OSNA Total Tumor Load for the Prediction of Axillary Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients: Should We use Different Thresholds According to the Intrinsic Molecular Subtype? MOTTO Study.

IF 1.9 Q3 PATHOLOGY Clinical Pathology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2632010X231183693
L Bernet, D Hardisson, M Rodrigo, A Córdoba, M Sancho, V Peg, I Ruiz, F Godey, J I Sánchez-Méndez, A Prat
{"title":"OSNA Total Tumor Load for the Prediction of Axillary Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients: Should We use Different Thresholds According to the Intrinsic Molecular Subtype? MOTTO Study.","authors":"L Bernet,&nbsp;D Hardisson,&nbsp;M Rodrigo,&nbsp;A Córdoba,&nbsp;M Sancho,&nbsp;V Peg,&nbsp;I Ruiz,&nbsp;F Godey,&nbsp;J I Sánchez-Méndez,&nbsp;A Prat","doi":"10.1177/2632010X231183693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the impact of the molecular subtype (MS) on the total number of CK19 mRNA copies in all positive SLN (TTL) threshold, to predict non-SLN affectation, and to compare 5 years progression-free survival (PFS) according to the risk of recurrence (ROR) group by PAM50.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cohort with infiltrating breast cancer with intra-operative metastatic SLN detected by one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay who underwent subsequent ALND. Logistic regression was used to assess a possible interaction between TTL and MS(Triple Negative, Her-2-Enriched, Luminal A, or Luminal B), or hormone receptors (HR: positive or negative) by immunohistochemistry (IMH). Cox regression was used to compare PFS and OS in the 3 ROR groups (high, medium, or low).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TTL was predictive of non-SLN affectation in both univariate (OR [95% CI]: 1.72 [1.43, 2.05], <i>P</i> < .001) and multivariate (1.55 [95% CI: 1.04, 2.32], <i>P</i> = .030) models, but MS-IMH or HR-IMH, and their interactions with TTL were not (best multivariate model: HR + main effect OR 1.16 [95% CI: 0.18, 7.64], <i>P</i> = .874; interaction OR: 1.04 [0.7, 1.55], <i>P</i> = .835; univariate model: HR + main effect OR: 1.44 [95% CI: 0.85, 2.44], <i>P</i> = .180). PFS was lower in the high-risk ROR group (81.1%) than in the low-risk group (93.9%) (HR: 3.68 [95 CI: 1.70, 7.94], <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>our results do not provide evidence to support the utilization of subtype-specific thresholds for TTL values to make therapeutic decisions on the axilla. The ROR group was predictive of 5 years-PFS.</p>","PeriodicalId":53204,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/35/74/10.1177_2632010X231183693.PMC10392164.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2632010X231183693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To assess the impact of the molecular subtype (MS) on the total number of CK19 mRNA copies in all positive SLN (TTL) threshold, to predict non-SLN affectation, and to compare 5 years progression-free survival (PFS) according to the risk of recurrence (ROR) group by PAM50.

Methods: Cohort with infiltrating breast cancer with intra-operative metastatic SLN detected by one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay who underwent subsequent ALND. Logistic regression was used to assess a possible interaction between TTL and MS(Triple Negative, Her-2-Enriched, Luminal A, or Luminal B), or hormone receptors (HR: positive or negative) by immunohistochemistry (IMH). Cox regression was used to compare PFS and OS in the 3 ROR groups (high, medium, or low).

Results: TTL was predictive of non-SLN affectation in both univariate (OR [95% CI]: 1.72 [1.43, 2.05], P < .001) and multivariate (1.55 [95% CI: 1.04, 2.32], P = .030) models, but MS-IMH or HR-IMH, and their interactions with TTL were not (best multivariate model: HR + main effect OR 1.16 [95% CI: 0.18, 7.64], P = .874; interaction OR: 1.04 [0.7, 1.55], P = .835; univariate model: HR + main effect OR: 1.44 [95% CI: 0.85, 2.44], P = .180). PFS was lower in the high-risk ROR group (81.1%) than in the low-risk group (93.9%) (HR: 3.68 [95 CI: 1.70, 7.94], P < .001).

Conclusions: our results do not provide evidence to support the utilization of subtype-specific thresholds for TTL values to make therapeutic decisions on the axilla. The ROR group was predictive of 5 years-PFS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
OSNA总肿瘤负荷预测乳腺癌患者腋窝受累:我们是否应该根据内在分子亚型使用不同的阈值?的座右铭。
目的:评估分子亚型(MS)对所有SLN阳性(TTL)阈值中CK19 mRNA拷贝总数的影响,预测非SLN影响,并通过PAM50比较根据复发风险(ROR)组的5年无进展生存期(PFS)。方法:采用一步核酸扩增(OSNA)法检测术中转移性SLN的浸润性乳腺癌患者,并对其进行ALND治疗。通过免疫组织化学(IMH),采用Logistic回归评估TTL与MS(三阴性、her -2富集、Luminal a或Luminal B)或激素受体(HR:阳性或阴性)之间可能的相互作用。采用Cox回归比较3个ROR组(高、中、低)的PFS和OS。结果:在两种单因素模型中,TTL均可预测非sln影响(OR [95% CI]: 1.72 [1.43, 2.05], P = 0.030),但MS-IMH或HR- imh及其与TTL的相互作用不能预测(最佳多因素模型:HR +主效应OR 1.16 [95% CI: 0.18, 7.64], P = 0.874;交互作用OR: 1.04 [0.7, 1.55], P = .835;单因素模型:HR +主效应OR: 1.44 [95% CI: 0.85, 2.44], P = 0.180)。高风险ROR组的PFS(81.1%)低于低风险组(93.9%)(HR: 3.68 [95 CI: 1.70, 7.94], P结论:我们的研究结果没有提供证据支持使用亚型特异性阈值作为TTL值来制定腋窝的治疗决策。ROR组可预测5年pfs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Pathology
Clinical Pathology PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
66
期刊最新文献
Poroid Neoplasms: A Clinicopathological Study of 13 Cases. A Case of Cotyledonoid-Dissecting Leiomyoma - The Utility of Laparoscopic Biopsy and Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogs. Diagnosing B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in 2 pediatric patients with recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Primary Breast Lymphoma: A Case Report of a Common Tumor in an Uncommon Location. Clinical and Pathological Features of the Nested Subtype of Urothelial Carcinoma With Lymph Node Metastasis as the Initial Presentation: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1