Eun Jeong Choi, Sam Ryong Jee, Sang Heon Lee, Jun Sik Yoon, Seung Jung Yu, Jong Hyun Lee, Han Byul Lee, Sang Wook Yi, Myeong Pyo Kim, Byung Cheol Chung, Hong Sub Lee
{"title":"Effect of music on colonoscopy performance: A propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Eun Jeong Choi, Sam Ryong Jee, Sang Heon Lee, Jun Sik Yoon, Seung Jung Yu, Jong Hyun Lee, Han Byul Lee, Sang Wook Yi, Myeong Pyo Kim, Byung Cheol Chung, Hong Sub Lee","doi":"10.4253/wjge.v15.i5.397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Music has been used to reduce stress and improve task performance during medical therapy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the effects of music on colonoscopy performance outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent colonoscopy performed by four endoscopists with popular music. Colonoscopy performance outcomes, such as insertion time, adenoma detection rate (ADR), and polyp detection rate (PDR), were compared between the music and non-music groups. To reduce selection bias, propensity score matching was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After one-to-one propensity score matching, 169 colonoscopies were selected from each group. No significant differences in insertion time (4.97 <i>vs</i> 5.17 min, <i>P</i> = 0.795) and ADR (39.1% <i>vs</i> 46.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.226) were found between the two groups. Subgroup analysis showed that the insertion time (3.6 <i>vs</i> 3.8 min, <i>P</i> = 0.852) and ADR (51.1% <i>vs</i> 44.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.488) did not significantly differ between the two groups in experts. However, in trainees, PDR (46.9% <i>vs</i> 66.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.016) and ADR (25.9% <i>vs</i> 47.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.006) were significantly lower in the music than in the non-music group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study found that listening to music during colonoscopy did not affect procedure performance. Moreover, it suggested that music may distract trainees from appropriately detecting adenomas and polyps.</p>","PeriodicalId":23953,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"15 5","pages":"397-406"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cb/a1/WJGE-15-397.PMC10236976.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v15.i5.397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Music has been used to reduce stress and improve task performance during medical therapy.
Aim: To assess the effects of music on colonoscopy performance outcomes.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent colonoscopy performed by four endoscopists with popular music. Colonoscopy performance outcomes, such as insertion time, adenoma detection rate (ADR), and polyp detection rate (PDR), were compared between the music and non-music groups. To reduce selection bias, propensity score matching was used.
Results: After one-to-one propensity score matching, 169 colonoscopies were selected from each group. No significant differences in insertion time (4.97 vs 5.17 min, P = 0.795) and ADR (39.1% vs 46.2%, P = 0.226) were found between the two groups. Subgroup analysis showed that the insertion time (3.6 vs 3.8 min, P = 0.852) and ADR (51.1% vs 44.7%, P = 0.488) did not significantly differ between the two groups in experts. However, in trainees, PDR (46.9% vs 66.7%, P = 0.016) and ADR (25.9% vs 47.6%, P = 0.006) were significantly lower in the music than in the non-music group.
Conclusion: The current study found that listening to music during colonoscopy did not affect procedure performance. Moreover, it suggested that music may distract trainees from appropriately detecting adenomas and polyps.
背景:在医学治疗过程中,音乐被用来减轻压力和改善任务表现。目的:评价音乐对结肠镜检查结果的影响。方法:我们回顾性回顾了四名内镜医师在流行音乐的伴奏下进行结肠镜检查的患者。比较音乐组和非音乐组结肠镜检查结果,如插入时间、腺瘤检出率(ADR)和息肉检出率(PDR)。为减少选择偏差,采用倾向评分匹配。结果:经过一对一倾向评分匹配,每组选择169例结肠镜检查。两组插入时间(4.97 vs 5.17 min, P = 0.795)和不良反应(39.1% vs 46.2%, P = 0.226)差异无统计学意义。亚组分析显示,两组专家的插入时间(3.6 vs 3.8 min, P = 0.852)和不良反应(51.1% vs 44.7%, P = 0.488)无显著差异。然而,在受训人员中,音乐组的PDR (46.9% vs 66.7%, P = 0.016)和ADR (25.9% vs 47.6%, P = 0.006)显著低于非音乐组。结论:目前的研究发现,在结肠镜检查期间听音乐并不影响手术的表现。此外,它还表明音乐可能会分散受训者对腺瘤和息肉的适当检测。