Violence directed against teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A social-ecological analysis of safety and well-being.

School psychology (Washington, D.C.) Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-27 DOI:10.1037/spq0000562
Linda A Reddy, Andrew Martinez, Andrew H Perry, Susan D McMahon, Dorothy L Espelage, Eric M Anderman, Ron A Astor, Frank C Worrell
{"title":"Violence directed against teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A social-ecological analysis of safety and well-being.","authors":"Linda A Reddy, Andrew Martinez, Andrew H Perry, Susan D McMahon, Dorothy L Espelage, Eric M Anderman, Ron A Astor, Frank C Worrell","doi":"10.1037/spq0000562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Violence against teachers is a public health crisis that has devastating effects on school personnel well-being, health, and retention, as well as students' educational outcomes. In collaboration with national organizations, the American Psychological Association Task Force on Violence against Educators conducted the first national survey on educator victimization that included 4,136 pre-K through 12th-grade teachers from all 50 U.S. states and Puerto Rico during the pandemic. In the current study, 43.7% of teachers reported experiencing at least one verbal threat, physical assault, and/or property damage, with verbal threats being the most prevalent form of victimization during the pandemic. Using a social-ecological framework and logistic regression analyses, characteristics of teachers, school climate, and school organizational and community factors were examined as predictors of teacher victimization (i.e., verbal threats, physical, property violence) during the pandemic. Findings revealed that teacher role (i.e., special educators), negative and positive dimensions of school climate, as well as school organizational and community factors (i.e., percent of students receiving free and reduced lunch, instructional modality, school level, and urbanicity) significantly predicted greater teacher victimization. While findings revealed that in-person instruction significantly predicted teacher violence across aggressors, teacher victimization was reported across instructional modality (in-person, hybrid, remote). Results offer insights into possible contextual antecedents to teacher victimization, sense of safety, and well-being in schools. Implications for research and school practice are presented. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74763,"journal":{"name":"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)","volume":" ","pages":"510-519"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Violence against teachers is a public health crisis that has devastating effects on school personnel well-being, health, and retention, as well as students' educational outcomes. In collaboration with national organizations, the American Psychological Association Task Force on Violence against Educators conducted the first national survey on educator victimization that included 4,136 pre-K through 12th-grade teachers from all 50 U.S. states and Puerto Rico during the pandemic. In the current study, 43.7% of teachers reported experiencing at least one verbal threat, physical assault, and/or property damage, with verbal threats being the most prevalent form of victimization during the pandemic. Using a social-ecological framework and logistic regression analyses, characteristics of teachers, school climate, and school organizational and community factors were examined as predictors of teacher victimization (i.e., verbal threats, physical, property violence) during the pandemic. Findings revealed that teacher role (i.e., special educators), negative and positive dimensions of school climate, as well as school organizational and community factors (i.e., percent of students receiving free and reduced lunch, instructional modality, school level, and urbanicity) significantly predicted greater teacher victimization. While findings revealed that in-person instruction significantly predicted teacher violence across aggressors, teacher victimization was reported across instructional modality (in-person, hybrid, remote). Results offer insights into possible contextual antecedents to teacher victimization, sense of safety, and well-being in schools. Implications for research and school practice are presented. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行期间针对教师的暴力行为:对安全和福祉的社会生态分析。
针对教师的暴力是一种公共卫生危机,对学校工作人员的福祉、健康和留任以及学生的教育成果都有破坏性影响。美国心理学会暴力侵害教育工作者问题特别工作组与全国性组织合作,开展了首次全国性的教育工作者受害情况调查,调查对象包括美国 50 个州和波多黎各的 4,136 名学前班至 12 年级的教师。在本次调查中,43.7% 的教师表示至少遭受过一次口头威胁、人身攻击和/或财产损失,其中口头威胁是大流行病期间最普遍的受害形式。利用社会生态框架和逻辑回归分析,研究了大流行病期间教师受害(即口头威胁、人身攻击和财产损失)的预测因素--教师特征、学校氛围、学校组织和社区因素。研究结果表明,教师角色(即特殊教育工作者)、学校氛围的消极和积极维度以及学校组织和社区因素(即接受免费和减价午餐的学生比例、教学模式、学校级别和城市化程度)都能显著预测教师受害程度。研究结果表明,面对面教学在很大程度上预示着不同施暴者之间的教师暴力行为,而不同教学模式(面对面教学、混合教学、远程教学)都会导致教师受害。研究结果为了解学校中教师受害、安全感和幸福感的可能背景因素提供了启示。本文还介绍了研究和学校实践的意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Randomization in single-case design experiments: Addressing threats to internal validity. Using mixed methods to improve understanding and advancement of mixed methods research in school psychology. Poisson regression is the best method to analyze cumulative adverse childhood experiences. Youth mental health first aid for educators of immigrant-origin youth: A mixed-method evaluation of the virtual delivery approach. Academic screening in middle school: Exploring bivariate and intraindividual relations in reading and math performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1