Authors' reply, re: A response to Zhou et al. regarding thiamine supplementation in altered mental status.

Daniel J Zhou, Sachin Kedar
{"title":"Authors' reply, re: A response to Zhou et al. regarding thiamine supplementation in altered mental status.","authors":"Daniel J Zhou, Sachin Kedar","doi":"10.1080/21548331.2023.2170154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We thank Drs. Trebach and Hoffman for their thoughtful remarks and use this opportunity to discuss their concerns. We acknowledge the limitations of a single institution-based, retrospective, cohort study and have addressed these in our manuscript extensively [1]. In this practice-based, real-world study, we examined hospital outcomes and thiamine prescription patterns among a diverse group of hospital-based providers who were licensed and credentialed to manage patients with altered mental status from all-causes, including those with hypoglycemia. While we found wide variations in the thiamine prescription patterns (timing, dosage, and route of administration), we are not unique in reporting such variations in clinical practice [2– 6]. It is possible that differences in prescription patterns such as glucose-first vs. thiamine-first or parenteral vs. enteral vs. no thiamine could be the result of disease severity. While we controlled for disease severity using Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group (MS-DRG) weight in our models, it is possible that this measure may not have captured the breadth of clinical severity. Additional analyses of the effects of different dosages on outcomes were not feasible due to wide variations in clinical practice resulting in small patient numbers in groups. We acknowledge the growing evidence for the lack of benefit of supplemental thiamine in critically ill patients [7,8]. It has also been reported that glucose administration before or without thiamine would not acutely worsen the effects of thiamine deficiency unless the glucose administration is prolonged [9]. However, in our study, we found that patients who received glucose before or without thiamine had increased inhospital mortality rate after controlling for disease severity. Based on the results of our study, we cannot in good conscience, argue against the current medical practice (dogma) of administering parenteral thiamine before glucose for critically ill patients with altered mental status from all causes.","PeriodicalId":35045,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice (1995)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice (1995)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2023.2170154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We thank Drs. Trebach and Hoffman for their thoughtful remarks and use this opportunity to discuss their concerns. We acknowledge the limitations of a single institution-based, retrospective, cohort study and have addressed these in our manuscript extensively [1]. In this practice-based, real-world study, we examined hospital outcomes and thiamine prescription patterns among a diverse group of hospital-based providers who were licensed and credentialed to manage patients with altered mental status from all-causes, including those with hypoglycemia. While we found wide variations in the thiamine prescription patterns (timing, dosage, and route of administration), we are not unique in reporting such variations in clinical practice [2– 6]. It is possible that differences in prescription patterns such as glucose-first vs. thiamine-first or parenteral vs. enteral vs. no thiamine could be the result of disease severity. While we controlled for disease severity using Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group (MS-DRG) weight in our models, it is possible that this measure may not have captured the breadth of clinical severity. Additional analyses of the effects of different dosages on outcomes were not feasible due to wide variations in clinical practice resulting in small patient numbers in groups. We acknowledge the growing evidence for the lack of benefit of supplemental thiamine in critically ill patients [7,8]. It has also been reported that glucose administration before or without thiamine would not acutely worsen the effects of thiamine deficiency unless the glucose administration is prolonged [9]. However, in our study, we found that patients who received glucose before or without thiamine had increased inhospital mortality rate after controlling for disease severity. Based on the results of our study, we cannot in good conscience, argue against the current medical practice (dogma) of administering parenteral thiamine before glucose for critically ill patients with altered mental status from all causes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作者回复:对Zhou等人关于补充硫胺素对改变精神状态的影响的回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital practice (1995)
Hospital practice (1995) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
An insight into the updated pharmacotherapy of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) in lean individuals: a review. Chest tube size selection for pleural effusion: from the perspective of thoracic surgeons and pulmonologists. Prescription for crisis: the compounding effect of community drug shortages on Lebanon's healthcare system. Outcomes and complications of heart failure with iron deficiency anemia: a nationwide analysis. Benign acute myositis in an adult: case-based review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1