The prevalence of seat belt use among drivers and passengers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shiva Kargar, Alireza Ansari-Moghaddam, Hossein Ansari
{"title":"The prevalence of seat belt use among drivers and passengers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Shiva Kargar, Alireza Ansari-Moghaddam, Hossein Ansari","doi":"10.1186/s42506-023-00139-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Seat belts might save people's lives in car accidents by preventing severe collision damage and keeping passengers safe from critical injuries. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the prevalence of seat belt use among drivers and passengers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The databases of PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), and Google Scholar were searched from the beginning of 2000 to late December 2020 to identify studies that investigated the prevalence of seat belt use among drivers and passengers. The pooled prevalence was calculated using a random-effects model. The STATA-v14 software was used to perform data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight studies that met the inclusion criteria and were suitable for this meta-analysis were identified. The pooled prevalence of seat belt use was 43.94% (95% CI: 42.23-45.73) among drivers, 38.47% (95% CI: 34.89-42.42) among front-seat passengers, and 15.32% (95% CI: 12.33-19.03) among rear-seat passengers. The lowest seat belt use among drivers and passengers was observed in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa, while the highest use was reported in Europe and America. Moreover, the prevalence of seat belt use was higher among women drivers [51.47% (95% CI: 48.62-54.48)] than men drivers [38.27% (95% CI: 34.98-41.87)] (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the highest prevalence of seat belt use was seen among drivers (68.9%) and front-seat passengers (50.5%) of sports utility vehicles (SUVs); in contrast, the lowest prevalence was observed among drivers and passengers of public vehicles such as buses, minibuses, and taxis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In general, the prevalence of seat belt use was not high among drivers and was even lower among passengers. Moreover, drivers and passengers in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa had the lowest prevalence of seat belt usage. Additionally, drivers and passengers of public transportation (buses, minibuses, and taxis) had a lower rate of seat belt use, especially among men. Therefore, effective interventional programs to improve seat belt use should be designed and implemented, particularly among these at-risk populations in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":22819,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association","volume":"98 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10393920/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42506-023-00139-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Seat belts might save people's lives in car accidents by preventing severe collision damage and keeping passengers safe from critical injuries. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the prevalence of seat belt use among drivers and passengers.

Methods: The databases of PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), and Google Scholar were searched from the beginning of 2000 to late December 2020 to identify studies that investigated the prevalence of seat belt use among drivers and passengers. The pooled prevalence was calculated using a random-effects model. The STATA-v14 software was used to perform data analysis.

Results: Sixty-eight studies that met the inclusion criteria and were suitable for this meta-analysis were identified. The pooled prevalence of seat belt use was 43.94% (95% CI: 42.23-45.73) among drivers, 38.47% (95% CI: 34.89-42.42) among front-seat passengers, and 15.32% (95% CI: 12.33-19.03) among rear-seat passengers. The lowest seat belt use among drivers and passengers was observed in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa, while the highest use was reported in Europe and America. Moreover, the prevalence of seat belt use was higher among women drivers [51.47% (95% CI: 48.62-54.48)] than men drivers [38.27% (95% CI: 34.98-41.87)] (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the highest prevalence of seat belt use was seen among drivers (68.9%) and front-seat passengers (50.5%) of sports utility vehicles (SUVs); in contrast, the lowest prevalence was observed among drivers and passengers of public vehicles such as buses, minibuses, and taxis.

Conclusions: In general, the prevalence of seat belt use was not high among drivers and was even lower among passengers. Moreover, drivers and passengers in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa had the lowest prevalence of seat belt usage. Additionally, drivers and passengers of public transportation (buses, minibuses, and taxis) had a lower rate of seat belt use, especially among men. Therefore, effective interventional programs to improve seat belt use should be designed and implemented, particularly among these at-risk populations in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
司机和乘客中安全带使用的普遍性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:安全带可以在汽车事故中挽救人们的生命,防止严重的碰撞损伤,使乘客免受严重伤害。本荟萃分析旨在评估驾驶员和乘客使用安全带的流行程度。方法:检索2000年初至2020年12月下旬的PubMed、Web of Science (WOS)和Google Scholar数据库,以确定调查驾驶员和乘客安全带使用情况的研究。合并患病率采用随机效应模型计算。采用STATA-v14软件进行数据分析。结果:确定了68项符合纳入标准并适合本荟萃分析的研究。驾驶员系安全带的总患病率为43.94% (95% CI: 42.23-45.73),前排乘客系安全带的总患病率为38.47% (95% CI: 34.89-42.42),后排乘客系安全带的总患病率为15.32% (95% CI: 12.33-19.03)。亚洲、中东和非洲的司机和乘客中安全带使用率最低,而欧洲和美洲的使用率最高。此外,女性驾驶员安全带使用率[51.47% (95% CI: 48.62 ~ 54.48)]高于男性驾驶员[38.27% (95% CI: 34.98 ~ 41.87)]。(P结论:总体而言,驾驶员安全带使用率不高,乘客安全带使用率更低。此外,亚洲、中东和非洲的司机和乘客使用安全带的比例最低。此外,公共交通工具(公共汽车、小巴和出租车)的司机和乘客使用安全带的比例较低,尤其是男性。因此,应设计和实施有效的干预方案,以改善安全带的使用,特别是在亚洲、中东和非洲的高危人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal accepts papers of original research which are not being considered for publication elsewhere and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge of Public Health at large
期刊最新文献
Metabolic syndrome prediction based on body composition indices. Pattern of antibiotic use among children caregivers: a cross-sectional study. Correction: Framework for developing cost-effectiveness analysis threshold: the case of Egypt. Psychological antecedents of vaccine inequity: keys to improve the rates of vaccination. Matters arising: On the cost-effectiveness for the Italian National Health Service of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone in metastatic pancreatic cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1