Effect of music on colonoscopy performance: A propensity score-matched analysis.

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2023-05-16 DOI:10.4253/wjge.v15.i5.397
Eun Jeong Choi, Sam Ryong Jee, Sang Heon Lee, Jun Sik Yoon, Seung Jung Yu, Jong Hyun Lee, Han Byul Lee, Sang Wook Yi, Myeong Pyo Kim, Byung Cheol Chung, Hong Sub Lee
{"title":"Effect of music on colonoscopy performance: A propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Eun Jeong Choi,&nbsp;Sam Ryong Jee,&nbsp;Sang Heon Lee,&nbsp;Jun Sik Yoon,&nbsp;Seung Jung Yu,&nbsp;Jong Hyun Lee,&nbsp;Han Byul Lee,&nbsp;Sang Wook Yi,&nbsp;Myeong Pyo Kim,&nbsp;Byung Cheol Chung,&nbsp;Hong Sub Lee","doi":"10.4253/wjge.v15.i5.397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Music has been used to reduce stress and improve task performance during medical therapy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the effects of music on colonoscopy performance outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent colonoscopy performed by four endoscopists with popular music. Colonoscopy performance outcomes, such as insertion time, adenoma detection rate (ADR), and polyp detection rate (PDR), were compared between the music and non-music groups. To reduce selection bias, propensity score matching was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After one-to-one propensity score matching, 169 colonoscopies were selected from each group. No significant differences in insertion time (4.97 <i>vs</i> 5.17 min, <i>P</i> = 0.795) and ADR (39.1% <i>vs</i> 46.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.226) were found between the two groups. Subgroup analysis showed that the insertion time (3.6 <i>vs</i> 3.8 min, <i>P</i> = 0.852) and ADR (51.1% <i>vs</i> 44.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.488) did not significantly differ between the two groups in experts. However, in trainees, PDR (46.9% <i>vs</i> 66.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.016) and ADR (25.9% <i>vs</i> 47.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.006) were significantly lower in the music than in the non-music group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study found that listening to music during colonoscopy did not affect procedure performance. Moreover, it suggested that music may distract trainees from appropriately detecting adenomas and polyps.</p>","PeriodicalId":23953,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"15 5","pages":"397-406"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cb/a1/WJGE-15-397.PMC10236976.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v15.i5.397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Music has been used to reduce stress and improve task performance during medical therapy.

Aim: To assess the effects of music on colonoscopy performance outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent colonoscopy performed by four endoscopists with popular music. Colonoscopy performance outcomes, such as insertion time, adenoma detection rate (ADR), and polyp detection rate (PDR), were compared between the music and non-music groups. To reduce selection bias, propensity score matching was used.

Results: After one-to-one propensity score matching, 169 colonoscopies were selected from each group. No significant differences in insertion time (4.97 vs 5.17 min, P = 0.795) and ADR (39.1% vs 46.2%, P = 0.226) were found between the two groups. Subgroup analysis showed that the insertion time (3.6 vs 3.8 min, P = 0.852) and ADR (51.1% vs 44.7%, P = 0.488) did not significantly differ between the two groups in experts. However, in trainees, PDR (46.9% vs 66.7%, P = 0.016) and ADR (25.9% vs 47.6%, P = 0.006) were significantly lower in the music than in the non-music group.

Conclusion: The current study found that listening to music during colonoscopy did not affect procedure performance. Moreover, it suggested that music may distract trainees from appropriately detecting adenomas and polyps.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
音乐对结肠镜检查表现的影响:倾向评分匹配分析。
背景:在医学治疗过程中,音乐被用来减轻压力和改善任务表现。目的:评价音乐对结肠镜检查结果的影响。方法:我们回顾性回顾了四名内镜医师在流行音乐的伴奏下进行结肠镜检查的患者。比较音乐组和非音乐组结肠镜检查结果,如插入时间、腺瘤检出率(ADR)和息肉检出率(PDR)。为减少选择偏差,采用倾向评分匹配。结果:经过一对一倾向评分匹配,每组选择169例结肠镜检查。两组插入时间(4.97 vs 5.17 min, P = 0.795)和不良反应(39.1% vs 46.2%, P = 0.226)差异无统计学意义。亚组分析显示,两组专家的插入时间(3.6 vs 3.8 min, P = 0.852)和不良反应(51.1% vs 44.7%, P = 0.488)无显著差异。然而,在受训人员中,音乐组的PDR (46.9% vs 66.7%, P = 0.016)和ADR (25.9% vs 47.6%, P = 0.006)显著低于非音乐组。结论:目前的研究发现,在结肠镜检查期间听音乐并不影响手术的表现。此外,它还表明音乐可能会分散受训者对腺瘤和息肉的适当检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
5.00%
发文量
1164
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for patients aged ninety and older with choledocholithiasis: A single-center experience in south China. Bibliometric analysis on the top one hundred cited studies on gastrointestinal endoscopy. Cholecystogastric fistula presenting as pyloric obstruction - a Bouveret's syndrome: A case report. Complete resection of recurrent anal canal cancer using endoscopic submucosal dissection and transanal resection: A case report. Early esophageal cancer with mucosal bridging in the resting room: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1