Leveraging an implementation science partnership network to understand how Federally Qualified Health Centers operationalize and address health equity.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Translational Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-11 DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibad046
Kelly A Aschbrenner, Jennifer L Cruz, Gina R Kruse, Huy Nguyen, Cristina Huebner Torres, Maria Celli, Carrie Sarcione, Deepinder Singh, Karen M Emmons
{"title":"Leveraging an implementation science partnership network to understand how Federally Qualified Health Centers operationalize and address health equity.","authors":"Kelly A Aschbrenner, Jennifer L Cruz, Gina R Kruse, Huy Nguyen, Cristina Huebner Torres, Maria Celli, Carrie Sarcione, Deepinder Singh, Karen M Emmons","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibad046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health equity-focused implementation research requires using definitions and approaches that are relevant and meaningful to implementation partners. We examined how health equity was operationalized and addressed at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs). We conducted semi-structured interviews with leadership (n = 19) and staff (n = 12) at 10 FQHCs in an implementation science partnership network for cancer control equity to understand how they operationalized and addressed health equity. We performed rapid qualitative analysis and shared findings with a larger group of 13 community health centers (including the 10 FQHCs) at an Implementation Learning Community (ILC) to identify action areas for research and practice, followed by a second phase of synthesizing qualitative codes into themes and mapping themes onto a framework for advancing health equity in healthcare organizations. Participants defined health equity as central to the mission of FQHCs, and identified barriers (e.g. financing models) and facilitators (e.g. interpreter services) to advancing health equity at FQHCs. These findings resonated with ILC participants who emphasized the challenge of addressing root cause social determinants of inequities using limited available resources in FQHCs and the importance of developing meaningful collaboration with communities for data collection, data interpretation, data use, and data ownership. Themes captured recommendations to advance health equity in daily work at FQHCs, including investments in staffing, training, and resources. Mapping qualitative themes from health equity-centered interviews with FQHC partners onto a framework for advancing health equity in healthcare organizations can provide clear, context-specific direction for actions aimed at improving health and healthcare equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"23-33"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10782902/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibad046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health equity-focused implementation research requires using definitions and approaches that are relevant and meaningful to implementation partners. We examined how health equity was operationalized and addressed at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs). We conducted semi-structured interviews with leadership (n = 19) and staff (n = 12) at 10 FQHCs in an implementation science partnership network for cancer control equity to understand how they operationalized and addressed health equity. We performed rapid qualitative analysis and shared findings with a larger group of 13 community health centers (including the 10 FQHCs) at an Implementation Learning Community (ILC) to identify action areas for research and practice, followed by a second phase of synthesizing qualitative codes into themes and mapping themes onto a framework for advancing health equity in healthcare organizations. Participants defined health equity as central to the mission of FQHCs, and identified barriers (e.g. financing models) and facilitators (e.g. interpreter services) to advancing health equity at FQHCs. These findings resonated with ILC participants who emphasized the challenge of addressing root cause social determinants of inequities using limited available resources in FQHCs and the importance of developing meaningful collaboration with communities for data collection, data interpretation, data use, and data ownership. Themes captured recommendations to advance health equity in daily work at FQHCs, including investments in staffing, training, and resources. Mapping qualitative themes from health equity-centered interviews with FQHC partners onto a framework for advancing health equity in healthcare organizations can provide clear, context-specific direction for actions aimed at improving health and healthcare equity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用实施科学合作伙伴网络,了解联邦合格医疗中心如何实施和解决健康公平问题。
以健康公平为重点的实施研究需要使用与实施伙伴相关且有意义的定义和方法。我们研究了联邦合格医疗中心 (FQHC) 如何操作和处理健康公平问题。我们对癌症控制公平实施科学合作网络中的 10 家联邦合格医疗中心的领导层(n = 19)和员工(n = 12)进行了半结构化访谈,以了解他们如何实施和解决健康公平问题。我们进行了快速定性分析,并在实施学习社区(ILC)中与 13 家社区健康中心(包括 10 家 FQHC)分享了分析结果,以确定研究和实践的行动领域,随后进行了第二阶段的工作,将定性代码综合为主题,并将主题映射到促进医疗机构健康公平的框架中。参与者将健康公平定义为联邦定点医疗保健机构的核心使命,并确定了在联邦定点医疗保健机构推进健康公平的障碍(如融资模式)和促进因素(如口译服务)。这些发现引起了 ILC 参与者的共鸣,他们强调了利用 FQHC 有限的可用资源解决不公平的社会决定因素的挑战,以及在数据收集、数据解释、数据使用和数据所有权方面与社区开展有意义合作的重要性。这些主题反映了在 FQHC 日常工作中促进健康公平的建议,包括在人员配备、培训和资源方面的投资。将与 FQHC 合作伙伴进行的以健康公平为中心的访谈中的定性主题映射到促进医疗机构健康公平的框架中,可为旨在改善健康和医疗公平的行动提供明确、具体的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Translational Behavioral Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989. TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
期刊最新文献
Individual and clinical factors associated with patient acceptance of referrals to social services and community resources at a multi-purpose resource hub. Adaptation of meaning-centered psychotherapy for healthcare providers to buffer work-induced distress and improve wellbeing. Advancing translational research in digital cardiac rehabilitation: The preparation phase of the Multiphase Optimization Strategy. Multilevel factors influence the use of a cardiovascular disease assessment tool embedded in the electronic health record in oncology care. A Prescription Produce Program integrating lifestyle behavior counseling and health education: A program description and evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1