Acute stroke in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in acute coronary syndrome: Predictors and outcomes.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Perfusion-Uk Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-28 DOI:10.1177/02676591231193636
Ihor Krasivskyi, Borko Ivanov, Stephen Gerfer, Clara Großmann, Mariya Mihaylova, Kaveh Eghbalzadeh, Anton Sabashnikov, Antje-Christin Deppe, Parwis Baradaran Rahmanian, Navid Mader, Ilija Djordjevic, Thorsten Wahlers
{"title":"Acute stroke in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in acute coronary syndrome: Predictors and outcomes.","authors":"Ihor Krasivskyi, Borko Ivanov, Stephen Gerfer, Clara Großmann, Mariya Mihaylova, Kaveh Eghbalzadeh, Anton Sabashnikov, Antje-Christin Deppe, Parwis Baradaran Rahmanian, Navid Mader, Ilija Djordjevic, Thorsten Wahlers","doi":"10.1177/02676591231193636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a high-risk procedure and is associated with adverse outcomes. The risk factors of acute stroke in the above-mentioned patients stay unclear and some appropriate data is lacking in the literature. Thus, we aimed to investigate the predictors of acute stroke in patients undergoing CABG surgery in ACS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective single-centre cohort analysis was conducted. All patients (<i>n</i> = 1344) who suffered from acute coronary syndrome and underwent CABG procedure at the University hospital Cologne from June 2011 until October 2019 were included in our study. In order to find the risk factors of acute stroke after bypass surgery, patients were divided into two groups (non-stroke group (<i>n</i> = 1297) and stroke group (<i>n</i> = 47)). In order to even above-mentioned groups propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed (non-stroke group (<i>n</i> = 46) and stroke group (<i>n</i> = 46).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (<i>p</i> = .015) and cross clamp time (<i>p</i> = .006) were significantly longer in patients who suffered stroke. Perioperative myocardial infarction was significantly higher (<i>p</i> = .030) in the stroke group. Likewise, the duration of intensive care unit stay (<i>p</i> < .001) and in-hospital stay (<i>p</i> < .001) were significantly longer in patients with stroke. However, the mortality rate did not differ significantly (<i>p</i> = .131) between above-mentioned groups. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed cardiogenic shock (<i>p</i> = .003), peripheral vascular disease (PVD, <i>p</i> = .025) and previous stroke (<i>p</i> = .045) as relevant independent predictors for acute stroke after CABG procedure in patients with ACS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on our findings, acute stroke after bypass surgery in patients with ACS is associated with increased mortality and adverse outcomes. Cardiogenic shock, peripheral vascular disease and previous stroke were independent predictors of stroke after CABG procedure. Therefore, preoperative evaluation of potential risk factors may be crucial to improve postoperative results.</p>","PeriodicalId":49707,"journal":{"name":"Perfusion-Uk","volume":" ","pages":"1348-1355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perfusion-Uk","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591231193636","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a high-risk procedure and is associated with adverse outcomes. The risk factors of acute stroke in the above-mentioned patients stay unclear and some appropriate data is lacking in the literature. Thus, we aimed to investigate the predictors of acute stroke in patients undergoing CABG surgery in ACS.

Methods: The retrospective single-centre cohort analysis was conducted. All patients (n = 1344) who suffered from acute coronary syndrome and underwent CABG procedure at the University hospital Cologne from June 2011 until October 2019 were included in our study. In order to find the risk factors of acute stroke after bypass surgery, patients were divided into two groups (non-stroke group (n = 1297) and stroke group (n = 47)). In order to even above-mentioned groups propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed (non-stroke group (n = 46) and stroke group (n = 46).

Results: Duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (p = .015) and cross clamp time (p = .006) were significantly longer in patients who suffered stroke. Perioperative myocardial infarction was significantly higher (p = .030) in the stroke group. Likewise, the duration of intensive care unit stay (p < .001) and in-hospital stay (p < .001) were significantly longer in patients with stroke. However, the mortality rate did not differ significantly (p = .131) between above-mentioned groups. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed cardiogenic shock (p = .003), peripheral vascular disease (PVD, p = .025) and previous stroke (p = .045) as relevant independent predictors for acute stroke after CABG procedure in patients with ACS.

Conclusion: Based on our findings, acute stroke after bypass surgery in patients with ACS is associated with increased mortality and adverse outcomes. Cardiogenic shock, peripheral vascular disease and previous stroke were independent predictors of stroke after CABG procedure. Therefore, preoperative evaluation of potential risk factors may be crucial to improve postoperative results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性冠状动脉综合征冠状动脉旁路移植手术患者的急性中风:预测因素和结果
目的:急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的冠状动脉旁路移植(CABG)手术仍是一种高风险手术,且与不良预后相关。上述患者发生急性卒中的风险因素尚不明确,文献中也缺乏相应的数据。因此,我们旨在研究接受 CABG 手术的 ACS 患者急性卒中的预测因素:方法:进行回顾性单中心队列分析。研究纳入了 2011 年 6 月至 2019 年 10 月期间在科隆大学医院接受 CABG 手术的所有急性冠状动脉综合征患者(n = 1344)。为了找出搭桥手术后急性中风的风险因素,我们将患者分为两组(非中风组(n = 1297)和中风组(n = 47))。为了对上述两组进行倾向得分匹配(PSM)分析(非中风组(n = 46)和中风组(n = 46)):结果:中风患者的心肺旁路时间(p = .015)和交叉钳夹时间(p = .006)明显更长。中风组围手术期心肌梗死的发生率明显更高(p = .030)。同样,中风患者的重症监护室住院时间(p < .001)和住院时间(p < .001)也明显更长。然而,上述两组患者的死亡率并无明显差异(p = .131)。单变量和多变量分析显示,心源性休克(p = .003)、外周血管疾病(PVD,p = .025)和既往中风(p = .045)是 ACS 患者 CABG 术后急性中风的相关独立预测因素:结论:根据我们的研究结果,ACS 患者搭桥手术后急性卒中与死亡率增加和不良预后有关。心源性休克、外周血管疾病和既往中风是 CABG 术后中风的独立预测因素。因此,术前评估潜在风险因素对改善术后效果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perfusion-Uk
Perfusion-Uk 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perfusion is an ISI-ranked, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, which provides current information on all aspects of perfusion, oxygenation and biocompatibility and their use in modern cardiac surgery. The journal is at the forefront of international research and development and presents an appropriately multidisciplinary approach to perfusion science.
期刊最新文献
Del Nido versus conventional blood cardioplegia in tetralogy of fallot repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Factors associated with activated clotting time following heparin administration in pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass: A retrospective study. Outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection repair in patients under the age of 75 versus 75 and older. Comparative analysis of clinico-metabolic profiles between St Thomas and del Nido cardioplegia solutions: A pilot study. Unfractionated heparin monitoring by anti-factor Xa versus activated partial thromboplastin time strategies during venoarterial extracorporeal life support.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1