Racial and ethnic disparities in cervical and breast cancer screenings by nativity and length of U.S. residence.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES Ethnicity & Health Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1080/13557858.2023.2174254
Quynh Nhu Natasha B La Frinere-Sandoval, Catherine Cubbin, Diana M DiNitto
{"title":"Racial and ethnic disparities in cervical and breast cancer screenings by nativity and length of U.S. residence.","authors":"Quynh Nhu Natasha B La Frinere-Sandoval,&nbsp;Catherine Cubbin,&nbsp;Diana M DiNitto","doi":"10.1080/13557858.2023.2174254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Previous studies of disparities in breast and cervical cancer screenings have focused on broad racial/ethnic groups or nativity status without accounting for immigration histories. Recent theoretical work argues for using intersectional approaches and examining within-group inequalities. Utilizing multiple years of National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data, we examined between- and within-group Papanicolaou (Pap) test and mammogram screening based on nativity and length of U.S. residence for Asian and Hispanic women, along with non-Hispanic Black and White women.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study samples consist of 54,900 women ages 21-64 without a hysterectomy who responded to questions about Pap test screening and 36,300 women ages 40-64 who responded to questions about mammogram screening. Asian and Hispanic women were further stratified by nativity and, for immigrants, length of time in the United States. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant associations with Pap test and mammogram screenings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recent Asian and Hispanic immigrants had the lowest Pap test and mammogram rates among all other groups, while Black (and White women for mammograms) women had the highest rates. After accounting for age, marital status, health insurance, education, employment status, and income, both Asian groups had lower odds, and Black and all Hispanic groups had higher odds of Pap test screening compared with White women. Similar results were observed for mammogram screening, except that long-term immigrant/U.S.-born Asian and U.S.-born Hispanic women did not have significantly different odds compared with White women. In general, the strength and direction of most sociodemographic variables were similar across groups for Pap test screening but differed for mammogram screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The between-group differences identified emphasize the disparities in screening between racial/ethnic groups while the within-group differences suggest the need to examine whether more targeted outreach efforts and prevention messages can increase screening for specific groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":51038,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Health","volume":"28 6","pages":"895-911"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2023.2174254","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: Previous studies of disparities in breast and cervical cancer screenings have focused on broad racial/ethnic groups or nativity status without accounting for immigration histories. Recent theoretical work argues for using intersectional approaches and examining within-group inequalities. Utilizing multiple years of National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data, we examined between- and within-group Papanicolaou (Pap) test and mammogram screening based on nativity and length of U.S. residence for Asian and Hispanic women, along with non-Hispanic Black and White women.

Design: The study samples consist of 54,900 women ages 21-64 without a hysterectomy who responded to questions about Pap test screening and 36,300 women ages 40-64 who responded to questions about mammogram screening. Asian and Hispanic women were further stratified by nativity and, for immigrants, length of time in the United States. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant associations with Pap test and mammogram screenings.

Results: Recent Asian and Hispanic immigrants had the lowest Pap test and mammogram rates among all other groups, while Black (and White women for mammograms) women had the highest rates. After accounting for age, marital status, health insurance, education, employment status, and income, both Asian groups had lower odds, and Black and all Hispanic groups had higher odds of Pap test screening compared with White women. Similar results were observed for mammogram screening, except that long-term immigrant/U.S.-born Asian and U.S.-born Hispanic women did not have significantly different odds compared with White women. In general, the strength and direction of most sociodemographic variables were similar across groups for Pap test screening but differed for mammogram screening.

Conclusions: The between-group differences identified emphasize the disparities in screening between racial/ethnic groups while the within-group differences suggest the need to examine whether more targeted outreach efforts and prevention messages can increase screening for specific groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子宫颈癌和乳腺癌筛查的种族和民族差异按出生和在美国居住的时间长短。
目的:以往对乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查差异的研究侧重于广泛的种族/民族群体或出生状况,而没有考虑移民史。最近的理论工作主张使用交叉方法并检查群体内的不平等。利用多年的全国健康访谈调查(NHIS)数据,我们根据亚裔和西班牙裔女性以及非西班牙裔黑人和白人女性的出生和在美国居住的时间长短,检查了组内和组间巴氏涂片(Pap)检查和乳房x光检查。设计:研究样本包括54,900名21-64岁未切除子宫的女性,她们回答了关于巴氏试验筛查的问题,以及36,300名40-64岁的女性回答了关于乳房x光检查的问题。亚裔和西班牙裔女性因出生和移民在美国的时间长短而进一步分层。Logistic回归分析用于确定与巴氏涂片检查和乳房x光检查的显著相关性。结果:最近的亚洲和西班牙裔移民在所有其他群体中有最低的巴氏涂片检查和乳房x光检查率,而黑人(和白人妇女进行乳房x光检查)妇女的比率最高。在考虑了年龄、婚姻状况、健康保险、教育、就业状况和收入等因素后,与白人女性相比,亚裔女性的巴氏试验筛查率较低,而黑人和所有西班牙裔女性的巴氏试验筛查率较高。在乳房x光检查中也观察到类似的结果,除了长期移民/美国在美国出生的亚洲女性和在美国出生的西班牙裔女性与白人女性相比,患病几率没有显著差异。总的来说,大多数社会人口学变量的强度和方向在巴氏涂片筛查组中相似,但在乳房x光检查组中不同。结论:发现的组间差异强调了种族/民族之间筛查的差异,而组内差异表明需要检查更有针对性的外展工作和预防信息是否可以增加对特定群体的筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnicity & Health
Ethnicity & Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethnicity & Health is an international academic journal designed to meet the world-wide interest in the health of ethnic groups. It embraces original papers from the full range of disciplines concerned with investigating the relationship between ’ethnicity’ and ’health’ (including medicine and nursing, public health, epidemiology, social sciences, population sciences, and statistics). The journal also covers issues of culture, religion, gender, class, migration, lifestyle and racism, in so far as they relate to health and its anthropological and social aspects.
期刊最新文献
'COVID impacted my life in so many ways': a qualitative study of the lived experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic among people of Black ethnicities living with HIV in England. A paradox of white privilege: race, psychological resilience, and mental well-being during a public health crisis. 'I didn't expect to be so close to being diabetic': beliefs of prediabetes and diabetes prevention among Hispanic men at a federally qualified health center. Psychological distress in Asian American informal caregivers: an analysis by disaggregated ethnic groups. Racial diversity, interracial trust, and mental distress in post-apartheid South Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1