, the trophosome, through transmission electron microscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The vast majority of the obtained reads corresponded to sulfide-oxidizers and only a very small proportion of the reads pertained to methane-oxidizers, which suggests a lack of methanotrophic symbionts. A number of sulfur oxidizing bacterial strains were recovered from the different worms, however, host individuals tended to possess a single strain, or sometimes two closely-related strains. However, strains did not correspond specifically with either of the two Oligobrachia species we investigated. Water depth could play a role in determining local sediment bacterial communities that were opportunistically taken up by the worms. Bacteria were abundant in non-trophosome (and thereby symbiont-free) tissue and are likely epibiotic or tube bacterial communities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The absence of methanotrophic bacterial sequences in the trophosome of Arctic and north Atlantic seep Oligobrachia likely indicates a lack of methanotrophic symbionts in these worms, which suggests that nutrition is sulfur-based. This is turn implies that sediment carbon uptake is responsible for the low δ<sup>13</sup>C values of these animals. Furthermore, endosymbiotic partners could be locally determined, and possibly only represent a fraction of all bacterial sequences obtained from tissues of these (and other) species of frenulates.</p>","PeriodicalId":72201,"journal":{"name":"Animal microbiome","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10236654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-023-00251-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High latitude seeps are dominated by Oligobrachia siboglinid worms. Since these worms are often the sole chemosymbiotrophic taxon present (they host chemosynthetic bacteria within the trophosome organ in their trunk region), a key question in the study of high latitude seep ecology has been whether they harbor methanotrophic symbionts. This debate has manifested due to the mismatch between stable carbon isotope signatures of the worms (lower than -50‰ and usually indicative of methanotrophic symbioses) and the lack of molecular or microscopic evidence for methanotrophic symbionts. Two hypotheses have circulated to explain this paradox: (1) the uptake of sediment carbon compounds with depleted δC13 values from the seep environment, and (2) a small, but significant and difficult to detect population of methanotrophic symbionts. We conducted 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of the V3-V4 regions on two species of northern seep Oligobrachia (Oligobrachia webbi and Oligobrachia sp. CPL-clade), from four different high latitude sites, to investigate the latter hypothesis. We also visually checked the worms' symbiotic bacteria within the symbiont-hosting organ, the trophosome, through transmission electron microscopy.

Results: The vast majority of the obtained reads corresponded to sulfide-oxidizers and only a very small proportion of the reads pertained to methane-oxidizers, which suggests a lack of methanotrophic symbionts. A number of sulfur oxidizing bacterial strains were recovered from the different worms, however, host individuals tended to possess a single strain, or sometimes two closely-related strains. However, strains did not correspond specifically with either of the two Oligobrachia species we investigated. Water depth could play a role in determining local sediment bacterial communities that were opportunistically taken up by the worms. Bacteria were abundant in non-trophosome (and thereby symbiont-free) tissue and are likely epibiotic or tube bacterial communities.

Conclusions: The absence of methanotrophic bacterial sequences in the trophosome of Arctic and north Atlantic seep Oligobrachia likely indicates a lack of methanotrophic symbionts in these worms, which suggests that nutrition is sulfur-based. This is turn implies that sediment carbon uptake is responsible for the low δ13C values of these animals. Furthermore, endosymbiotic partners could be locally determined, and possibly only represent a fraction of all bacterial sequences obtained from tissues of these (and other) species of frenulates.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
北极深海中细菌共生体的多样性。
背景:高纬度地区的渗滤主要由Oligobrachia siboglinid蠕虫控制。由于这些蠕虫通常是唯一存在的化学共生分类单元(它们在躯干区域的滋养体器官内宿主化学合成细菌),因此高纬度渗透生态学研究的一个关键问题是它们是否含有甲烷共生生物。由于蚯蚓的稳定碳同位素特征(低于-50‰,通常表明甲烷共生)与缺乏甲烷共生的分子或微观证据之间的不匹配,这种争论得以体现。有两种假说可以解释这一悖论:(1)从渗漏环境中吸收δC13值耗尽的沉积物碳化合物;(2)甲烷营养共生菌数量少,但意义重大,且难以检测。本研究对来自4个不同高纬度地区的2种北方疏尾蕨(Oligobrachia webbi和Oligobrachia sp. cl -clade)的V3-V4区进行了16S rRNA扩增子测序,以验证后一种假说。我们还通过透射电子显微镜目视检查了蠕虫共生寄主器官——滋养体内的共生细菌。结果:获得的绝大多数reads对应于硫化物氧化剂,只有非常小比例的reads对应于甲烷氧化剂,这表明缺乏甲烷营养共生体。从不同的蠕虫中恢复了许多硫氧化细菌菌株,然而,宿主个体往往具有单一菌株,有时具有两个密切相关的菌株。然而,菌株与我们所调查的两种寡臂亚种中的任何一种都没有特异性对应。水深可以在确定当地沉积物细菌群落方面发挥作用,这些细菌群落是蠕虫机会性地吸收的。细菌在非滋养体(因此无共生体)组织中丰富,可能是表观细菌或管状细菌群落。结论:北极和北大西洋低尾藻滋养体中缺少甲烷营养细菌序列可能表明这些蠕虫体内缺乏甲烷营养共生体,这表明营养是以硫为基础的。这反过来意味着沉积物碳吸收是这些动物δ13C值低的原因。此外,内共生伙伴可能是局部确定的,并且可能只代表从这些(和其他)种的组织中获得的所有细菌序列的一小部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Diet affects reproductive development and microbiota composition in honey bees. The role of gut microbiota in a generalist, golden snub-nosed monkey, adaptation to geographical diet change. Insights into the occurrence of phylosymbiosis and co-phylogeny in the holobionts of octocorals from the Mediterranean Sea and Red Sea. Programming rumen microbiome development in calves with the anti-methanogenic compound 3-NOP. Ruminant microbiome data are skewed and unFAIR, undermining their usefulness for sustainable production improvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1