Anne Kamphausen, Natalia Tarasova, Abigail Bardwell, Torrey A Laack, Larissa T Shiue, Tobias Kummer
{"title":"Does needle positioning with magnetic field induction improve central venous catheterization performance by novice learners?","authors":"Anne Kamphausen, Natalia Tarasova, Abigail Bardwell, Torrey A Laack, Larissa T Shiue, Tobias Kummer","doi":"10.1177/11297298231191374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The novel ultrasound magnetic needle navigation technique can visualize the entire needle and identify its projected trajectory. We hypothesized that this technique increases the first-attempt success rate of central venous puncture by novice learners compared with the conventional needle navigation technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, controlled trial with a crossover design included 50 participants with limited prior experience in US-guided procedures. Participants were randomly assigned to novel or conventional technique groups and asked to perform central venous cannulation in a phantom task trainer. After the first successful attempt, participants were allocated to the other technique group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although participants in the novel technique group had a higher first-attempt success rate than did those in the conventional technique group, this difference was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.17). The total number of attempts also did not significantly differ (<i>p</i> = 0.16). The conventional technique group had more needle redirections (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and a longer time to successful cannulation (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The number of adverse effects (<i>p</i> = 0.32) did not differ between groups. Participant confidence levels were higher in the novel technique group (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Magnetic needle navigation can reduce the number of needle redirections, shorten the time to successful cannulation, and increase confidence levels by novice learners for successful US-guided central venous access.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"1877-1884"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231191374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The novel ultrasound magnetic needle navigation technique can visualize the entire needle and identify its projected trajectory. We hypothesized that this technique increases the first-attempt success rate of central venous puncture by novice learners compared with the conventional needle navigation technique.
Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled trial with a crossover design included 50 participants with limited prior experience in US-guided procedures. Participants were randomly assigned to novel or conventional technique groups and asked to perform central venous cannulation in a phantom task trainer. After the first successful attempt, participants were allocated to the other technique group.
Results: Although participants in the novel technique group had a higher first-attempt success rate than did those in the conventional technique group, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.17). The total number of attempts also did not significantly differ (p = 0.16). The conventional technique group had more needle redirections (p = 0.01) and a longer time to successful cannulation (p = 0.01). The number of adverse effects (p = 0.32) did not differ between groups. Participant confidence levels were higher in the novel technique group (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Magnetic needle navigation can reduce the number of needle redirections, shorten the time to successful cannulation, and increase confidence levels by novice learners for successful US-guided central venous access.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques.
All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process.
The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level:
• Dialysis
• Oncology
• Interventional radiology
• Nutrition
• Nursing
• Intensive care
Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.