The Value of New Fields in the Medical Record for Quality Improvement.

Theodore Poufos, Georgios Rigakos, Stefanos Labropoulos, Kalliopi Stathaki, Ioanna Theodorakopoulou, Lina Hadjiyassemi, Effrosyni Vlachou, Olympia Spyri, Ioanna Prasini, Evangelia Razis
{"title":"The Value of New Fields in the Medical Record for Quality Improvement.","authors":"Theodore Poufos,&nbsp;Georgios Rigakos,&nbsp;Stefanos Labropoulos,&nbsp;Kalliopi Stathaki,&nbsp;Ioanna Theodorakopoulou,&nbsp;Lina Hadjiyassemi,&nbsp;Effrosyni Vlachou,&nbsp;Olympia Spyri,&nbsp;Ioanna Prasini,&nbsp;Evangelia Razis","doi":"10.36401/JQSH-20-37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Quality in healthcare delivery is important for the safety and experience of patients with cancer. Effective documentation is an integral component of quality improvment, and accurate documentation can be affected by prompts in the medical record, potentially improving quality of services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Contemporary Oncology Team (COT) is a Greek private oncology practice that participated in the American Society of Clinical Oncology's (ASCO's) Quality in Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI). Between 2014 and 2019, COT implemented changes in its paper patient medical record, in order to improve quality of care and documentation. Fields regarding pain, emotional well-being and psychosocial assessment, discussions with the patient and consent about treatment and disease, medication details and cumulative dose, treatment goals, side-effect grading, pregnancy screening, treatment adherence and anticipated duration were added. In this report, we present the association of these improvements with COT performance in QOPI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pain and emotional well-being assessment and documentation were significantly improved by the development of a structured patient follow-up form. In contrast, the assessment of fertility issues, tobacco use, and the documentation of treatment plan and intent did not present a drastic change, because COT performance was already above QOPI average.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A thorough reform of COT paper medical record according to QOPI standards improved QOPI scores, but more importantly effected a shift in the team's culture to safer and more standardized quality based care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73170,"journal":{"name":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","volume":"4 2","pages":"65-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228984/pdf/i2589-9449-4-2-65.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-20-37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Quality in healthcare delivery is important for the safety and experience of patients with cancer. Effective documentation is an integral component of quality improvment, and accurate documentation can be affected by prompts in the medical record, potentially improving quality of services.

Methods: The Contemporary Oncology Team (COT) is a Greek private oncology practice that participated in the American Society of Clinical Oncology's (ASCO's) Quality in Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI). Between 2014 and 2019, COT implemented changes in its paper patient medical record, in order to improve quality of care and documentation. Fields regarding pain, emotional well-being and psychosocial assessment, discussions with the patient and consent about treatment and disease, medication details and cumulative dose, treatment goals, side-effect grading, pregnancy screening, treatment adherence and anticipated duration were added. In this report, we present the association of these improvements with COT performance in QOPI.

Results: Pain and emotional well-being assessment and documentation were significantly improved by the development of a structured patient follow-up form. In contrast, the assessment of fertility issues, tobacco use, and the documentation of treatment plan and intent did not present a drastic change, because COT performance was already above QOPI average.

Conclusion: A thorough reform of COT paper medical record according to QOPI standards improved QOPI scores, but more importantly effected a shift in the team's culture to safer and more standardized quality based care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
病案新领域对质量改进的价值。
简介:医疗保健服务的质量对癌症患者的安全和体验很重要。有效的文件记录是质量改进的一个组成部分,准确的文件记录可能受到医疗记录提示的影响,从而可能提高服务质量。方法:当代肿瘤团队(COT)是一家希腊私人肿瘤诊所,参与了美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)肿瘤实践质量倡议(QOPI)。2014年至2019年期间,COT对纸质患者病历进行了修改,以提高护理和记录质量。增加了疼痛、情绪健康和心理社会评估、与患者讨论并同意治疗和疾病、药物细节和累积剂量、治疗目标、副作用分级、妊娠筛查、治疗依从性和预期持续时间等领域。在本报告中,我们提出了这些改进与QOPI中COT性能的关联。结果:疼痛和情绪健康评估和记录显著改善了结构化的病人随访形式的发展。相比之下,对生育问题的评估、烟草使用、治疗计划和意图的记录没有出现剧烈变化,因为COT表现已经高于QOPI平均水平。结论:根据QOPI标准对COT纸质病案进行彻底改革,提高了QOPI评分,但更重要的是促进了团队文化向更安全、更规范的质量医疗的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Group Antenatal Care Start-Up in the Indian Private Sector: An Implementation Journey to Improve Quality of Care. Accreditation Made Easy: Step-by-Step Guide for Healthcare Institutions. Summary of the 5th International Pharmacoeconomics Forum. Community Health Needs Assessment of Primary Healthcare in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Prescribing Errors in an Ambulatory Care Setting: Mitigating Risks in Outpatient Medication Orders, Cross-Sectional Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1