Identification of SARS-CoV-2 biomarkers in saliva by transcriptomic and proteomics analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Clinical proteomics Pub Date : 2023-08-03 DOI:10.1186/s12014-023-09417-w
Lina M Marin, George S Katselis, Paulos Chumala, Stephen Sanche, Lucas Julseth, Erika Penz, Robert Skomro, Walter L Siqueira
{"title":"Identification of SARS-CoV-2 biomarkers in saliva by transcriptomic and proteomics analysis.","authors":"Lina M Marin, George S Katselis, Paulos Chumala, Stephen Sanche, Lucas Julseth, Erika Penz, Robert Skomro, Walter L Siqueira","doi":"10.1186/s12014-023-09417-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The detection of SARS-CoV-2 biomarkers by real time PCR (rRT-PCR) has shown that the sensitivity of the test is negatively affected by low viral loads and the severity of the disease. This limitation can be overcome by the use of more sensitive approaches such as mass spectrometry (MS), which has not been explored for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 proteins in saliva. Thus, this study aimed at assessing the translational applicability of mass spectrometry-based proteomics approaches to identify viral proteins in saliva from people diagnosed with COVID-19 within fourteen days after the initial diagnosis, and to compare its performance with rRT-PCR. After ethics approval, saliva samples were self-collected by 42 COVID-19 positive and 16 healthy individuals. Samples from people positive for COVID-19 were collected on average on the sixth day (± 4 days) after initial diagnosis. Viable viral particles in saliva were heat-inactivated followed by the extraction of total proteins and viral RNA. Proteins were digested and then subjected to tandem MS analysis (LC-QTOF-MS/MS) using a data-dependent MS/MS acquisition qualitative shotgun proteomics approach. The acquired spectra were queried against a combined SARS-CoV-2 and human database. The qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 specific RNA was done by rRT-PCR. SARS-CoV-2 proteins were identified in all COVID-19 samples (100%), while viral RNA was detected in only 24 out of 42 COVID-19 samples (57.1%). Seven out of 18 SARS-CoV-2 proteins were identified in saliva from COVID-19 positive individuals, from which the most frequent were replicase polyproteins 1ab (100%) and 1a (91.3%), and nucleocapsid (45.2%). Neither viral proteins nor RNA were detected in healthy individuals. Our mass spectrometry approach appears to be more sensitive than rRT-PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 biomarkers in saliva collected from COVID-19 positive individuals up to 14 days after the initial diagnostic test. Based on the novel data presented here, our MS technology can be used as an effective diagnostic test of COVID-19 for initial diagnosis or follow-up of symptomatic cases, especially in patients with reduced viral load.</p>","PeriodicalId":10468,"journal":{"name":"Clinical proteomics","volume":"20 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10398966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-023-09417-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The detection of SARS-CoV-2 biomarkers by real time PCR (rRT-PCR) has shown that the sensitivity of the test is negatively affected by low viral loads and the severity of the disease. This limitation can be overcome by the use of more sensitive approaches such as mass spectrometry (MS), which has not been explored for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 proteins in saliva. Thus, this study aimed at assessing the translational applicability of mass spectrometry-based proteomics approaches to identify viral proteins in saliva from people diagnosed with COVID-19 within fourteen days after the initial diagnosis, and to compare its performance with rRT-PCR. After ethics approval, saliva samples were self-collected by 42 COVID-19 positive and 16 healthy individuals. Samples from people positive for COVID-19 were collected on average on the sixth day (± 4 days) after initial diagnosis. Viable viral particles in saliva were heat-inactivated followed by the extraction of total proteins and viral RNA. Proteins were digested and then subjected to tandem MS analysis (LC-QTOF-MS/MS) using a data-dependent MS/MS acquisition qualitative shotgun proteomics approach. The acquired spectra were queried against a combined SARS-CoV-2 and human database. The qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 specific RNA was done by rRT-PCR. SARS-CoV-2 proteins were identified in all COVID-19 samples (100%), while viral RNA was detected in only 24 out of 42 COVID-19 samples (57.1%). Seven out of 18 SARS-CoV-2 proteins were identified in saliva from COVID-19 positive individuals, from which the most frequent were replicase polyproteins 1ab (100%) and 1a (91.3%), and nucleocapsid (45.2%). Neither viral proteins nor RNA were detected in healthy individuals. Our mass spectrometry approach appears to be more sensitive than rRT-PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 biomarkers in saliva collected from COVID-19 positive individuals up to 14 days after the initial diagnostic test. Based on the novel data presented here, our MS technology can be used as an effective diagnostic test of COVID-19 for initial diagnosis or follow-up of symptomatic cases, especially in patients with reduced viral load.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
唾液中SARS-CoV-2生物标志物的转录组学和蛋白质组学分析
实时PCR (rRT-PCR)检测SARS-CoV-2生物标志物表明,该检测的敏感性受到低病毒载量和疾病严重程度的负面影响。这一限制可以通过使用更灵敏的方法来克服,例如质谱法(MS),但尚未探索用于检测唾液中的SARS-CoV-2蛋白。因此,本研究旨在评估基于质谱的蛋白质组学方法在初步诊断后14天内鉴定COVID-19患者唾液中的病毒蛋白的翻译适用性,并将其性能与rRT-PCR进行比较。经伦理审批后,42名COVID-19阳性个体和16名健康个体自行采集唾液样本。平均在初次诊断后第6天(±4天)采集COVID-19阳性人群的样本。热灭活唾液中的活病毒颗粒,提取总蛋白和病毒RNA。蛋白质被消化,然后进行串联质谱分析(LC-QTOF-MS/MS),使用数据依赖的MS/MS获取定性霰弹枪蛋白质组学方法。采集的光谱在SARS-CoV-2和人类数据库中进行查询。采用rRT-PCR法定性检测SARS-CoV-2特异性RNA。在所有COVID-19样本中均检测到SARS-CoV-2蛋白(100%),而在42份COVID-19样本中仅检测到病毒RNA(57.1%)。在COVID-19阳性个体的唾液中鉴定出18种SARS-CoV-2蛋白中的7种,其中最常见的是复制酶多蛋白1ab(100%)和1a(91.3%),以及核衣壳(45.2%)。在健康个体中未检测到病毒蛋白和RNA。在首次诊断测试后14天内,我们的质谱分析方法似乎比rRT-PCR更敏感地检测COVID-19阳性个体唾液中的SARS-CoV-2生物标志物。基于本文提供的新数据,我们的MS技术可作为COVID-19的有效诊断测试,用于有症状病例的初始诊断或随访,特别是在病毒载量降低的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical proteomics
Clinical proteomics BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
37
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Proteomics encompasses all aspects of translational proteomics. Special emphasis will be placed on the application of proteomic technology to all aspects of clinical research and molecular medicine. The journal is committed to rapid scientific review and timely publication of submitted manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
Integrating functional proteomics and next generation sequencing reveals potential therapeutic targets for Taiwanese breast cancer. ARTN and CCL23 predicted chemosensitivity in acute myeloid leukemia: an Olink® proteomics approach. Medwakh smoking induces alterations in salivary proteins and cytokine expression: a clinical exploratory proteomics investigation. Cord blood platelet-rich plasma: proteomics analysis for ophthalmic applications. Quantitative site-specific N-glycosylation analysis reveals IgG glyco-signatures for pancreatic cancer diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1