Frailty, Quality of Life, and Loneliness of Aging in Native and Diasporic Chinese Adults.

Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.14283/jfa.2022.27
S L Cheung, W P Krijnen, C P van der Schans, J S M Hobbelen
{"title":"Frailty, Quality of Life, and Loneliness of Aging in Native and Diasporic Chinese Adults.","authors":"S L Cheung,&nbsp;W P Krijnen,&nbsp;C P van der Schans,&nbsp;J S M Hobbelen","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2022.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Global migration has increased in the past century, and aging in a foreign country is relevant to the Chinese diaspora.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>With regard to migration, this study focuses on the places of aging as the context of older Chinese adults. This study aimed to describe the general health and wellbeing of this population with respect to their location.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study has a cross sectional design.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Participants were recruited who were \"aging in place\" from Tianjin, China (199 participants), and \"aging out of place\" from the Netherlands (134 participants). Data from April to May 2019 in China and November 2018 to March 2019 in the Netherlands were aggregated.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>frailty, QoL and loneliness were used in both samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>T-tests and regression analyses demonstrated that social domains of frailty and QoL, as well as loneliness and frailty prevalence characterized the major differences between both places of aging. A correlation analysis and visual correlation network revealed that frailty, quality of life (QoL), and loneliness were more closely related in the aging out of place sample. Social domains of frailty and QoL, as well as the prevalence of loneliness and frailty, characterized the major differences between both places of aging.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings indicate that frailty, QoL, and loneliness have a complex relationship, confirming that loneliness is a major detriment to the general wellbeing of older Chinese adults aging out of place. This study examined the places of aging of the larger Chinese population and allows a comprehensive understanding of health and wellbeing. The social components, especially loneliness, among the aging out of place Chinese community should receive more attention practice and clinical wise. On the other hand, frailty as well as its prevention is of more importance for the Chinese community aging in place.</p>","PeriodicalId":75074,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"12 3","pages":"221-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2022.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Global migration has increased in the past century, and aging in a foreign country is relevant to the Chinese diaspora.

Objective: With regard to migration, this study focuses on the places of aging as the context of older Chinese adults. This study aimed to describe the general health and wellbeing of this population with respect to their location.

Design: This study has a cross sectional design.

Setting and participants: Participants were recruited who were "aging in place" from Tianjin, China (199 participants), and "aging out of place" from the Netherlands (134 participants). Data from April to May 2019 in China and November 2018 to March 2019 in the Netherlands were aggregated.

Measurements: frailty, QoL and loneliness were used in both samples.

Results: T-tests and regression analyses demonstrated that social domains of frailty and QoL, as well as loneliness and frailty prevalence characterized the major differences between both places of aging. A correlation analysis and visual correlation network revealed that frailty, quality of life (QoL), and loneliness were more closely related in the aging out of place sample. Social domains of frailty and QoL, as well as the prevalence of loneliness and frailty, characterized the major differences between both places of aging.

Conclusions: The findings indicate that frailty, QoL, and loneliness have a complex relationship, confirming that loneliness is a major detriment to the general wellbeing of older Chinese adults aging out of place. This study examined the places of aging of the larger Chinese population and allows a comprehensive understanding of health and wellbeing. The social components, especially loneliness, among the aging out of place Chinese community should receive more attention practice and clinical wise. On the other hand, frailty as well as its prevention is of more importance for the Chinese community aging in place.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国本土和海外华人成年人的脆弱、生活质量和老年孤独。
背景:在过去的一个世纪里,全球移民增加了,在国外的老龄化与中国侨民有关。目的:在人口迁移方面,本研究以中国老年人为背景,重点研究老龄化地区。这项研究的目的是描述这些人口的总体健康和福祉与他们的位置有关。设计:本研究采用横断面设计。环境和参与者:参与者来自中国天津(199名参与者)和来自荷兰(134名参与者)的“原地老化”参与者。汇总了2019年4月至5月中国和2018年11月至2019年3月荷兰的数据。测量:虚弱,生活质量和孤独感在两个样本中使用。结果:t检验和回归分析表明,脆弱和生活质量的社会领域,以及孤独和脆弱患病率是两个地区老龄化的主要差异。通过相关分析和视觉相关网络分析发现,老年人的脆弱性、生活质量(QoL)和孤独感之间的关系更为密切。脆弱和生活质量的社会领域,以及孤独和脆弱的流行,是两个地区老龄化的主要差异。结论:研究结果表明,虚弱、生活质量和孤独感之间存在复杂的关系,证实了孤独感是影响中国老年人整体幸福感的主要因素。这项研究调查了中国人口老龄化的地方,使人们对健康和福祉有了全面的了解。社会因素,尤其是孤独感,在中国的老年社区应该得到更多的关注,实践和临床智慧。另一方面,脆弱及其预防对于中国社区老龄化的到位更为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1