The effects of a national, voluntary agreement for a more inclusive working life on work participation following long-term sickness absence: a Norwegian cohort study.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-07 DOI:10.5271/sjweh.4112
Rachel L Hasting, Ingrid S Mehlum, Karina Undem, Suzan J W Robroek, Alex Burdorf, Jon Michael Gran, Suzanne L Merkus
{"title":"The effects of a national, voluntary agreement for a more inclusive working life on work participation following long-term sickness absence: a Norwegian cohort study.","authors":"Rachel L Hasting, Ingrid S Mehlum, Karina Undem, Suzan J W Robroek, Alex Burdorf, Jon Michael Gran, Suzanne L Merkus","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to estimate the average individual effect of the company-level Norwegian Agreement on a More Inclusive Working Life (IA Agreement) on individuals' (i) sustained return to work after a sickness absence (SA) episode, and (ii) recurrent SA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using register data, 79 253 men and 94 914 women born in Norway 1967-1976 were followed for one year between 2005 and 2010 after returning to work from an SA episode (>16 days). Weighted Cox proportional hazard models analysed time to first exit from work by companies' IA status (IA/non-IA). Weighted cumulative incidence differences between IA and non-IA groups with 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the competing events of full SA, graded (<100%) SA, unemployment/economic inactivity, education, disability pension, and death/emigration. Stabilised inverse probability of treatment weights balanced IA/non-IA groups according to nine covariates. Analyses were stratified by gender, and separately for two initial SA diagnoses (musculoskeletal and psychological).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both men [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99] and women (adjusted HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99) in IA companies were less likely to exit work in the year following SA. Similar findings were seen among individuals with musculoskeletal diagnoses and women with psychological diagnoses. Men with psychological diagnoses were more likely to exit work. Recurrent full and graded SA were more likely, and unemployment/economic inactivity less likely, in IA companies. However, the estimated effects were small and the CI often included the null.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals working in IA companies were more likely to remain in work. This was mainly due to reduced unemployment/economic inactivity, suggesting the IA Agreement may have influenced work participation through other means than reduced SA.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"466-476"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10838625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to estimate the average individual effect of the company-level Norwegian Agreement on a More Inclusive Working Life (IA Agreement) on individuals' (i) sustained return to work after a sickness absence (SA) episode, and (ii) recurrent SA.

Methods: Using register data, 79 253 men and 94 914 women born in Norway 1967-1976 were followed for one year between 2005 and 2010 after returning to work from an SA episode (>16 days). Weighted Cox proportional hazard models analysed time to first exit from work by companies' IA status (IA/non-IA). Weighted cumulative incidence differences between IA and non-IA groups with 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the competing events of full SA, graded (<100%) SA, unemployment/economic inactivity, education, disability pension, and death/emigration. Stabilised inverse probability of treatment weights balanced IA/non-IA groups according to nine covariates. Analyses were stratified by gender, and separately for two initial SA diagnoses (musculoskeletal and psychological).

Results: Both men [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99] and women (adjusted HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99) in IA companies were less likely to exit work in the year following SA. Similar findings were seen among individuals with musculoskeletal diagnoses and women with psychological diagnoses. Men with psychological diagnoses were more likely to exit work. Recurrent full and graded SA were more likely, and unemployment/economic inactivity less likely, in IA companies. However, the estimated effects were small and the CI often included the null.

Conclusions: Individuals working in IA companies were more likely to remain in work. This was mainly due to reduced unemployment/economic inactivity, suggesting the IA Agreement may have influenced work participation through other means than reduced SA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长期病假后,一项关于更具包容性的工作生活的国家自愿协议对工作参与的影响:一项挪威队列研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估公司层面的《挪威更具包容性工作生活协议》(IA协议)对个人(i)病假后持续重返工作岗位(SA)和(ii)复发性SA的平均个人影响。方法:使用注册数据,对1967-1976年出生于挪威的79253名男性和94914名女性在SA发作(>16天)后返回工作岗位后,于2005年至2010年间进行了一年的随访。加权Cox比例风险模型按公司IA状态(IA/非IA)分析了首次离职的时间。计算了IA组和非IA组之间的加权累积发病率差异(95%自举置信区间(CI)),用于完全SA的竞争项目,并进行了分级(结果:IA公司的男性[调整后的风险比(HR)0.96,95%CI 0.93-0.99]和女性(调整后的HR 0.97,95%CI 0.9 4-0.99)在SA后的一年中都不太可能离职。在有肌肉骨骼诊断的个体和有心理诊断的女性中也发现了类似的发现。有心理诊断的男性更有可能离职。在IA公司中,复发性完全和分级SA的可能性更大,失业/经济不活跃的可能性更小。然而,估计的影响很小,CI通常包括null。结论:在IA公司工作的个人更有可能继续工作。这主要是由于失业率/经济不活跃的减少,这表明IA协议可能通过减少SA以外的其他方式影响了工作参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health
Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
9.50%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal is to promote research in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety and to increase knowledge through the publication of original research articles, systematic reviews, and other information of high interest. Areas of interest include occupational and environmental epidemiology, occupational and environmental medicine, psychosocial factors at work, physical work load, physical activity work-related mental and musculoskeletal problems, aging, work ability and return to work, working hours and health, occupational hygiene and toxicology, work safety and injury epidemiology as well as occupational health services. In addition to observational studies, quasi-experimental and intervention studies are welcome as well as methodological papers, occupational cohort profiles, and studies associated with economic evaluation. The Journal also publishes short communications, case reports, commentaries, discussion papers, clinical questions, consensus reports, meeting reports, other reports, book reviews, news, and announcements (jobs, courses, events etc).
期刊最新文献
Prevention of hypertension due to long working hours and other work hazards is needed to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. Emotional dissonance and mental health among home-care workers: A nationwide prospective study of the moderating role of leadership behaviors. Workplace-based prevention and management of knee pain: a systematic review. Towards the year 2049: The next 25 years of occupational health and safety research. When will we have enough evidence to require improvements at the workplace?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1