The Association Between Problematic Use of Alcohol and Drugs and Repeat Self-Harm and Suicidal Ideation.

Kate M Chitty, Rachael C Cvejic, Teresa Heintze, Preeyaporn Srasuebkul, Kirsten Morley, Andrew Dawson, Gregory Carter, Michael Dinh, Nicholas A Buckley, Julian N Trollor
{"title":"The Association Between Problematic Use of Alcohol and Drugs and Repeat Self-Harm and Suicidal Ideation.","authors":"Kate M Chitty,&nbsp;Rachael C Cvejic,&nbsp;Teresa Heintze,&nbsp;Preeyaporn Srasuebkul,&nbsp;Kirsten Morley,&nbsp;Andrew Dawson,&nbsp;Gregory Carter,&nbsp;Michael Dinh,&nbsp;Nicholas A Buckley,&nbsp;Julian N Trollor","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Aims:</i> We investigated the association between problematic use of alcohol and/or drugs (PUAD) and the incidence, urgency, and mode of discharge for a subsequent episode of self-harm (SH) or suicidal ideation (SI). <i>Methods:</i> This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of individuals admitted to hospital for an index episode of SH/SI (2010-2014) using linked data from hospital admissions and emergency department (ED) presentations. The outcome variables were (1) subsequent presentation to the ED for SH/SI, (2) triage category, and (3) mode of departure. Key predictors were PUAD. <i>Results:</i> In total, 23,007 individuals were admitted to hospital for an index SH/SI, of whom 8% had a subsequent presentation to an ED for SH/SI within a year. The odds of subsequent presentation was increased in those with problematic alcohol use (AOR 1.62, 95% CI 1.36, 1.92), drug use (AOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07, 1.53), and mental health diagnoses (AOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.44, 1.85). Those with problematic alcohol use were more likely to be assigned to the most urgent triage categories (AOR 1.84, 95% CI 1.32, 2.56). <i>Limitations:</i> Defining SH and PUAD using administrative data is challenging, and the true prevalence is likely to be underestimated. <i>Conclusion:</i> The findings underscore the importance of drug health intervention as a key component of self-harm prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":"44 4","pages":"309-317"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000880","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aims: We investigated the association between problematic use of alcohol and/or drugs (PUAD) and the incidence, urgency, and mode of discharge for a subsequent episode of self-harm (SH) or suicidal ideation (SI). Methods: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of individuals admitted to hospital for an index episode of SH/SI (2010-2014) using linked data from hospital admissions and emergency department (ED) presentations. The outcome variables were (1) subsequent presentation to the ED for SH/SI, (2) triage category, and (3) mode of departure. Key predictors were PUAD. Results: In total, 23,007 individuals were admitted to hospital for an index SH/SI, of whom 8% had a subsequent presentation to an ED for SH/SI within a year. The odds of subsequent presentation was increased in those with problematic alcohol use (AOR 1.62, 95% CI 1.36, 1.92), drug use (AOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07, 1.53), and mental health diagnoses (AOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.44, 1.85). Those with problematic alcohol use were more likely to be assigned to the most urgent triage categories (AOR 1.84, 95% CI 1.32, 2.56). Limitations: Defining SH and PUAD using administrative data is challenging, and the true prevalence is likely to be underestimated. Conclusion: The findings underscore the importance of drug health intervention as a key component of self-harm prevention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有问题的酒精和药物使用与重复自我伤害和自杀意念之间的关系。
目的:我们调查了酒精和/或药物的问题使用(PUAD)与随后自残(SH)或自杀意念(SI)发作的发生率、紧迫性和出院方式之间的关系。方法:这是一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2010-2014年因SH/SI指数发作而入院的个体,使用来自医院入院和急诊科(ED)报告的相关数据。结果变量为(1)随后因SH/SI向急诊科就诊,(2)分诊类别,(3)出院方式。关键预测因子是PUAD。结果:总共有23,007人因SH/SI指数入院,其中8%的人在一年内因SH/SI而就诊。在有问题的酒精使用(AOR 1.62, 95% CI 1.36, 1.92)、药物使用(AOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07, 1.53)和精神健康诊断(AOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.44, 1.85)的患者中,后续出现的几率增加。那些有酒精使用问题的人更有可能被分配到最紧急的分类(AOR 1.84, 95% CI 1.32, 2.56)。局限性:使用管理数据定义SH和PUAD具有挑战性,并且真实患病率可能被低估。结论:研究结果强调了药物健康干预作为自我伤害预防的关键组成部分的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.
期刊最新文献
The Prevalence of Suicidal Ideation According to Occupation and Other Employment Variables. Perceived Effectiveness of Components of Interventions to Support People Bereaved By Suicide. Exploring the Influence of Masculine Norms on Suicidal Ideation and Help-Seeking Behavior. Substitution of Methods in Suicide Deaths - Firearm Injury and Hanging. Using Real-Time Coronial Data to Detect Spatiotemporal Suicide Clusters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1