Time to analgesia for musculoskeletal presentations in Tasmanian emergency departments: a case-controlled comparative observational study investigating the impact of advanced practice physiotherapists.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Australian Health Review Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1071/AH23032
David Jovic, Kirby Tuckerman, Claire Bergenroth, Viet Tran
{"title":"Time to analgesia for musculoskeletal presentations in Tasmanian emergency departments: a case-controlled comparative observational study investigating the impact of advanced practice physiotherapists.","authors":"David Jovic,&nbsp;Kirby Tuckerman,&nbsp;Claire Bergenroth,&nbsp;Viet Tran","doi":"10.1071/AH23032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective To assess the timeliness of analgesia provided to patients presenting with musculoskeletal conditions, by advanced practice physiotherapists, medical officers and nurse practitioners in two Tasmanian emergency departments. Methods A retrospective case-controlled comparative observational study collected patient data over a 6 month period. Index cases were consecutive cases treated by an advanced practice physiotherapist, with a medical and nurse practitioner cohort case-matched based on clinical and demographic factors. Time to analgesia from initial triage and time to analgesia from patient allocation to health professional groups were analysed using Mann-Whitney U -test. Further assessment comparing between-group differences in access to analgesia within 30 and 60 min of emergency department triage was included. Results Two hundred and twenty-four patients who received analgesia while in the primary care of advanced practice physiotherapists were matched against 308 others. Median time to analgesia for the advanced practice physiotherapy group was 40.5 min compared with 59 min in the comparison group (P  = 0.001). Allocation to analgesia time for the advanced practice physiotherapy group was 27 min, compared with 30 min in the comparison group (P  = 0.465). Access to analgesia within 30 min of presentation to the emergency department is low (36.1% vs 30.8%, P  = 0.175). Conclusion For musculoskeletal presentations in two Tasmanian emergency departments, patients received more timely analgesia when in the care of an advanced practice physiotherapist compared with medical or nurse practitioner care. Further improvements in analgesia access are possible, with time from allocation to analgesia a potential target for intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":55425,"journal":{"name":"Australian Health Review","volume":"47 3","pages":"268-273"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Health Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH23032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To assess the timeliness of analgesia provided to patients presenting with musculoskeletal conditions, by advanced practice physiotherapists, medical officers and nurse practitioners in two Tasmanian emergency departments. Methods A retrospective case-controlled comparative observational study collected patient data over a 6 month period. Index cases were consecutive cases treated by an advanced practice physiotherapist, with a medical and nurse practitioner cohort case-matched based on clinical and demographic factors. Time to analgesia from initial triage and time to analgesia from patient allocation to health professional groups were analysed using Mann-Whitney U -test. Further assessment comparing between-group differences in access to analgesia within 30 and 60 min of emergency department triage was included. Results Two hundred and twenty-four patients who received analgesia while in the primary care of advanced practice physiotherapists were matched against 308 others. Median time to analgesia for the advanced practice physiotherapy group was 40.5 min compared with 59 min in the comparison group (P  = 0.001). Allocation to analgesia time for the advanced practice physiotherapy group was 27 min, compared with 30 min in the comparison group (P  = 0.465). Access to analgesia within 30 min of presentation to the emergency department is low (36.1% vs 30.8%, P  = 0.175). Conclusion For musculoskeletal presentations in two Tasmanian emergency departments, patients received more timely analgesia when in the care of an advanced practice physiotherapist compared with medical or nurse practitioner care. Further improvements in analgesia access are possible, with time from allocation to analgesia a potential target for intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塔斯马尼亚急诊科肌肉骨骼症状的镇痛时间:一项调查高级实践物理治疗师影响的病例对照比较观察研究。
目的评估塔斯马尼亚州两个急诊科的高级物理治疗师、医务人员和执业护士为患有肌肉骨骼疾病的患者提供镇痛的及时性。方法采用回顾性病例对照比较观察研究,收集6个月的患者资料。指标病例是由一名高级执业物理治疗师治疗的连续病例,根据临床和人口统计学因素进行医疗和护士执业队列病例匹配。采用Mann-Whitney U检验分析从初次分诊到镇痛的时间和从患者分配到卫生专业人员组到镇痛的时间。进一步评估比较组间在急诊科分诊后30和60分钟内获得镇痛药的差异。结果将224例在高级理疗师的初级护理中接受镇痛治疗的患者与308例其他患者进行对比。高级理疗组的中位镇痛时间为40.5 min,而对照组为59 min (P = 0.001)。高级理疗组镇痛时间分配为27 min,对照组为30 min (P = 0.465)。就诊后30分钟内获得镇痛的比例较低(36.1% vs 30.8%, P = 0.175)。结论:在塔斯马尼亚州的两个急诊科,接受高级理疗师治疗的患者比接受普通医生或执业护士治疗的患者得到更及时的镇痛。进一步改善镇痛途径是可能的,从分配到镇痛的时间是干预的潜在目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Health Review
Australian Health Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Health Review is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes contributions on all aspects of health policy, management and governance; healthcare delivery systems; workforce; health financing; and other matters of interest to those working in health care. In addition to analyses and commentary, the journal publishes original research from practitioners – managers and clinicians – and reports of breakthrough projects that demonstrate better ways of delivering care. Australian Health Review explores major national and international health issues and questions, enabling health professionals to keep their fingers on the pulse of the nation’s health decisions and to know what the most influential commentators and decision makers are thinking. Australian Health Review is a valuable resource for managers, policy makers and clinical staff in health organisations, including government departments, hospitals, community centres and aged-care facilities, as well as anyone with an interest in the health industry. Australian Health Review is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association.
期刊最新文献
Implementation of physiotherapy-led lung ultrasound in the intensive care unit. Clinical governance implications of a Victorian coronial finding regarding contrast-related anaphylaxis for health services and private providers of radiology services. Implementation of an in-reach rehabilitation program can increase the rate of discharge home from acute hospital care. Establishment of the first Australian public and health-professional palliative care advice service: exploring caller needs and gaps in care. Evaluating an implementation of the Australian National Guidelines for the On-Screen Display of Discharge Summaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1