From pity to fear: security as a mechanism for (re)production of vulnerability

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Disasters Pub Date : 2022-11-10 DOI:10.1111/disa.12568
Ksenia Chmutina, Jason von Meding, Darien Alexander Williams, Jamie Vickery, Carlee Purdum
{"title":"From pity to fear: security as a mechanism for (re)production of vulnerability","authors":"Ksenia Chmutina,&nbsp;Jason von Meding,&nbsp;Darien Alexander Williams,&nbsp;Jamie Vickery,&nbsp;Carlee Purdum","doi":"10.1111/disa.12568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Vulnerability is not only a shared basic condition, but also a condition of potential. In the context of disasters and crises, the concept of vulnerability is frequently used to portray individuals and groups as ‘weak’, ‘threatened’, and ‘in need of help’. Occasionally, though, a shift occurs and the ‘threatened’—and therefore usually the pitied—become those who are feared and hated, that is, they become a ‘threat’. This paper explores how apparently incompatible discursive regimes of ‘threatened’ and ‘threat’ intertwine, merge, and feed upon each other, and how vulnerability can be and is consequently securitised. It demonstrates that too often the freedoms and opportunities prescribed by the neoliberal state are impossible to actualise when ‘normality’ and hence ‘otherness’ are also defined by the state, where people are first and foremost subjects of a global market. These considerations are critical if we are truly to reduce vulnerabilisation by focusing on justice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48088,"journal":{"name":"Disasters","volume":"47 3","pages":"546-562"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/disa.12568","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disasters","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/disa.12568","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Vulnerability is not only a shared basic condition, but also a condition of potential. In the context of disasters and crises, the concept of vulnerability is frequently used to portray individuals and groups as ‘weak’, ‘threatened’, and ‘in need of help’. Occasionally, though, a shift occurs and the ‘threatened’—and therefore usually the pitied—become those who are feared and hated, that is, they become a ‘threat’. This paper explores how apparently incompatible discursive regimes of ‘threatened’ and ‘threat’ intertwine, merge, and feed upon each other, and how vulnerability can be and is consequently securitised. It demonstrates that too often the freedoms and opportunities prescribed by the neoliberal state are impossible to actualise when ‘normality’ and hence ‘otherness’ are also defined by the state, where people are first and foremost subjects of a global market. These considerations are critical if we are truly to reduce vulnerabilisation by focusing on justice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从怜悯到恐惧:安全是脆弱性(再)产生的机制
脆弱性不仅是一种共同的基本条件,也是一种潜在的条件。在灾难和危机的背景下,脆弱性的概念经常被用来将个人和群体描述为“软弱”、“受到威胁”和“需要帮助”。然而,偶尔会发生转变,“受威胁的”——因此通常是被同情的——变成了让人害怕和讨厌的人,也就是说,他们变成了“威胁”。本文探讨了“威胁”和“威胁”这两个明显不相容的话语体系是如何相互交织、合并和相互依存的,以及脆弱性是如何被证券化的。它表明,当“常态”和“他者”也被国家定义时,新自由主义国家规定的自由和机会往往是不可能实现的,在这个国家中,人们首先是全球市场的主体。如果我们要真正通过注重正义来减少脆弱性,这些考虑是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disasters
Disasters Multiple-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Disasters is a major, peer-reviewed quarterly journal reporting on all aspects of disaster studies, policy and management. It provides a forum for academics, policymakers and practitioners to publish high-quality research and practice concerning natural catastrophes, anthropogenic disasters, complex political emergencies and protracted crises around the world. The journal promotes the interchange of ideas and experience, maintaining a balance between field reports, case study articles of general interest and academic papers. Disasters: Is the leading journal in the field of disasters, protracted crises and complex emergencies Influences disaster prevention, mitigation and response policies and practices Adopts a world-wide geographical perspective Contains a mix of academic papers and field studies Promotes the interchange of ideas between practitioners, policy-makers and academics.
期刊最新文献
Famine and food security: new trends and systems or politics as usual? An introduction. Five levels of famine prevention: towards a framework for the twenty-first century and beyond. Food insecurity, xenophobia, and political legitimacy: exploring the links in post-COVID-19 South Africa. Food systems in protracted crises: examining indigenous food sovereignty amid de-development in Kashmir. Sudan's catastrophe: the role of changing dynamics of food and power in the Gezira agricultural scheme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1