Anouk C de Jong, Marcel Segbers, Sui Wai Ling, Laura H Graven, Niven Mehra, Paul Hamberg, Tessa Brabander, Ronald de Wit, Astrid A M van der Veldt
{"title":"<sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT for Response Evaluation of <sup>223</sup>Ra Treatment in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Anouk C de Jong, Marcel Segbers, Sui Wai Ling, Laura H Graven, Niven Mehra, Paul Hamberg, Tessa Brabander, Ronald de Wit, Astrid A M van der Veldt","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.123.265489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CT and bone scintigraphy are not useful for response evaluation of bone metastases to <sup>223</sup>Ra treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). PET using <sup>68</sup>Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen 11 (<sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA) is a promising tool for response evaluation of mCRPC. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT for response evaluation of <sup>223</sup>Ra treatment in patients with mCRPC. <b>Methods:</b> Within this prospective, multicenter, imaging discovery study, 28 patients with mCRPC, eligible for <sup>223</sup>Ra treatment, were included between 2019 and 2022. Patients received <sup>223</sup>Ra according to the standard of care. Study procedures included CT, bone scintigraphy, and <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT at baseline, after 3 and 6 cycles of <sup>223</sup>Ra treatment, and on treatment failure. Response to <sup>223</sup>Ra treatment was visually assessed on all 3 imaging modalities. Total tumor volume within bone (TTV<sub>bone</sub>) was determined on <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Intrapatient heterogeneity in response was studied using a newly developed image-registration tool for sequential images of PET/CT. Results were compared with failure-free survival (good responders vs. poor responders; cutoff, 24 wk) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) response after 3 cycles. <b>Results:</b> Visual response assessment criteria could not distinguish good responders from poor responders on <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT and bone scintigraphy. For <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT, TTV<sub>bone</sub> at baseline was lower in good responders than in poor responders, whereas TTV<sub>bone</sub> increased in both groups during treatment. TTV<sub>bone</sub> was higher in patients with new extraosseous metastases during <sup>223</sup>Ra treatment. Although TTV<sub>bone</sub> and ALP correlated at baseline, changes in TTV<sub>bone</sub> and ALP on treatment did not. <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA response of TTV<sub>bone</sub> showed intrapatient heterogeneity in most patients. <b>Conclusion:</b> mCRPC patients with lower TTV<sub>bone</sub> on <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT have the best clinical outcome after <sup>223</sup>Ra treatment. Response is highly heterogeneous in most patients. A decrease in ALP, which occurred in most patients, was not correlated with a decrease in TTV<sub>bone</sub>, which might make one question the value of ALP for disease monitoring during <sup>223</sup>Ra treatment in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.265489","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
CT and bone scintigraphy are not useful for response evaluation of bone metastases to 223Ra treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). PET using 68Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen 11 (68Ga-PSMA) is a promising tool for response evaluation of mCRPC. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for response evaluation of 223Ra treatment in patients with mCRPC. Methods: Within this prospective, multicenter, imaging discovery study, 28 patients with mCRPC, eligible for 223Ra treatment, were included between 2019 and 2022. Patients received 223Ra according to the standard of care. Study procedures included CT, bone scintigraphy, and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT at baseline, after 3 and 6 cycles of 223Ra treatment, and on treatment failure. Response to 223Ra treatment was visually assessed on all 3 imaging modalities. Total tumor volume within bone (TTVbone) was determined on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Intrapatient heterogeneity in response was studied using a newly developed image-registration tool for sequential images of PET/CT. Results were compared with failure-free survival (good responders vs. poor responders; cutoff, 24 wk) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) response after 3 cycles. Results: Visual response assessment criteria could not distinguish good responders from poor responders on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and bone scintigraphy. For 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, TTVbone at baseline was lower in good responders than in poor responders, whereas TTVbone increased in both groups during treatment. TTVbone was higher in patients with new extraosseous metastases during 223Ra treatment. Although TTVbone and ALP correlated at baseline, changes in TTVbone and ALP on treatment did not. 68Ga-PSMA response of TTVbone showed intrapatient heterogeneity in most patients. Conclusion: mCRPC patients with lower TTVbone on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT have the best clinical outcome after 223Ra treatment. Response is highly heterogeneous in most patients. A decrease in ALP, which occurred in most patients, was not correlated with a decrease in TTVbone, which might make one question the value of ALP for disease monitoring during 223Ra treatment in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine (JNM), self-published by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), provides readers worldwide with clinical and basic science investigations, continuing education articles, reviews, employment opportunities, and updates on practice and research. In the 2022 Journal Citation Reports (released in June 2023), JNM ranked sixth in impact among 203 medical journals worldwide in the radiology, nuclear medicine, and medical imaging category.